Literature DB >> 25190126

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction.

K Parry1, L Haverkamp, R C G Bruijnen, P D Siersema, J P Ruurda, R van Hillegersberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) may undergo either esophagectomy or gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical therapy with regard to postoperative outcome and survival in patients with Siewert type II tumors.
METHODS: A prospective database of 266 consecutive patients with surgically resectable GEJ adenocarcinomas from 2003 to 2013 was analyzed. The surgical approach was based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: According to the histopathological analysis, 67 patients (25 %) had type I tumor, 176 patients (66 %) had type II tumor, and 16 patients (6 %) had type III tumor. In total, 86 % were treated with esophagectomy and 14 % with gastrectomy. Overall 5-year survival was 38 %. In type II patients, the type of operation did not significantly influence overall survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.606). A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) at the site of the esophagus was more common with gastrectomy (29 vs. 11 %; p = 0.025). No significant differences in mortality, morbidity, or disease recurrence were found. In patients with type II tumors, upper mediastinal nodal involvement (subcarinal, paratracheal, and aortapulmonary window) was found in 11 % of the patients. In 34 % of patients treated with esophagectomy, paraesophageal lymph nodes metastases were harvested compared with 5 % of patients treated with gastrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a type II GEJ adenocarcinoma, a positive CRM was more common with gastrectomy. Esophagectomy provides for a more complete para-esophageal lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, the high prevalence of mediastinal nodal involvement indicates that a full lymphadenectomy of these stations should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190126     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4047-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Chen-Bin Lv; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: past, present and future.

Authors:  Gijsbert I van Boxel; B Feike Kingma; Frank J Voskens; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: less is more.

Authors:  Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis; Peter Philipp Grimminger; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jelle Piet-Hein Ruurda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Shiraishi; Takushi Yasuda; Hiroaki Kato; Mitsuru Iwama; Yoko Hiraki; Atsushi Yasuda; Masayuki Shinkai; Yutaka Kimura; Motohiro Imano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Gastro-esophageal junction cancers: what is the best minimally invasive approach?

Authors:  Egle Jezerskyte; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  [Differentiated surgical approach for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction].

Authors:  W Schröder; R Lambertz; R van Hillegesberger; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Western strategy for EGJ carcinoma.

Authors:  Simone Giacopuzzi; Maria Bencivenga; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Giuseppe Verlato; Giovanni de Manzoni
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach?

Authors:  Susanne Blank; Thomas Schmidt; Patrick Heger; Moritz J Strowitzki; Leila Sisic; Ulrike Heger; Henrik Nienhueser; Georg Martin Haag; Thomas Bruckner; André L Mihaljevic; Katja Ott; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Distribution of lymph node metastases in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (cT2-4): comparison between Siewert type I and selected Siewert type II tumors.

Authors:  Akio Sakaki; Jun Kanamori; Koshiro Ishiyama; Daisuke Kurita; Junya Oguma; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.