Literature DB >> 25188927

Comparison of obturator prosthesis fabricated using different techniques and its effect on the management of a hemipalatomaxillectomy patient.

Mokshada M Badadare1, Sanjayagouda B Patil1, Sudhakara Bhat1, Abhijit Tambe1.   

Abstract

Odontogenic tumours involving the maxilla or mandible are usually treated with surgical resection. To prevent recurrence, extensive surgical intervention might be carried out leaving the patient with anatomical defects. However, rehabilitation of such patients with an obturator can improve function, facial form and social acceptance. In this case, we have evaluated the different designs and techniques of fabrication of an obturator prosthesis used for the rehabilitation of a hemipalatomaxillectomy patient. A 40-year-old man presented with a loose fitting obturator prosthesis. He had undergone hemipalatomaxillectomy for the treatment of an ameloblastoma 2 years earlier and had been using an obturator prosthesis since then. Hollow-bulb obturator prostheses were fabricated using two different methods, the lost salt and open lid techniques. The obturator prosthesis fabricated with the lost salt technique weighed less than the patient's old obturator. But the obturator fabricated using the open lid technique did not only considerably reduce the weight of the prosthesis but also improved health, function, aesthetics, phonetics and quality of life in this hemipalatomaxillectomy patient. 2014 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188927      PMCID: PMC4154044          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  9 in total

1.  Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: Classification. 1978 [classical article].

Authors:  M A Aramany
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: Design principles. 1978 [classical article].

Authors:  M A Aramany
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients.

Authors:  F Keyf
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Obturator prostheses following palatal resection: clinical cases.

Authors:  G Tirelli; R Rizzo; M Biasotto; R Di Lenarda; B Argenti; A Gatto; F Bullo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Modified snap-on attachment with 'O-ring' for two piece hollow bulb obturator.

Authors:  C Gunasekar; K S Gamal Abdul Nasser; C Sabarigirinathan; K Ram Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patient requiring a partial maxillectomy.

Authors:  H Devlin; G R Barker
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Comparison of functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with and without palatomaxillary reconstruction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Devin Okay; Marita T Stepp; Rod P Rezaee; Jacqueline S Mojica; Daniel Buchbinder; Mark L Urken
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-07

8.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient after partial maxillectomy: A clinical report.

Authors:  Shobha J Rodrigues; Sharon Saldanha
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-10

9.  Articulation performance of patients wearing obturators with different buccal extension designs.

Authors:  Suha Turkaslan; Timucin Baykul; M Asim Aydin; M Mustafa Ozarslan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-07
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of swallowing and masticatory performance in obturator wearers: a clinical study.

Authors:  Nungotso Vero; Niraj Mishra; Balendra Pratap Singh; Kamleshwar Singh; Sunit Kumar Jurel; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.904

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.