Literature DB >> 25188601

Optimal radiographical criteria after selective thoracic fusion for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a C lumbar modifier: does adherence to current guidelines predict success?

Jacob Schulz1, Jahangir Asghar, Tracey Bastrom, Harry Shufflebarger, Peter O Newton, Peter Sturm, Randal R Betz, Amer F Samdani, Burt Yaszay.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective data.
OBJECTIVE: To define optimal postoperative coronal parameters after selective thoracic fusions (STFs) and to test these parameters against recommended criteria for when to perform an STF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have provided recommendations for when STF should be performed; however, clear parameters for target outcomes are lacking.
METHODS: Patients with Lenke 1C to 4C curves with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from a multicenter database who underwent STF with minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. Postoperative parameters included lumbar Cobb angle, trunk shift, coronal balance, percent lumbar correction, and deformity-flexibility quotient. First, the upper 95% confidence interval for each parameter was calculated (queried data threshold) and set as the limit of "optimal" outcomes. Second, an independent surgeon survey was performed, and in patients with unanimous surgeon agreement of "success," the upper 95% confidence interval was determined (surgeon-derived threshold). Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were compared between those above and below these 2 thresholds. Then, these outcomes were used to determine whether adherence to, or disregard for, previously published guidelines for STF were predictive of final outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were analyzed. Target postoperative parameters as determined by the queried data and surgeon-derived thresholds were similar and rounded to: deformity-flexibility quotient less than 4, lumbar Cobb angle less than 26°, lumbar correction more than 37%, coronal balance 2 cm or less, and trunk shift less than 1.5 cm. Patients within target parameters had significantly better Scoliosis Research Society-22 satisfaction scores. Neither preoperative apical vertebral translation ratio more than 1.2 nor Cobb angle ratio more than 1.2 predicted 2-year success. Preoperative lumbar curve less than 45° and lumbar bend less than 25° were associated with increased likelihood of optimal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Optimal postoperative outcomes for STF should include a lumbar Cobb angle less than 26°, coronal balance 2 cm or less, deformity-flexibility quotient less than 4, lumbar correction more than 37%, and trunk shift less than 1.5 cm. These findings suggest that performing an STF in patients with a preoperative lumbar Cobb angle less than 45° or a preoperative lumbar bend less than 25° will increase one's chances of success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188601     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Defining criteria for optimal lumbar curve correction following the selective thoracic fusion surgery in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: developing a decision tree.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-23

2.  L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an "ideal" result in Lenke 5 curves.

Authors:  Lee Phillips; Burt Yaszay; Tracey P Bastrom; Suken A Shah; Baron S Lonner; Firoz Miyanji; Amer F Samdani; Stefan Parent; Jahangir Asghar; Patrick J Cahill; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Selective thoracic fusion of a left decompensated main thoracic curve: proceed with caution?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Tracey P Bastrom; Carrie E Bartley; Suken A Shah; Baron S Lonner; Jahangir Asghar; Firoz Miyanji; Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors affecting pelvic rotation in idiopathic scoliosis: Analysis of 85 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Yunfei Zhao; Lin Qi; Jun Yang; Xiaodong Zhu; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Selective Thoracic Fusion for King-Moe Type II/Lenke 1C Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Major Concerns.

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Makoto Nishiyama; Michihiro Kamata
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Three-dimensional classification of the Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using coronal and lateral spinal radiographs.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Victor Ho-Fung; Malcolm Eker; Sarah Nossov; Michael Francavilla
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Importance of Lumbar Curve Flexibility and Apical Vertebral Rotation for the Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 C Curves: Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of More than 10 years.

Authors:  Ozcan Kaya; Deniz Kara; Halil Gok; Sinan Kahraman; Tunay Sanlı; Selhan Karadereler; Meric Enercan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04-29

8.  Onset and remodeling of coronal imbalance after selective posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (a pilot study).

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Kai Cao; Long Pang; Nobuyuki Fujita; Mitsuru Yagi; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Masafumi Machida; Shinichi Ishihara; Makoto Nishiyama; Yasuyuki Fukui; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-05-12

9.  Data-driven Classification of the 3D Spinal Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with an Applications in Surgical Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; John Flynn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.