Literature DB >> 25193774

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and motor recovery after stroke.

M Simonetta-Moreau1.   

Abstract

Recovery of motor function after stroke occurs largely on the basis of a sustained capacity of the adult brain for plastic changes. This brain plasticity has been validated by functional imaging and electrophysiological studies. Various concepts of how to enhance beneficial plasticity and in turn improve functional recovery are emerging based on the concept of functional interhemispheric balance between the two motor cortices. Besides conventional rehabilitation interventions and the most recent neuropharmacological approaches, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has recently been proposed as an add-on method to promote motor function recovery after stroke. Several methods can be used based either on transcranial magnetic stimulation (repetitive mode: rTMS, TBS) via a coil, or small electric current via larges electrodes placed on the scalp, (transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS). Depending on the different electrophysiological parameters of stimulation used, NIBS can induce a transient modulation of the excitability of the stimulated motor cortex (facilitation or inhibition) via a probable LTP-LTD-like mechanism. Several small studies have shown feasible and positive treatment effects for most of these strategies and their potential clinical relevance to help restoring the disruption of interhemispheric imbalance after stroke. Results of these studies are encouraging but many questions remain unsolved: what are the optimal stimulation parameters? What is the best NIBS intervention? Which cortex, injured or intact, should be stimulated? What is the best window of intervention? Is there a special subgroup of stroke patients who could strongly benefit from these interventions? Finally is it possible to boost NIBS treatment effect by motor training of the paretic hand or by additional neuropharmacological interventions? There is clearly a need for large-scale, controlled, multicenter trials to answer these questions before proposing their routine use in the management of stroke patients.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVC; Brain plasticity; Motor recovery; PAS; Plasticité cérébrale; Récupération motrice; Stroke; TBS; rTMS; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193774     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  19 in total

1.  Effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and virtual reality training on upper limb function in subacute stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trail.

Authors:  Chan-Juan Zheng; Wei-Jing Liao; Wen-Guang Xia
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 2.  Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jessica M Pisegna; Asako Kaneoka; William G Pearson; Sandeep Kumar; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqing Tang; Kaiyue Han; Rongrong Wang; Yue Zhang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Jiang Li; Xiang-Min Meng; Ru-Yi Li; Ru Zhang; Zheng Zhang; Yi-Feng Du
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.135

5.  Bihemispheric Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Force Steadiness in Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Patients: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rafael A Montenegro; Adrian Midgley; Renato Massaferri; Wendell Bernardes; Alexandre H Okano; Paulo Farinatti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Non-invasive brain stimulation in early rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  A V Blesneag; L Popa; A D Stan
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

7.  Entrainment of Human Alpha Oscillations Selectively Enhances Visual Conjunction Search.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Anne-Katrin Vellage; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Tino Zaehle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Post-Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Nathalie Kubis
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on locomotion and balance in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Geiger; A Supiot; R Zory; P Aegerter; D Pradon; N Roche
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Neurofeedback-induced facilitation of the supplementary motor area affects postural stability.

Authors:  Hiroaki Fujimoto; Masahito Mihara; Noriaki Hattori; Megumi Hatakenaka; Hajime Yagura; Teiji Kawano; Ichiro Miyai; Hideki Mochizuki
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.