Literature DB >> 25190594

Applicability of fluidized bed reactor in recalcitrant compound degradation through advanced oxidation processes: a review.

Farhana Tisa1, Abdul Aziz Abdul Raman2, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan Daud1.   

Abstract

Treatment of industrial waste water (e.g. textile waste water, phenol waste water, pharmaceutical etc) faces limitation in conventional treatment procedures. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) do not suffer from the limits of conventional treatment processes and consequently degrade toxic pollutants more efficiently. Complexity is faced in eradicating the restrictions of AOPs such as sludge formation, toxic intermediates formation and high requirement for oxidants. Increased mass-transfer in AOPs is an alternate solution to this problem. AOPs combined with Fluidized bed reactor (FBR) can be a potential choice compared to fixed bed or moving bed reactor, as AOP catalysts life-span last for only maximum of 5-10 cycles. Hence, FBR-AOPs require lesser operational and maintenance cost by reducing material resources. The time required for AOP can be minimized using FBR and also treatable working volume can be increased. FBR-AOP can process from 1 to 10 L of volume which is 10 times more than simple batch reaction. The mass transfer is higher thus the reaction time is lesser. For having increased mass transfer sludge production can be successfully avoided. The review study suggests that, optimum particle size, catalyst to reactor volume ratio, catalyst diameter and liquid or gas velocity is required for efficient FBR-AOP systems. However, FBR-AOPs are still under lab-scale investigation and for industrial application cost study is needed. Cost of FBR-AOPs highly depends on energy density needed and the mechanism of degradation of the pollutant. The cost of waste water treatment containing azo dyes was found to be US$ 50 to US$ 500 per 1000 gallons where, the cost for treating phenol water was US$ 50 to US$ 800 per 1000 gallons. The analysis for FBR-AOP costs has been found to depend on the targeted pollutant, degradation mechanism (zero order, 1st order and 2nd order) and energy consumptions by the AOPs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced oxidation processes; Cost estimation; Fluidized bed reactor; Waste water treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190594     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Emerging trends in photodegradation of petrochemical wastes: a review.

Authors:  Pardeep Singh; Ankita Ojha; Anwesha Borthakur; Rishikesh Singh; D Lahiry; Dhanesh Tiwary; Pradeep Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  TiO2 structures doped with noble metals and/or graphene oxide to improve the photocatalytic degradation of dichloroacetic acid.

Authors:  Paula Ribao; Maria J Rivero; Inmaculada Ortiz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Degradation of organic contaminants in effluents-synthetic and from the textile industry-by Fenton, photocatalysis, and H2O2 photolysis.

Authors:  L B de Lima; L O Pereira; S G de Moura; F Magalhães
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A fluidized-bed reactor for the photocatalytic mineralization of phenol on TiO2-coated silica gel.

Authors:  Guillermo J Rincón; Enrique J La Motta
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-25

5.  Oxidative Degradation of Methylene Blue via PDS-Based Advanced Oxidation Process Using Natural Pyrite.

Authors:  Liang Sun; Dehao Hu; Ziyu Zhang; Xiaoyan Deng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.