| Literature DB >> 25191313 |
Thomas M Lux1, Rob Lee1, John Love1.
Abstract
We recently reported the genome sequence of a free-living strain of Vibrio furnissii (NCTC 11218) harvested from an estuarine environment. V. furnissii is a widespread, free-living proteobacterium and emerging pathogen that can cause acute gastroenteritis in humans and lethal zoonoses in aquatic invertebrates, including farmed crustaceans and molluscs. Here we present the analyses to assess the potential pathogenic impact of V. furnissii. We compared the complete genome of V. furnissii with 8 other emerging and pathogenic Vibrio species. We selected and analyzed more deeply 10 genomic regions based upon unique or common features, and used 3 of these regions to construct a phylogenetic tree. Thus, we positioned V. furnissii more accurately than before and revealed a closer relationship between V. furnissii and V. cholerae than previously thought. However, V. furnissii lacks several important features normally associated with virulence in the human pathogens V. cholera and V. vulnificus. A striking feature of the V. furnissii genome is the hugely increased Super Integron, compared to the other Vibrio. Analyses of predicted genomic islands resulted in the discovery of a protein sequence that is present only in Vibrio associated with diseases in aquatic animals. We also discovered evidence of high levels horizontal gene transfer in V. furnissii. V. furnissii seems therefore to have a dynamic and fluid genome that could quickly adapt to environmental perturbation or increase its pathogenicity. Taken together, these analyses confirm the potential of V. furnissii as an emerging marine and possible human pathogen, especially in the developing, tropical, coastal regions that are most at risk from climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Vibrio furnissii; emerging pathogens; genome comparison; genome phylogeny; horizontal gene transfer; pathogenicity islands; phylogenetic analysis
Year: 2014 PMID: 25191313 PMCID: PMC4139957 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Diagrammatic Representation of the From outside to inside: Predicted ORFs on V. furnissii forward strand (track 1) and reverse strand (track 2). Green represents 100–80% amino acid identity; Orange, 80–60% identity and Red below 60% identity; COG classification (track 3; Information storage and processing: pink, Cellular processes and signaling: yellow, Metabolism: blue, Poorly characterized: Gray, No hits: black), TMH and SP prediction (track 4; Blue: THM, Light green: SP; Brown: THM+SP), representation of phylogenetic trees (track 5; Red: 3–10 species per leaf; Green: 11–100 species per leaf; Blue: 101–1000 species per leaf; Cyan: 1001 to END species per leaf), NUCMER comparison of 8 bacteria: V. cholerae O1 biovar El Tor strain N16961 (track 6), V. cholerae O395 (track 7), V. parahaemolyticus strain RIMD 2210633 (track 8), V. vulnificus strain CMCP6 (track 9), V. harveyi strain ATCC BAA-1116 (track 10), V. splendidus strain LGP32 (track 11), Listonella (Vibrio) anguillarum 775 (track 12) and Photobacterium profundum strain SS9 (track 13), against V. furnissii (regions sharing more than 80% identity are illustrated by bars; red hues represent human associated, green hues represent invertebrate and fish associated, and blue hues represent fish associated pathogens; darker color for identical regions on chromosome I, lighter color for chromosome II), GC plot (track 14; Window size: 10,000, Step size 200).
Figure 2Phylogenetic trees based on (A) 16S rRNA, (B) from concatenated nucleotide sequences from regions R1, R2 and R3 and (C) based on .
Figure 3Comparison of the Super Integrons of .
Number of identified GEI in .
| 6 | 5 | 4 | – | – | – | |
| 11 | 5 | 2 | 3 | – | – | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | – | – | |
| 16 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| 17 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | – | |
| 24 | 10 | 4 | 2 | – | – | |
| 30 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 9 | – | |
| 19 | 8 | 7 | 2 | – | – | |
| 12 | 17 | 7 | 4 | – | – | |
Figure 4Phylogenetic trees of the . Numbers representing branch support values.
Figure 5Phylogenetic trees of the . Numbers representing branch support values.