Ronny Redlich1, Jorge J R Almeida2, Dominik Grotegerd1, Nils Opel1, Harald Kugel3, Walter Heindel3, Volker Arolt1, Mary L Phillips2, Udo Dannlowski4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany4Department of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The structural abnormalities in the brain that accurately differentiate unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar depression (BD) remain unidentified. OBJECTIVES: First, to investigate and compare morphometric changes in UD and BD, and to replicate the findings at 2 independent neuroimaging sites; second, to differentiate UD and BD using multivariate pattern classification techniques. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a 2-center cross-sectional study, structural gray matter data were obtained at 2 independent sites (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Münster, Germany) using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel-based morphometry was used to compare local gray and white matter volumes, and a novel pattern classification approach was used to discriminate between UD and BD, while training the classifier at one imaging site and testing in an independent sample at the other site. The Pittsburgh sample of participants was recruited from the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic at the University of Pittsburgh from 2008 to 2012. The Münster sample was recruited from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Münster from 2010 to 2012. Equally divided between the 2 sites were 58 currently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder, 58 age- and sex-matched unipolar depressed patients, and 58 matched healthy controls. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Magnetic resonance imaging was used to detect structural differences between groups. Morphometric analyses were applied using voxel-based morphometry. Pattern classification techniques were used for a multivariate approach. RESULTS: At both sites, individuals with BD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the hippocampal formation and the amygdala relative to individuals with UD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -22, y = -1, z = 20; k = 1938 voxels; t = 4.75), whereas individuals with UD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate gyrus compared with individuals with BD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -8, y = 32, z = 3; k = 979 voxels; t = 6.37; all corrected P < .05). Reductions in white matter volume within the cerebellum and hippocampus were found in individuals with BD. Pattern classification yielded up to 79.3% accuracy (P < .001) by differentiating the 2 depressed groups, training and testing the classifier at one site, and up to 69.0% accuracy (P < .001), training the classifier at one imaging site (Pittsburgh) and testing it at the other independent sample (Münster). Medication load did not alter the pattern of results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Individuals with UD and those with BD are differentiated by structural abnormalities in neural regions supporting emotion processing. Neuroimaging and multivariate pattern classification techniques are promising tools to differentiate UD from BD and show promise as future diagnostic aids.
IMPORTANCE: The structural abnormalities in the brain that accurately differentiate unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar depression (BD) remain unidentified. OBJECTIVES: First, to investigate and compare morphometric changes in UD and BD, and to replicate the findings at 2 independent neuroimaging sites; second, to differentiate UD and BD using multivariate pattern classification techniques. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a 2-center cross-sectional study, structural gray matter data were obtained at 2 independent sites (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Münster, Germany) using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel-based morphometry was used to compare local gray and white matter volumes, and a novel pattern classification approach was used to discriminate between UD and BD, while training the classifier at one imaging site and testing in an independent sample at the other site. The Pittsburgh sample of participants was recruited from the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic at the University of Pittsburgh from 2008 to 2012. The Münster sample was recruited from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Münster from 2010 to 2012. Equally divided between the 2 sites were 58 currently depressedpatients with bipolar I disorder, 58 age- and sex-matched unipolar depressedpatients, and 58 matched healthy controls. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Magnetic resonance imaging was used to detect structural differences between groups. Morphometric analyses were applied using voxel-based morphometry. Pattern classification techniques were used for a multivariate approach. RESULTS: At both sites, individuals with BD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the hippocampal formation and the amygdala relative to individuals with UD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -22, y = -1, z = 20; k = 1938 voxels; t = 4.75), whereas individuals with UD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate gyrus compared with individuals with BD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -8, y = 32, z = 3; k = 979 voxels; t = 6.37; all corrected P < .05). Reductions in white matter volume within the cerebellum and hippocampus were found in individuals with BD. Pattern classification yielded up to 79.3% accuracy (P < .001) by differentiating the 2 depressed groups, training and testing the classifier at one site, and up to 69.0% accuracy (P < .001), training the classifier at one imaging site (Pittsburgh) and testing it at the other independent sample (Münster). Medication load did not alter the pattern of results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Individuals with UD and those with BD are differentiated by structural abnormalities in neural regions supporting emotion processing. Neuroimaging and multivariate pattern classification techniques are promising tools to differentiate UD from BD and show promise as future diagnostic aids.
Authors: Ming-Ying Du; Qi-Zhu Wu; Qiang Yue; Jun Li; Yi Liao; Wei-Hong Kuang; Xiao-Qi Huang; Raymond C K Chan; Andrea Mechelli; Qi-Yong Gong Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Andre Marquand; Matthew Howard; Michael Brammer; Carlton Chu; Steven Coen; Janaina Mourão-Miranda Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Tim Hahn; Andre F Marquand; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Thomas Dresler; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Tomasz A Jarczok; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Peter M Jakob; Janaina Mourao-Miranda; Michael J Brammer; Andreas J Fallgatter Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-12-06
Authors: Yvette I Sheline; Deanna M Barch; Joseph L Price; Melissa M Rundle; S Neil Vaishnavi; Abraham Z Snyder; Mark A Mintun; Suzhi Wang; Rebecca S Coalson; Marcus E Raichle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jay C Fournier; Matthew T Keener; Jorge Almeida; Dina M Kronhaus; Mary L Phillips Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Lara C Foland-Ross; Matthew D Sacchet; Gautam Prasad; Brooke Gilbert; Paul M Thompson; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Int J Dev Neurosci Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 2.457
Authors: Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Eva M Meisenzahl; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Thomas Frodl; Joseph Kambeitz; Yanis Köhler; Peter Falkai; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Brain Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Tilo Kircher; Markus Wöhr; Igor Nenadic; Rainer Schwarting; Gerhard Schratt; Judith Alferink; Carsten Culmsee; Holger Garn; Tim Hahn; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Astrid Dempfle; Maik Hahmann; Andreas Jansen; Petra Pfefferle; Harald Renz; Marcella Rietschel; Stephanie H Witt; Markus Nöthen; Axel Krug; Udo Dannlowski Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 5.270