Literature DB >> 25189076

Functional feeding groups of aquatic insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature.

Alonso Ramírez, Pablo E Gutiérrez-Fonseca.   

Abstract

Aquatic macroinvertebrates are involved in numerous processes within aquatic ecosystems. They often have important effects on ecosystem processes such as primary production (via grazing), detritus breakdown, and nutrient mineralization and downstream spiraling. The functional feeding groups (FFG) classification was developed as a tool to facilitate the incorporation of macroinvertebrates in studies of aquatic ecosystems. This classification has the advantage of combining morphological characteristics (e.g., mouth part specialization) and behavioral mechanisms (e.g., way of feeding) used by macroinvertebrates when consuming resources. Although recent efforts have greatly advanced our ability to identify aquatic macroinvertebrates, there is limited information on FFG assignment. Furthermore, there has been some variation in the use of the FFG classification, in part due to an emphasis on using gut content analysis to assign FFG, which is more appropriate for assigning trophic guilds. Thus, the main goals of this study are to (1) provide an overview of the value of using the FFG classification, (2) make an initial attempt to summarize available information on FFG for aquatic insects in Latin America, and (3) provide general guidelines on how to assign organisms to their FFGs. FFGs are intended to reflect the potential effects of organisms in their ecosystems and the way they consume resources. Groups include scrapers that consume resources that grow attached to the substrate by removing them with their mouth parts; shredders that cut or chew pieces of living or dead plant material, including all plant parts like leaves and wood; collectors-gatherers that use modified mouth parts to sieve or collect small particles (< 1 mm) accumulated on the stream bottom; filterers that have special adaptations to remove particles directly from the water column; and predators that consume other organisms using different strategies to capture them. In addition, we provide details on piercers that feed on vascular plants by cutting or piercing the tissue using sharp or chewing mouth parts and consume plant liquids. We also provide a list of families of aquatic insects in Latin America, with an initial assignment to FFGs. We recommended caution when assigning FFGs based on gut contents, as it can provide misleading information. Overall, FFG is a very useful tool to understand the role of aquatic macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems and comparisons among studies will benefit from consistency in their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189076     DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v62i0.15785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Biol Trop        ISSN: 0034-7744            Impact factor:   0.723


  8 in total

1.  Aquatic macroinvertebrates in Uruguayan rice agroecosystem.

Authors:  Leticia Bao; Sebastián Martínez; Mónica Cadenazzi; Mónica Urrutia; Lucía Seijas; Enrique Castiglioni
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2021-03-04

2.  Invertebrates, Fungal Biomass, and Leaf Breakdown in Pools and Riffles of Neotropical Streams.

Authors:  Renato Tavares Martins; Lidimara Souza da Silveira; Marcos Pereira Lopes; Roberto Gama Alves
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World's Rivers: An Overview.

Authors:  Maria João Feio; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto; Susan J Nichols; Oghenekaro N Odume; Bernardo R Quintella; Mathias Kuemmerlen; Francisca C Aguiar; Salomé F P Almeida; Perla Alonso-EguíaLis; Francis O Arimoro; Fiona J Dyer; Jon S Harding; Sukhwan Jang; Philip R Kaufmann; Samhee Lee; Jianhua Li; Diego R Macedo; Ana Mendes; Norman Mercado-Silva; Wendy Monk; Keigo Nakamura; George G Ndiritu; Ralph Ogden; Michael Peat; Trefor B Reynoldson; Blanca Rios-Touma; Pedro Segurado; Adam G Yates
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Elevational biodiversity gradients in the Neotropics: Perspectives from freshwater caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera).

Authors:  Blanca Ríos-Touma; Francisco Cuesta; Ernesto Rázuri-Gonzales; Ralph Holzenthal; Andrea Tapia; Marco Calderón-Loor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Spatial Factors Outperform Local Environmental and Geo-Climatic Variables in Structuring Multiple Facets of Stream Macroinvertebrates' β-Diversity.

Authors:  Naicheng Wu; Guohao Liu; Min Zhang; Yixia Wang; Wenqi Peng; Xiaodong Qu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Land Use Influences Niche Size and the Assimilation of Resources by Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Tropical Headwater Streams.

Authors:  Diego Marcel Parreira de Castro; Débora Reis de Carvalho; Paulo dos Santos Pompeu; Marcelo Zacharias Moreira; Gabriela Bielefeld Nardoto; Marcos Callisto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stable isotope analyses of web-spinning spider assemblages along a headwater stream in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Sean P Kelly; Elvira Cuevas; Alonso Ramírez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Spatial and temporal variation of benthic macroinvertebrate communities along an urban river in Greater Manchester, UK.

Authors:  Cecilia Medupin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.513

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.