Literature DB >> 25189295

Biosimilar versus patented erythropoietins: learning from 5 years of European and Japanese experience.

François Bocquet1, Pascal Paubel, Isabelle Fusier, Anne-Laure Cordonnier, Martine Sinègre, Claude Le Pen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patent expiries on leading biologics are creating new momentum in the market for biosimilars (copies of off-patent biologics), paving the way for their development. However, little is known about the factors influencing the competition between biosimilars and their reference products (REF).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse key global erythropoietin (EPO) markets and factors affecting biosimilar EPO (BIOSIM-EPO) uptakes, and to identify countries where BIOSIM-EPOs have gained significant market shares.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria for countries in the study were a biosimilar regulatory framework similar to the EU framework, and biological market value higher than US$2.5 billion. Factors evaluated included EPO market size, EPO retail/hospital distribution mix, national incentives to use biosimilars and BIOSIM-EPO/REF price differences. IMS Health provided EPO consumption in volumes, values, and EPO ex-manufacturer prices from 2007 to 2012.
RESULTS: Japan: large-sized market, mixed retail/hospital distribution, no incentives, low BIOSIM-EPO uptake (6.8 % in 2012). France: large-sized market, dominant retail distribution, no incentives, low BIOSIM-EPO uptake (5.8 %). Spain and Italy: medium-sized market, dominant hospital distribution, no incentives, moderate BIOSIM-EPO uptakes (11.5 and 8.6 %). Germany: small-sized market, dominant retail distribution, presence of incentives, high BIOSIM-EPO uptake (30.4 %). UK: small-sized market, mixed retail/hospital distribution, no incentives, low BIOSIM-EPO uptake (2.0 %). BIOSIM-EPO/REF price differences play no role at a global level (-10.8 % in Germany and -26.9 % in Japan).
CONCLUSIONS: EPO markets have proven to be highly country-specific. EPO market sizes, EPO retail/hospital distribution mixes and BIOSIM-EPO/REF price differences may not be determining factors of BIOSIM-EPO uptakes. Prescription and substitution incentives to use BIOSIM-EPO appear to be determining factors in Germany. The heterogeneity of national EPO markets makes it impossible to outline country profile types with significant BIOSIM-EPO penetrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25189295     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  8 in total

1.  Knowledge, behaviors and practices of community and hospital pharmacists towards biosimilar medicines: Results of a French web-based survey.

Authors:  Morgane Beck; Bruno Michel; Marie-Christine Rybarczyk-Vigouret; Dominique Levêque; Christelle Sordet; Jean Sibilia; Michel Velten
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of Biosimilars: What Is There to Gain from Them?

Authors:  Filipe C Araújo; João Gonçalves; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Competition Between Biosimilars and Patented Biologics: Learning from European and Japanese Experience.

Authors:  François Bocquet; Anaïs Loubière; Isabelle Fusier; Anne-Laure Cordonnier; Pascal Paubel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Sem Tamara; Maurits A den Boer; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 5.  Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars.

Authors:  George Dranitsaris; Ira Jacobs; Carol Kirchhoff; Robert Popovian; Lesley G Shane
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-09-29

6.  Key drivers for market penetration of biosimilars in Europe.

Authors:  Cécile Rémuzat; Julie Dorey; Olivier Cristeau; Dan Ionescu; Guerric Radière; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-01-30

7.  An Integrated Approach for a Structural and Functional Evaluation of Biosimilars: Implications for Erythropoietin.

Authors:  Alessandra Gianoncelli; Sara A Bonini; Michela Bertuzzi; Michela Guarienti; Sara Vezzoli; Rajesh Kumar; Andrea Delbarba; Andrea Mastinu; Sandra Sigala; Pierfranco Spano; Luca Pani; Sergio Pecorelli; Maurizio Memo
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?

Authors:  Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Adrian Towse; Mikel Berdud
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.