Literature DB >> 25190271

The effectiveness of a pressure ulcer intervention program on the prevalence of hospital acquired pressure ulcers: controlled before and after study.

Zeinab Mallah1, Nada Nassar1, Lina Kurdahi Badr2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pressure Ulcers (PUs) are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and health care costs. In addition to being costly, PrUs cause pain, suffering, infection, a lower quality of life, extended hospital stay and even death. Although several nursing interventions have been advocated in the literature, there is a paucity of research on what constitutes the most effective nursing intervention.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of multidisciplinary intervention and to assess which component of the intervention was most predictive of decreasing the prevalence of Hospital acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) in a tertiary setting in Lebanon.
DESIGN: An evaluation prospective research design was utilized with data before and after the intervention. The sample consisted of 468 patients admitted to the hospital from January 2012 to April 2013.
RESULTS: The prevalence of HAPU was significantly reduced from 6.63% in 2012 to 2.47. Sensitivity of the Braden scale in predicting a HAPU was 92.30% and specificity was 60.04%. A logistic multiple regression equation found that two factors significantly predicted the development of a HAPU; skin care and Braden scores.
CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary approach was effective in decreasing the prevalence of HAPUs. Skin care management which was a significant predictor of PUs should alert nurses to the cost effectiveness of this intervention. Lower Braden scores also were predictive of HAPUs. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lebanon; Predictors; Pressure ulcers; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190271     DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  5 in total

1.  Pressure Ulcer Monitoring Platform-A Prospective, Human Subject Clinical Study to Validate Patient Repositioning Monitoring Device to Prevent Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Danielle M Minteer; Patsy Simon; Donald P Taylor; Wenyan Jia; Yuecheng Li; Mingui Sun; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Adherence to evidence-based pressure injury prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Wendy Chaboyer; Tracey Bucknall; Brigid Gillespie; Lukman Thalib; Elizabeth McInnes; Julie Considine; Edel Murray; Paula Duffy; Michelle Tuck; Emma Harbeck
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Risk of readmissions, mortality, and hospital-acquired conditions across hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) stages in a US National Hospital Discharge database.

Authors:  Christina L Wassel; Gary Delhougne; Julie A Gayle; Jill Dreyfus; Barrett Larson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.

Authors:  William V Padula; Benjo A Delarmente
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Improving Outcomes by Implementing a Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program (PUPP): Going beyond the Basics.

Authors:  Amparo Cano; Debbie Anglade; Hope Stamp; Fortunata Joaquin; Jennifer A Lopez; Lori Lupe; Steven P Schmidt; Daniel L Young
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.