Literature DB >> 25192248

Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system.

Jeong Woo Lee1, Sung Yong Cho, Chang Wook Jeong, Jihyeong Yu, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Seung-June Oh, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Seung Bae Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate surgical outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From February 2004 to December 2011, 45 patients underwent LP, and 39 underwent PCNL for treatment of pelvic stone(s) with calyceal stone(s). Differences in demographics, perioperative data, and complications were compared between LP and PCNL patients. The primary end point in this study was the stone-free rate in a single session.
RESULTS: Stone-free rates were 91.1% and 64.1% in the LP and PCNL groups, respectively (P=.003). Mean operation time was longer in the LP group (P<.001). Mean change in hemoglobin level (P<.001) as well as postoperative analgesics usage (P=.022) was significantly better in the LP group. However, mean estimated blood loss (P=.112), mean change in creatinine level (P=.172) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P=.395), and mean length of hospitalization (P=.842) were similar in both groups. The PCNL group had more overall complications.
CONCLUSIONS: LP was safer and more effective than PCNL according to our study. Therefore, LP may be a feasible modality in managing multiple complex renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25192248     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  4 in total

1.  [Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Jiu-Min Liu; Xue-Cheng Bi; Dong Li; Shang Huang; Yan-Hua Feng; Chu-Qi Lin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-02-20

2.  Complex multiple renal calculi: stone distribution, pelvicalyceal anatomy and site of puncture as predictors of PCNL outcome.

Authors:  Amit Verma; Vinay Tomar; Shersingh Yadav
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-17

3.  Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tie Mao; Na Wei; Jing Yu; Yinghui Lu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yunjin Bai; Yin Tang; Lan Deng; Xiaoming Wang; Yubo Yang; Jia Wang; Ping Han
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.