Literature DB >> 25188798

The effect of a silicone border foam dressing for prevention of pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis in intensive care unit patients.

Kyung Hee Park1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We measured the effect of a silicone border foam dressing on the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) and incontinence-associated dermatitis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparison cohort (quasi-experimental) study. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: One hundred and two patients (>40 years of age) with a Braden Scale score of 16 or less who were admitted to 2 ICUs at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, participated in the study. INSTRUMENTS: Pressure ulcer development was determined based on 2009 Guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Incontinence-associated dermatitis was measured using the Incontinence Associated Dermatitis and its Severity (IADS) instrument.
METHODS: Fifty-two subjects were assigned to the experimental group (standard PU preventive care routine plus application of the silicone border foam dressing), and 50 subjects were assigned to the control group (standard PU preventive care alone). The number of patients who developed PU in the experimental group was compared with that from the control group using the chi-square test (χ). The IADS score of the experimental group was measured and compared with those of the control group, using an independent t test. Logistic regression was carried out to analyze the relationship between the IADS score and PU development.
RESULTS: Both the incidence of PU development and IADS scores were significantly lower (χ = 21.722, P < .001, and t = 2.166, P < .033, respectively) in patients assigned to the experimental group as compared to those in the control group. The incidence of PU development significantly increased as the IADS score increased (odds ratio = 1.900, 95% CI = 1.237-2.917). A logistic regression analysis revealed that PU development was related to IADS score (P = .003) and that the risk of developing a pressure increased 1.9-fold for every 1-point increase in IADS score.
CONCLUSION: The application of a silicone border foam dressing decreased PU development and reduced the IADS score. Pressure ulcer development was found to be related to IADS score; the incidence of PU development significantly increased as IADS score increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188798     DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs        ISSN: 1071-5754            Impact factor:   1.741


  9 in total

1.  Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun J Lee; Jung Y Kim; Woo Y Shin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Effectiveness of a multi-layer foam dressing in preventing sacral pressure ulcers for the early acute care of patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury: comparison with the use of a gel mattress.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Combination of urease inhibitor and antiseptic inhibits urea decomposition-induced ammonia production by Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  Yuko Mugita; Gojiro Nakagami; Takeo Minematsu; Aya Kitamura; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Zena Eh Moore; Joan Webster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-06

5.  Clinical Evaluation of a Skin Protectant for the Management of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: An Open-Label, Nonrandomized, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mary R Brennan; Catherine T Milne; Marie Agrell-Kann; Bruce P Ekholm
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 6.  Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Dimitri Beeckman; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 7.  Mepilex Border Sacrum and Heel Dressings for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  C Marshall; J Shore; M Arber; M Cikalo; T Oladapo; A Peel; R McCool; Michelle Jenks
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Cost-effectiveness of multi-layered silicone foam dressings for prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in high-risk intensive care unit patients: An economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Monira El Genedy; Elisabeth Hahnel; Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva; William V Padula; Armin Hauß; Nils Löber; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Predicting the cut-off point for interface pressure in pressure injury according to the standard hospital mattress and polyurethane foam mattress as support surfaces.

Authors:  Mi Yu; Kyung Hee Park; Jiseon Shin; Ji Hyun Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.099

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.