Literature DB >> 25189127

The Internet: What are our patients exposed to when considering breast reconstruction following mastectomy?

Amy Light1, Colin Munro2, William Breakey3, Adam Critchley4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The exponential increase in internet use has transformed the healthcare provider-patient relationship. There is a need to guide patients. This study analyses the information available, clinicians approach and patients' experiences.
METHODS: An internet search, "breast reconstruction after mastectomy" was performed on Google and Bing search engines. The first 100 sites on each search were analysed. Target audience, provider and readability were assessed. Modified Health on the Net criterion was used to assess quality. Additionally clinicians and patients were surveyed about their experiences.
RESULTS: Private companies dominated, accounting for 67% of sites, the majority advertised private healthcare groups. Of "information pages", 16% were government sites and 9% were from professional bodies but 28% were private. Blogs had high rates of surreptitious advertising. Patients wanted guidance on which sites to use. Endorsed sites were commonly recommended and used despite only accounting for 13 of the 100 sites.
CONCLUSION: The internet is a powerful tool for disseminating information. There is a wide variety of information presented on breast reconstruction following mastectomy from a range of providers with different interests. Patients should not only be provided with a list of internet resources but also counselled on the types of information they may encounter.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Decision making; Information provision; Internet

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189127     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  3 in total

1.  What Does "Dr. Google" Show Patients Searching for Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Photographs?

Authors:  Krista M Nicklaus; Xiomara T Gonzalez; Koushalya Sachdev; Jun Liu; Deepti Chopra; Aubri S Hoffman; Summer E Hanson; Mia K Markey; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 2.  Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites.

Authors:  Jack Wilkinson; Andy Vail; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluation of Information Sources in Plastic Surgery Decision-making.

Authors:  Nisha Parmeshwar; Chris M Reid; Andrew J Park; Michael G Brandel; Marek K Dobke; Amanda A Gosman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-06-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.