OBJECTIVES: High-resolution MR angiography (HR-MRA) demonstrates blood flow in the digital arteries, which correlates with the severity of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). This study investigates whether baseline HR-MRA of the hand can predict the treatment response to udenafil, a new PDE5-inhibitor, in patients with secondary RP. METHODS: Baseline MRA and Doppler ultrasound were obtained in 12 patients with secondary RP. The patients were treated with udenafil 100 mg/day for 4 weeks and changes in blood flow were measured. Blood flow on MRA was scored on a 4-point scale: 0, no visible flow; 1, visible flow to the proximal phalanx; 2, to the middle phalanx; and 3, to the distal phalanx. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured to determine blood flow. Paired t-test and ANOVA were used to determine the treatment response of the different MRA scores. RESULTS: On baseline MRA, 53.3% of digital arteries had an MRA score of 0, 25.8% MRA score of 1, 9.2% MRA score of 2, and 11.6% MRA score of 3. Overall, 4-week udenafil treatment improved digital flow (p<0.05) in all MRA scores. Digital arteries with MRA score 2 showed the best response with improvement in PSV by 14.5 mm/sec (p<0.01), whereas improvement in arteries of MRA scores 1 and 3 were not better than an MRA score of 0 (all, p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Digital arteries with moderate blood flow observed on MRA respond best to treatment with udenalfil. Therefore, baseline MRA may help predict treatment response in patients with secondary RP.
OBJECTIVES: High-resolution MR angiography (HR-MRA) demonstrates blood flow in the digital arteries, which correlates with the severity of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). This study investigates whether baseline HR-MRA of the hand can predict the treatment response to udenafil, a new PDE5-inhibitor, in patients with secondary RP. METHODS: Baseline MRA and Doppler ultrasound were obtained in 12 patients with secondary RP. The patients were treated with udenafil 100 mg/day for 4 weeks and changes in blood flow were measured. Blood flow on MRA was scored on a 4-point scale: 0, no visible flow; 1, visible flow to the proximal phalanx; 2, to the middle phalanx; and 3, to the distal phalanx. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured to determine blood flow. Paired t-test and ANOVA were used to determine the treatment response of the different MRA scores. RESULTS: On baseline MRA, 53.3% of digital arteries had an MRA score of 0, 25.8% MRA score of 1, 9.2% MRA score of 2, and 11.6% MRA score of 3. Overall, 4-week udenafil treatment improved digital flow (p<0.05) in all MRA scores. Digital arteries with MRA score 2 showed the best response with improvement in PSV by 14.5 mm/sec (p<0.01), whereas improvement in arteries of MRA scores 1 and 3 were not better than an MRA score of 0 (all, p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Digital arteries with moderate blood flow observed on MRA respond best to treatment with udenalfil. Therefore, baseline MRA may help predict treatment response in patients with secondary RP.
Authors: John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Flemming Forsberg; Fabian A Mendoza-Ballesteros; Andrej Lyshchik Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 2.998