Chia Wei Cheah1, Rathna Devi Vaithilingam, Chong Huat Siar, Dasan Swaminathan, G Conrad Hornbuckle. 1. *Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. †Professor, Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ‡Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess dimensional changes and histologic/histomorphometric aspects of grafted sockets using either calcium sulfate-platelet-rich plasma (CS-PRP) or CS alone in socket preservation procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve subjects with single nonmolar teeth underwent atraumatic extraction. Six sockets received CS grafts and 6 sockets received CS-PRP grafts. Cone-beam computerized tomography scans taken immediately after extraction and 4 months after surgery were used to measure vertical and horizontal dimensional changes. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses of grafted sites were performed at 4 months after surgery. Intergroup changes were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: CS group demonstrated 18.6% horizontal resorption as compared with 9.2% in CS-PRP group. Resorption for buccal height (BH) (14%) and palatal/lingual height (PH) (13.7%) in CS group was nearly 3 times more than resorption in BH (5%) and PH (4.6%) for CS-PRP group. Mineralized bone component in CS-PRP group (11.19% ± 6.59%) was significantly more than CS group (1.51% ± 2.86%) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CS-PRP-grafted sites demonstrated higher mineralized bone content than CS-grafted sites.
OBJECTIVES: To assess dimensional changes and histologic/histomorphometric aspects of grafted sockets using either calcium sulfate-platelet-rich plasma (CS-PRP) or CS alone in socket preservation procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve subjects with single nonmolar teeth underwent atraumatic extraction. Six sockets received CS grafts and 6 sockets received CS-PRP grafts. Cone-beam computerized tomography scans taken immediately after extraction and 4 months after surgery were used to measure vertical and horizontal dimensional changes. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses of grafted sites were performed at 4 months after surgery. Intergroup changes were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS:CS group demonstrated 18.6% horizontal resorption as compared with 9.2% in CS-PRP group. Resorption for buccal height (BH) (14%) and palatal/lingual height (PH) (13.7%) in CS group was nearly 3 times more than resorption in BH (5%) and PH (4.6%) for CS-PRP group. Mineralized bone component in CS-PRP group (11.19% ± 6.59%) was significantly more than CS group (1.51% ± 2.86%) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION:CS-PRP-grafted sites demonstrated higher mineralized bone content than CS-grafted sites.