Literature DB >> 25189340

Dynamic SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model.

R Glenn Wells1, Rachel Timmins2, Ran Klein2, Julia Lockwood2, Brian Marvin2, Robert A deKemp2, Lihui Wei3, Terrence D Ruddy2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information over relative perfusion alone. Recent development of dedicated cardiac SPECT cameras with better sensitivity and temporal resolution make dynamic SPECT imaging more practical. In this study, we evaluate the measurement of MBF using a multipinhole dedicated cardiac SPECT camera in a pig model of rest and transient occlusion at stress using 3 common tracers: (201)Tl, (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin, and (99m)Tc-sestamibi.
METHODS: Animals (n = 19) were injected at rest/stress with (99m)Tc radiotracers (370/1,100 MBq) or (201)Tl (37/110 MBq) with a 1-h delay between rest and dipyridamole stress. With each tracer, microspheres were injected simultaneously as the gold standard measurement for MBF. Dynamic images were obtained for 11 min starting with each injection. Residual resting activity was subtracted from stress data and images reconstructed with CT-based attenuation correction and energy window-based scatter correction. Dynamic images were processed with kinetic analysis software using a 1-tissue-compartment model to obtain the uptake rate constant K(1) as a function of microsphere MBF.
RESULTS: Measured extraction fractions agree with those obtained previously using ex vivo techniques. Converting K(1) back to MBF using the measured extraction fractions produced accurate values and good correlations with microsphere MBF: r = 0.75-0.90 (P < 0.01 for all). The correlation in the MFR was between r = 0.57 and 0.94 (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Noninvasive measurement of absolute MBF with stationary dedicated cardiac SPECT is feasible using common perfusion tracers.
© 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPECT; absolute myocardial blood flow; myocardial perfusion imaging; pig model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189340     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.139782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  47 in total

1.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: The value of nuclear cardiology techniques.

Authors:  Federico Caobelli; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Young-Hak Kim; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang; Jungsu S Oh; Eonwoo Shin; Changhwan Sung; Sun Young Chae; Seung-Jung Park; Gillan Grimberg; Gil Kovalski; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Dynamic SPECT: evolution of a widely available tool for the assessment of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Denis Agostini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Jae Sung Lee; Gil Kovalski; Tali Sharir; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Ljungberg; P Hendrik Pretorius
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Absolute myocardial blood flow vs relative myocardial perfusion: Which one is better?

Authors:  Tali Sharir; Gil Kovalski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Emerging Tracers for Nuclear Cardiac PET Imaging.

Authors:  Dong-Yeon Kim; Sang-Geon Cho; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.