Literature DB >> 25190409

Comparison of predictive measures of speech recognition after noise reduction processing.

Karolina Smeds1, Arne Leijon1, Florian Wolters1, Anders Hammarstedt1, Sara Båsjö1, Sofia Hertzman1.   

Abstract

A number of measures were evaluated with regard to their ability to predict the speech-recognition benefit of single-channel noise reduction (NR) processing. Three NR algorithms and a reference condition were used in the evaluation. Twenty listeners with impaired hearing and ten listeners with normal hearing participated in a blinded laboratory study. An adaptive speech test was used. The speech test produces results in terms of signal-to-noise ratios that correspond to equal speech recognition performance (in this case 80% correct) with and without the NR algorithms. This facilitates a direct comparison between predicted and experimentally measured effects of noise reduction algorithms on speech recognition. The experimental results were used to evaluate nine different predictive measures, one in two variants. The best predictions were found with the Coherence Speech Intelligibility Index (CSII) [Kates and Arehart (2005), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(4), 2224-2237]. In general, measures using correlation between the clean speech and the processed noisy speech, as well as other measures that are based on short-time analysis of speech and noise, seemed most promising.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190409     DOI: 10.1121/1.4892766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  1 in total

1.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.