Literature DB >> 25190281

The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit.

Enrico Ferrazzi1, Elena Visconti, Andrea M Paganelli, Carmen M Campi, Cristina Lazzeri, Federico Cirillo, Stefania Livio, Cinzia Piola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze maternal and neonatal outcomes of midwife-led labor in low-risk women at term.
METHODS: Prospective observational cohort of 1788 singleton low-risk pregnancies in spontaneous term labor, managed according to a specific midwife-led labor protocol. Primary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, 3rd-4th degree lacerations, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), need for blood transfusions, pH and Apgar score and NICU admissions.
RESULTS: A total 1754 low-risk women (50.3% of all deliveries) were included in the analysis. Epidural analgesia was performed in 29.8% of cases. The rate of cesarean section was 3.7%. Episiotomy was performed in 17.6% of women. PPH > 1000 ml occurred in 1.7% of cases. 3.2% and 0.3% of the cases had an Apgar score <7 and pH < 7.10, respectively, while 0.3% of the newborns were admitted to NICU. Consultant-led labor was required for emerging risk factors during 1st and 2nd stage of labor in 16.1 and 8.6% of cases, respectively. Although maternal outcome were worse in women with emerging risk factors in labor, while neonatal outcomes were not affected by the presence these complications.
CONCLUSIONS: In hospital settings, midwife-led labor in low-risk women might unfold its major advantages without additional risks of medicalization for the mother and the neonate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apgar score; cesarean section; labor and delivery; midwifery; women's health issues

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190281     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.958995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  3 in total

1.  Perspectives of Italian pregnant women on pregnancy examinations and pregnancy care: is the caregiver more important than the care?

Authors:  Ugo Indraccolo; Simona Cona; Alexandra Nistor; Salvatore Renato Indraccolo; Romolo Di Iorio; Piergiorgio Fedeli; Carlo De Angelis
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Tengteng Li; Nafei Guo; Hui Jiang; Yuehong Li; Chenying Xu; Xiao Yao
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.