Literature DB >> 25191595

Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, folate and vitamin B12 biomarkers among international colorectal cancer patients: a pilot study.

Cornelia M Ulrich1, Adetunji T Toriola2, Erin M Siegel3, Hermann Brenner4, Jenny Chang-Claude5, Clare Abbenhardt6, Jana Kotzmann6, Xiaoling Song7, Robert W Owen6, Michael Hoffmeister4, Heiko Becher8, David Shibata3, Kathy Vickers7, Shannon K Rush7, Karen Makar7, Gerd Würtele6, Roswitha Haubner6, Thomas A Sellers3, William Grady7.   

Abstract

Vitamin D and folate are associated with decreased colorectal cancer risk and their association with colorectal cancer prognosis is under investigation. We assessed the levels of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), folate and vitamin B12 in an international pilot study in order to determine variability of these biomarkers based on geographical location. Plasma 25(OH)D3, folate and vitamin B12 concentrations were measured in 149 invasive, newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases from Heidelberg (Germany), Seattle (WA, USA), and Tampa (FL, USA) and in ninety-one age- and sex-matched controls. Their associations with potential predictors were assessed using multivariate linear regression analyses. Plasma 25(OH)D3, folate and vitamin B12 concentrations differed by location. Other predictors were season for 25(OH)D3 and tumour stage (vitamin B12). Season-corrected average 25(OH)D3 concentrations were higher in Heidelberg (31·7 ng/ml; range 11·0-83·0 ng/ml) than in Seattle (23·3 ng/ml; range 4·0-80·0 ng/ml) and Tampa (21·1 ng/ml; range 4·6-51·6 ng/ml). In Heidelberg, a strong seasonal variation was observed. Folate (11·1 ng/ml) and vitamin B12 (395 pg/ml) concentrations in Heidelberg were lower than those in Seattle (25·3 ng/ml and 740 pg/ml, respectively) and Tampa (23·8 ng/ml and 522 pg/ml, respectively). Differences in plasma 25(OH)D3 and folate concentrations between Heidelberg and the US sites were observed, probably reflecting variation in outdoor activities and sun-avoidance behaviour during summer as well as in folic acid fortification and supplement use. Intra-site differences at each study location were greater than between-location variability, suggesting that individual health behaviours play a significant role. Nevertheless, the intra-site differences we observed may be due to chance because of the limited sample size. Our pilot study illustrates the value of an international cohort in studying colorectal cancer prognosis to discern geographical differences in a broad range of exposures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3; Colorectal cancer; DACHS, Darmkrebs Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening; Folate; Survival; Vitamin B12; Vitamin D

Year:  2013        PMID: 25191595      PMCID: PMC4153124          DOI: 10.1017/jns.2012.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Sci        ISSN: 2048-6790


Vitamin D and folate are critical for cell signalling and functioning and can influence processes related to cancer risk and prognosis( , ). The anti-carcinogenic effects of vitamin D are mediated through its diverse effects on cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis( ). Folate and other B vitamins such as vitamin B12 play important roles as co-factors in one-carbon metabolism, which is essential for nucleotide synthesis and DNA methylation( , ). Disruption of these processes leads to abnormalities in DNA methylation and imbalance of DNA precursors, leading to aberrant DNA synthesis and repair( , ). Globally, colorectal cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the third one in men( ). Studies have demonstrated that a higher pre-diagnostic vitamin D status is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk( – ) and there is emerging evidence that higher plasma vitamin D concentrations can also improve survival in patients with colorectal cancer( , ). On the other hand, folate appears to have a dual effect on colorectal carcinogenesis, depending on the timing and dosage( – ). In normal colorectal epithelial cells, folate deficiency predisposes to colorectal carcinogenesis whereas in established neoplasms, folate deficiency appears to have an inhibitory effect on colorectal carcinogenesis and high folate levels may promote the growth of an existing cancer( , , , ). Vitamin B12 is an important co-factor in folate metabolism but studies relating plasma vitamin B12 to colorectal cancer risk and prognosis are relatively very few and results equivocal( , ). Because there is paucity of information on how these nutritional biomarkers impact on colorectal cancer survival, more studies are needed to discern their effects. Plasma vitamin biomarker levels may vary based on dietary and other health-related practices in different countries. However, studies comparing this wide range of vitamin biomarker levels across geographical regions are scarce. A characterisation of this variability may be important for studying the association of these biomarkers with colorectal cancer prognosis. In order to discern geographical differences in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), folate and vitamin B12, we evaluated levels and predictors among colorectal cancer cases and controls in an international pilot study with participants from Heidelberg (Germany), Seattle (WA, USA), and Tampa (FL, USA).

Methods

Study groups

The study participants from the USA are members of a colorectal cancer prognosis study (ColoCare), with sites at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (WA, USA), H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa (FL, USA), and the National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg (Germany). The objective of our consortium is to identify the factors that determine short-term survival in a prospective cohort of colorectal cancer patients. These include inherited genetic and tumour characteristics that affect early detection, treatment response and prognosis as well as health behaviours that patients adopt that may have health outcomes. German samples included in this pilot study were obtained from participants of the Darmkrebs Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening (DACHS) study at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg (Germany)( ). Samples included from Tampa were collected as part of Moffitt's Total Cancer Care Program( ). Eligible for the study were colorectal cancer patients, at least 18 years of age, with a first diagnosis of invasive colon or rectal cancer (stages I–IV) receiving care at any of the ColoCare consortium/DACHS sites. This pilot study involved 149 colorectal cancer cases and ninety-one age- and sex-matched controls (Heidelberg, forty cases and forty controls; Seattle, ninety-one cases and thirty-three frequency-matched controls; Tampa, eighteen cases and eighteen controls), recruited between the years 2006 and 2010 and whose biospecimens were obtained within the same time frame with identical blood-draw protocols at each of the sites. Blood samples were obtained at the time of recruitment into the study. For the cases, the samples were pre-treatment samples obtained at the time of surgery. In the DACHS study, control subjects were community-based and randomly selected from population registries. They were frequency-matched to cases on age, sex and county of residence. We excluded controls with a history of colorectal cancer; otherwise eligibility criteria were the same as for the cases. Controls were contacted through mail and follow-up calls, and interviews were conducted at their homes. The participation rate among eligible control participants was a little higher than 50 %( ). The controls in Moffitt, Tampa were frequency matched to the cases on age (5-year intervals), sex and race (white non-Hispanic). Controls in Seattle were drawn from participants in a screening and surveillance colonoscopy programme who had no evidence of pathology within the colon and were matched to the cases for age, sex and race. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down by the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (WA, USA) and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa (FL, USA). Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects.

Laboratory analysis

Plasma 25(OH)D3 was measured by reverse-phase HPLC in the Biochemistry and Biomarkers Laboratory of the Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ (Dr Owen). The intra-assay and inter-assay CV of 25(OH)D3 at a concentration of 50 ng/ml were 2·3 and 3·1 %, respectively. Plasma folate and vitamin B12 were quantified using SimulTRAC® B12/FOLATE – SNB 57Co/125I Radioassay Kit (MP Biomedicals) in the Biomarker Laboratory (Dr Song) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center with intra-assay CV of 3·1 and 3·5 % and inter-assay CV of 7·0 and 5·1 % for folate and vitamin B12, respectively.

Statistical analysis

To account for skewed distributions, Wilcoxon or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to test for the differences in biomarker concentration by age group (18–59, 60–69 and 70–80 years), case status, tumour stage (I–IV), study site (Heidelberg, Seattle and Tampa), and season of blood draw (spring: March–May; summer: June–August; autumn: September–November; winter: December–February). Because the samples were unequally distributed across seasons at the three study sites, we computed season-corrected levels for the descriptive analyses of 25(OH)D3 in order to give equal weight to all four seasons. Linear regression analysis (using both forward stepwise and enter methods) with log-transformed outcome parameters was used for multivariate analyses. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (V9.1.2, SAS Institute Inc.). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0·05 and all statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Cases and controls were, on average, aged 60·0 (sd 13·3) and 60·9 (sd 13·1) years, respectively. The majority of tumours were of stages III (39·6 %) and IV (26·2 %). Among the cases, the mean 25(OH)D3, folate and vitamin B12 concentrations were 25·6 (sd 13·5) ng/ml, 21·6 (sd 14·0) ng/ml, and 638 (sd 597) pg/ml, respectively, whereas among the controls, they were 25·9 (sd 14·0) ng/ml, 18·0 (sd 13·7) ng/ml, and 515 (sd 241) pg/ml (Table 1).
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of colorectal cancer cases and controls

Cases (n 149)Controls (n 91)
Characteristic n % n %
Study site
Heidelberg4026·84044·0
Seattle9161·13336·3
Tampa1812·11819·8
Age (years)
Mean6061
sd 1313
18–5964433640
60–6947323235
70–9038262325
Sex
Male80544853
Female69464347
Race
White, non-Hispanic137928492
Non-white or other12878
Tumour stage
I (I, IA, IB and IC)2013·4
II (II, IIA, IIB and IIC)3020·1
III (III, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC)5939·6
IV3926·2
Unknown10·7
Season of blood draw
Spring (March–May)2718·12325·3
Summer (June–August)3221·52527·5
Autumn (September–November)4429·52325·3
Winter (December–February)4630·92022·0
Nutritional biomarker
25(OH)D3 (ng/ml)
Mean25·625·9
sd 13·514·0
Range4·6–80·04·0–83·0
Folate (ng/ml)
Mean21·618·0
sd 14·013·7
Range0·3–70·31·4–62·5
Vitamin B12 (pg/ml)
Mean638515
sd 597241
Range96–375094–1352

25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.

Baseline characteristics of colorectal cancer cases and controls 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. In multivariate modelling, significant predictors for the biomarkers included season for 25(OH)D3, study site for 25(OH)D3, folate, vitamin B12, and tumour stage for vitamin B12 (Table 2). Probably because of the limited sample size of this pilot study, case status was not statistically significant as a predictor; hence, cases and controls were combined in subsequent analyses. Also, the results from models excluding case-status were identical to those including case-status in the model. The association from controls only was similar, yet did not reach statistical significance. Plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations were, on average, higher in Heidelberg (31·7 ng/ml; range 11·0–83·0 ng/ml) than in Seattle (23·3 ng/ml; range 4·0–80·0 ng/ml) and Tampa (21·1 ng/ml; range 4·6–51·6 ng/ml) (Table 3). Hypovitaminosis D (plasma 25(OH)D3 <20 ng/ml) was more prevalent in Tampa (54 %) and Seattle (50 %) than in Heidelberg (23 %) (data not shown). On the other hand, plasma folate concentrations were, on average, lower in Heidelberg (11·1 ng/ml; range 0·3–48·2 ng/ml) than in Seattle (25·3 ng/ml; range 3·5–70·3 ng/ml) and Tampa (23·8 ng/ml; range 6·8–69·7 ng/ml). No participants from Seattle and Tampa had folate deficiency (folate <3 ng/ml), while 10 % of those from Heidelberg had folate deficiency. Plasma vitamin B12 concentrations followed the same pattern as folate with lower average values recorded in Heidelberg (395 pg/ml; range 96–1641 pg/ml) than in Seattle (740 pg/ml; range 183–3750 pg/ml) and Tampa (522 pg/ml; range 94–1085 pg/ml).
Table 2.

Predictors of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), vitamin B12 and folate among colorectal cancer cases and controls†

BiomarkerPredictorDirectionSignificance
25(OH)D3Heidelberg+**
Summer season+**
Autumn season+*
Vitamin B12Heidelberg**
Stage IV+**
FolateHeidelberg**
Age 60–69 years+*

* P < 0·10, ** P < 0·05.

Cases and controls were combined because case status was not statistically significant.

Table 3.

Nutritional biomarker concentrations among colorectal cancer cases and controls in the three study locations

(Mean values and ranges)

HeidelbergSeattleTampa
MeanRangeMeanRangeMeanRange
25(OH)D3 (ng/ml)31·711·0, 83·023·34·0, 80·021·14·6, 51·6
Folate (ng/ml)11·10·3, 48·225·33·5, 70·323·86·8, 69·7
Vitamin B12 (pg/ml)39596, 1641740183, 375052294, 1085

25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.

Predictors of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), vitamin B12 and folate among colorectal cancer cases and controls† * P < 0·10, ** P < 0·05. Cases and controls were combined because case status was not statistically significant. Nutritional biomarker concentrations among colorectal cancer cases and controls in the three study locations (Mean values and ranges) 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Seasonal differences in plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations were evident in Heidelberg, where the highest plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations were observed in summer (37·0 ng/ml) and the lowest in spring (21·3 ng/ml), but no such seasonal variation was noted in Seattle and Tampa (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

(a) Plasma vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D; 25(OH)D) concentration by study site. (b) Plasma folate concentration by study site. (c) Plasma vitamin B12 concentration by study site. The horizontal bars represent medians and the circles represent potential outliers in the data. (d) Seasonal plasma 25(OH)D by study site: , spring; , summer; , autumn; , winter. Values are means.

(a) Plasma vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D; 25(OH)D) concentration by study site. (b) Plasma folate concentration by study site. (c) Plasma vitamin B12 concentration by study site. The horizontal bars represent medians and the circles represent potential outliers in the data. (d) Seasonal plasma 25(OH)D by study site: , spring; , summer; , autumn; , winter. Values are means.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare a range of nutritional biomarkers (25(OH)D3, folate and vitamin B12) among colorectal cancer patients and controls in different geographical regions. Our international pilot study revealed differences in biomarker concentrations between the US sites and Germany. Because dietary sources of vitamin D are very limited, cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D (within the UVB wavelength of 290–315 nm) is a very important source of plasma 25(OH)D3( ). The UV radiation required for the synthesis of vitamin D in the skin is more abundant and more functional during summer than during winter( , ). Hence, among people who do not use adequate vitamin D supplements or consume vitamin D-fortified foods, season is one of the most important determinants of plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations. Thus, the seasonal variations in plasma 25(OH)D3 observed in Heidelberg are in line with expectations. Somewhat surprising is the lack of seasonal variation and the low plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations observed in Seattle and Tampa. Of the three sites, Tampa has the highest daytime temperatures during summer but the participants from Tampa had the lowest plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations during summer. The differences in plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration during summer among participants in our study could reflect the extent of outdoor activities and possible sun-avoidance behaviours (including sunscreen use) in the three cities. In Heidelberg, people are more likely to commute with bicycles or walk than use cars, whereas people are more likely to practise sun-avoidance in Florida( ). Few studies have examined the impact of season on 25(OH)D3 concentrations in lower altitude regions in the USA. Although a previous study in South Florida reported a seasonal variation in serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations( ), the magnitude (14 %) is much smaller than what is observed (38 %) among residents of northern latitudes in the USA( , ). Compared with the previous study from South Florida, the winter 25(OH)D3 concentrations among participants from Tampa in our study are identical (23·3 v. 23·1 ng/ml, respectively) but the summer concentrations were lower (17·7 v. 26·8 ng/ml). Thus, the low summer 25(OH)D3 concentrations in Tampa could be a chance finding due to the low number of participants from Tampa in our study. Studies have revealed that current food fortification practices in the USA may not be adequate to prevent vitamin D deficiency among vulnerable people during winter( , ). Likewise, it has been shown that although supplement use increases serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations, it does not make up for insufficient sun exposure( ), and current supplement recommendations are not adequate to prevent vitamin D deficiency( ). As vitamin D supplementation is discussed in the context of improving survival in colorectal cancer patients( , ), our study shows that high plasma vitamin D concentrations can be achieved in populations with substantial outdoor activity during summer (such as Heidelberg). Nevertheless, vitamin D fortification in the USA did not prevent low levels of serum 25(OH)D3 in Tampa or Seattle, cities that practise sun-avoidance or reduced sun exposure. The lower plasma folate concentrations among participants from Heidelberg compared with those from the USA are not unexpected considering the fact that mandatory fortification of staple foods with folic acid commenced in the USA in 1998( ) while fortification is not practised in Germany( ). The mandatory fortification programme has resulted in a substantial increase in plasma folate concentrations in the USA, where the prevalence estimates for low serum folate concentrations (<3 ng/ml) declined from 20·6 % in the period 1988–1994 to 0·6 % in 2004( ). However, we also observed large intra-site differences in plasma folate and vitamin B12 concentrations at each study site. This may be due mostly to the use of folic acid-containing supplements. It has been shown that supplement and multivitamin use is higher among cancer patients compared with the general population( ). Between 64 and 81 % of cancer patients use any vitamin or mineral supplement, compared with 50 % in the general population( ). In a large study in Washington state, USA, colorectal cancer patients were 33 % more likely to use folic acid supplements compared with cancer-free controls( ) and such a supplement use is associated with higher plasma folate and vitamin B12 concentrations( ). Therefore, the use of folic acid-containing supplements is an important determinant of plasma folate concentrations in colorectal cancer patients. This may be of potential concern considering the fact that very high plasma folate concentrations that can be achieved with supplement use may accelerate the growth of already existing colorectal cancers( ). In a randomised controlled trial, folic acid given at a dosage of 1 mg/d was associated with a 1·7-fold increased risk of advanced colorectal cancers( ), thus excluding its utility and safety as a secondary or tertiary prevention agent for colorectal cancer. However, this is an area of ongoing research and further studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between folate and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. A particular strength of our study is the comparison of biomarkers across international study sites with identical laboratories for assays and consistent blood-draw protocols. However, our sample size as well as variable set was limited and we had no information on supplement use; hence we could not investigate the association of supplement use with nutritional biomarker concentrations. In conclusion, we observed substantial differences in nutritional biomarker concentrations across international study sites, probably reflecting dissimilarities in supplement use, food fortification, and sun-seeking behaviour, among other health practices. However, intra-site differences at each study location were larger than between-location variability, suggesting that individual health behaviours play a significant role. As we aim to understand predictors of colorectal cancer prognosis, there is much to learn from international cohorts, which offer a broad range of exposure and health behaviours that cannot be obtained at a single site.
  31 in total

1.  Folate and cancer--timing is everything.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ulrich; John D Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Assessing the vitamin D status of the US population.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Yetley
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Geographic location and vitamin D synthesis.

Authors:  Michael G Kimlin
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2008-08-28

4.  Vitamin d deficiency and seasonal variation in an adult South Florida population.

Authors:  Silvina Levis; Angela Gomez; Camilo Jimenez; Luis Veras; Fangchao Ma; Shenghan Lai; Bruce Hollis; Bernard A Roos
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs.

Authors:  Mona S Calvo; Susan J Whiting; Curtis N Barton
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Folic acid source, usual intake, and folate and vitamin B-12 status in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Mary E Cogswell; Heather C Hamner; Alicia Carriquiry; Lynn B Bailey; Christine M Pfeiffer; Robert J Berry
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Folate is absorbed across the colon of adults: evidence from cecal infusion of (13)C-labeled [6S]-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid.

Authors:  Susanne Aufreiter; Jesse F Gregory; Christine M Pfeiffer; Zia Fazili; Young-In Kim; Norman Marcon; Patarapong Kamalaporn; Paul B Pencharz; Deborah L O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bernard F Cole; John A Baron; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; Dennis J Ahnen; Robert S Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Robert W Summers; Richard I Rothstein; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Timothy R Church; John I Allen; Douglas J Robertson; Gerald J Beck; John H Bond; Tim Byers; Jack S Mandel; Leila A Mott; Loretta H Pearson; Elizabeth L Barry; Judy R Rees; Norman Marcon; Fred Saibil; Per Magne Ueland; E Robert Greenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Demographic differences and trends of vitamin D insufficiency in the US population, 1988-2004.

Authors:  Adit A Ginde; Mark C Liu; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-23

10.  Association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in European populations:a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Mazda Jenab; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Pietro Ferrari; Franzel J B van Duijnhoven; Teresa Norat; Tobias Pischon; Eugène H J M Jansen; Nadia Slimani; Graham Byrnes; Sabina Rinaldi; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Sophie Morois; Rudolf Kaaks; Jakob Linseisen; Heiner Boeing; Manuela M Bergmann; Antonia Trichopoulou; Gesthimani Misirli; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Franco Berrino; Paolo Vineis; Salvatore Panico; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Martine M Ros; Carla H van Gils; Petra H Peeters; Magritt Brustad; Eiliv Lund; María-José Tormo; Eva Ardanaz; Laudina Rodríguez; Maria-José Sánchez; Miren Dorronsoro; Carlos A Gonzalez; Göran Hallmans; Richard Palmqvist; Andrew Roddam; Timothy J Key; Kay-Tee Khaw; Philippe Autier; Pierre Hainaut; Elio Riboli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Associations with Physical Activity.

Authors:  Stephanie Skender; Jürgen Böhm; Petra Schrotz-King; Jenny Chang-Claude; Erin M Siegel; Karen Steindorf; Robert W Owen; Jennifer Ose; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.900

2.  The ColoCare Study: A Paradigm of Transdisciplinary Science in Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ulrich; Biljana Gigic; Graham A Colditz; Jane C Figueiredo; William M Grady; Christopher I Li; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Adetunji T Toriola; Alexis Ulrich; Jürgen Böhm; Jennifer Ose; Richard Viskochil; Martin Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.254

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.