Jolanda Derks1, Jacob C Reijneveld, Linda Douw. 1. aDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences bDepartment of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands cDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain tumor patients suffer from cognitive deficits, regardless of tumor grade or location. Deficits have a general character, falling in the domains of attention, working memory, information processing speed, and executive functioning. This review explores a new, brain network-based view of these deficits in brain tumor patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Network theory has evolved within the fields of mathematics and sociology and has resulted in its application to many complex systems, such as social networks, traffic flow networks, and biological protein networks. In the brain, a network can be constructed by assessing either functional or anatomical connections between brain areas, and subsequently extracting their overarching network patterns. Important brain network features are local specialization, operationalized by local clustering, and global integration or path length. Widespread disturbances in network topology are found in brain tumor patients, which relate to their cognitive problems. Furthermore, changes in network topology in response to oncological interventions, particularly tumor resection, go hand in hand with cognitive outcome. SUMMARY: Cognitive deficits in brain tumor patients are reflected in whole-brain network disturbances. Possible future clinical use of these findings mostly concerns prognostics and tailoring treatment strategies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain tumorpatients suffer from cognitive deficits, regardless of tumor grade or location. Deficits have a general character, falling in the domains of attention, working memory, information processing speed, and executive functioning. This review explores a new, brain network-based view of these deficits in brain tumorpatients. RECENT FINDINGS: Network theory has evolved within the fields of mathematics and sociology and has resulted in its application to many complex systems, such as social networks, traffic flow networks, and biological protein networks. In the brain, a network can be constructed by assessing either functional or anatomical connections between brain areas, and subsequently extracting their overarching network patterns. Important brain network features are local specialization, operationalized by local clustering, and global integration or path length. Widespread disturbances in network topology are found in brain tumorpatients, which relate to their cognitive problems. Furthermore, changes in network topology in response to oncological interventions, particularly tumor resection, go hand in hand with cognitive outcome. SUMMARY:Cognitive deficits in brain tumorpatients are reflected in whole-brain network disturbances. Possible future clinical use of these findings mostly concerns prognostics and tailoring treatment strategies.
Authors: Zsuzsika Sjoerds; Steven M Stufflebeam; Dick J Veltman; Wim Van den Brink; Brenda W J H Penninx; Linda Douw Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Vyshak Chandra; Xiao Da; Yangming Ou; Kyrre E Emblem; Alona Muzikansky; Xuezhu Cai; Linda Douw; John G Evans; Jorg Dietrich; Andrew S Chi; Patrick Y Wen; Stephen Stufflebeam; Bruce Rosen; Dan G Duda; Rakesh K Jain; Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Quirien Oort; Linda Dirven; Sietske A M Sikkes; Neil Aaronson; Florien Boele; Christine Brannan; Jonas Egeter; Robin Grant; Martin Klein; Irene M Lips; Yoshitaka Narita; Hitomi Sato; Monika Sztankay; Günther Stockhammer; Andrea Talacchi; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Jaap C Reijneveld; Martin J B Taphoorn Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2022-02-26
Authors: Kyle R Noll; Henry S Chen; Jeffrey S Wefel; Vinodh A Kumar; Ping Hou; Sherise D Ferguson; Ganesh Rao; Jason M Johnson; Donald F Schomer; Dima Suki; Sujit S Prabhu; Ho-Ling Liu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Jolanda Derks; Anne R Dirkson; Philip C de Witt Hamer; Quinten van Geest; Hanneke E Hulst; Frederik Barkhof; Petra J W Pouwels; Jeroen J G Geurts; Jaap C Reijneveld; Linda Douw Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Ellen W S Carbo; Arjan Hillebrand; Edwin van Dellen; Prejaas Tewarie; Philip C de Witt Hamer; Johannes C Baayen; Martin Klein; Jeroen J G Geurts; Jaap C Reijneveld; Cornelis J Stam; Linda Douw Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hannelore Aerts; Michael Schirner; Ben Jeurissen; Dirk Van Roost; Eric Achten; Petra Ritter; Daniele Marinazzo Journal: eNeuro Date: 2018-06-04