Literature DB >> 25188649

Laser patterning of platinum electrodes for safe neurostimulation.

R A Green1, P B Matteucci, C W D Dodds, J Palmer, W F Dueck, R T Hassarati, P J Byrnes-Preston, N H Lovell, G J Suaning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laser surface modification of platinum (Pt) electrodes was investigated for use in neuroprosthetics. Surface modification was applied to increase the surface area of the electrode and improve its ability to transfer charge within safe electrochemical stimulation limits. APPROACH: Electrode arrays were laser micromachined to produce Pt electrodes with smooth surfaces, which were then modified with four laser patterning techniques to produce surface structures which were nanosecond patterned, square profile, triangular profile and roughened on the micron scale through structured laser interference patterning (SLIP). Improvements in charge transfer were shown through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and biphasic stimulation at clinically relevant levels. A new method was investigated and validated which enabled the assessment of in vivo electrochemically safe charge injection limits. MAIN
RESULTS: All of the modified surfaces provided electrical advantage over the smooth Pt. The SLIP surface provided the greatest benefit both in vitro and in vivo, and this surface was the only type which had injection limits above the threshold for neural stimulation, at a level shown to produce a response in the feline visual cortex when using an electrode array implanted in the suprachoroidal space of the eye. This surface was found to be stable when stimulated with more than 150 million clinically relevant pulses in physiological saline. SIGNIFICANCE: Critical to the assessment of implant devices is accurate determination of safe usage limits in an in vivo environment. Laser patterning, in particular SLIP, is a superior technique for improving the performance of implant electrodes without altering the interfacial electrode chemistry through coating. Future work will require chronic in vivo assessment of these electrode patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188649     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  10 in total

1.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Conducting Polymers for Neural Prosthetic and Neural Interface Applications.

Authors:  Rylie Green; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Public Regulatory Databases as a Source of Insight for Neuromodulation Devices Stimulation Parameters.

Authors:  Doe Kumsa; G Karl Steinke; Gregory F Molnar; Eric M Hudak; Fred W Montague; Shawn C Kelley; Darrel F Untereker; Alan Shi; Benjamin P Hahn; Chris Condit; Hyowon Lee; Dawn Bardot; Jose A Centeno; Victor Krauthamer; Pavel A Takmakov
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  An evaluation framework for research platforms to advance cochlear implant/hearing aid technology: A case study with CCi-MOBILE.

Authors:  Ram C M C Shekar; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Concept and Development of an Electronic Framework Intended for Electrode and Surrounding Environment Characterization In Vivo.

Authors:  Stefan B Rieger; Jennifer Pfau; Thomas Stieglitz; Maria Asplund; Juan S Ordonez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Visual Prosthesis: Interfacing Stimulating Electrodes with Retinal Neurons to Restore Vision.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Lilach Bareket; Josef Goding; Ulises A Aregueta-Robles; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  High-amplitude electrical stimulation can reduce elicited neuronal activity in visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Tianruo Guo; Chih-Yu Yang; Amr Al Abed; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Femtosecond laser hierarchical surface restructuring for next generation neural interfacing electrodes and microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Shahram Amini; Wesley Seche; Nicholas May; Hongbin Choi; Pouya Tavousi; Sina Shahbazmohamadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes.

Authors:  Nicholas V Apollo; Brendan Murphy; Kayla Prezelski; Nicolette Driscoll; Andrew G Richardson; Timothy H Lucas; Flavia Vitale
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Conductive Hydrogel Electrodes for Delivery of Long-Term High Frequency Pulses.

Authors:  Naomi A Staples; Josef A Goding; Aaron D Gilmour; Kirill Y Aristovich; Phillip Byrnes-Preston; David S Holder; John W Morley; Nigel H Lovell; Daniel J Chew; Rylie A Green
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.