| Literature DB >> 25187840 |
Yan-Yan Long1, Yu Wang2, Qian-Rong Huang2, Guang-Shun Zheng2, Shun-Chang Jiao3.
Abstract
NY-ESO-1 has been identified as one of the most immunogenic antigens; thus, is a highly attractive target for cancer immunotherapy. The present study analyzed the expression of serum antibodies (Abs) against NY-ESO-1 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), with the aim of guiding the treatment of NY-ESO-1-based specific-immunotherapy for these patients. Furthermore, the present study was the first to evaluate the kinetic expression of anti-NY-ESO-1 Abs and investigate the possible influencing factors. A total of 239 serum samples from 155 pathologically confirmed patients with advanced CRC (stages III and IV) were collected. The presence of spontaneous Abs against NY-ESO-1 was analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results demonstrated that 24.5% (38/155) of the investigated patients were positive for NY-ESO-1-specific Abs. No statistically significant correlations were identified between the expression of anti-NY-ESO-1 Abs and clinicopathological parameters, including age and gender, location, grading, local infiltration, lymph node status, metastatic status and K-ras mutation status (P>0.05). In 59 patients, the kinetic expression of anti-NY-ESO-1 Abs was analyzed, of which 14 patients were initially positive and 45 patients were initially negative. Notably, 16/59 (27.1%) patients changed their expression status during the study period, and the initially positive patients were more likely to change compared with the initially negative patients (85.7 vs. 8.8%; P<0.001). Therefore, monitoring serum Abs against NY-ESO-1 by ELISA is an easy and feasible method. The high expression rate of NY-ESO-1-specific Abs in CRC patients indicates that measuring the levels of serum Abs against NY-ESO-1 may guide the treatment of NY-ESO-1-based specific immunotherapy for patients with advanced CRC.Entities:
Keywords: NY-ESO-1; antigen-specific immunotherapy; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; humoral immunity; serum antibody
Year: 2014 PMID: 25187840 PMCID: PMC4151660 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1913
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Baseline clinical characteristics of the patients with colorectal cancer (n=155).
| Characteristic | Patients, n (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 93 (60.0) |
| Female | 62 (40.0) |
| Pathology | |
| Unknown | 3 (1.9) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 123 (79.4) |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma and/or signet ring cell carcinoma | 7 (4.5) |
| Adenocarcinoma with mucinous adenocarcinoma and/or signet ring cell carcinoma component | 20 (12.9) |
| Neuroendocrine carcinoma | 2 (1.3) |
| Location | |
| Colon | 83 (53.5) |
| Rectum | 72 (46.5) |
| Surgical history | |
| None | 28 (18.0) |
| Palliative | 26 (16.8) |
| Radical | 101 (65.2) |
| Stage | |
| Unknown | 2 (1.3) |
| III | 32 (20.6) |
| IV | 121 (78.1) |
| Sites of metastases (stage IV) | |
| Lung | 56 (36.1) |
| Liver | 79 (50.9) |
| Bone | 18 (11.6) |
| Lymph nodes | 34 (21.9) |
| Others (adrenal gland/ovarium/peritoneal) | 43 (27.7) |
Median age, 55 years; age range, 18–83 years.
Figure 1Representative ELISA results from 19 patients with colorectal cancer, with serum sample dilutions of (A) 1:25, (B) 1:125 and (C) 1:625. The dotted line represents the cutoff value (cut off value = mean OD values of the N control + 3 × standard deviation). Among the 19 patients, only one patient exhibited a ‘strong positive reaction’, where the OD values exceeded the cutoff value in the three diluted serum titers (1:25, 1:125 and 1:625). Two patients exhibited a ‘weak positive reaction’, where the OD values exceeded the cutoff values in two of the diluted titers. N control, negative control (n=10); P control, positive control (n=1; non-small cell lung cancer patient); OD, optical density.
Association between the expression of NY-ESO-1 serum antibodies and clinicopathological parameters.
| Parameter | Patients, n | Weak positive, n (%) | Strong positive, n (%) | Positive, n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (n=155) | |||||
| Male | 93 | 15 (16.1) | 10 (10.8) | 25 (26.9) | 0.640 |
| Female | 62 | 9 (14.5) | 4 (6.5) | 13 (21.0) | |
| Location (n=155) | |||||
| Colon | 83 | 11 (13.3) | 7 (8.4) | 18 (21.7) | 0.659 |
| Rectum | 72 | 13 (18.1) | 7 (9.7) | 20 (27.8) | |
| Surgical history (n=155) | |||||
| None | 28 | 4 (14.3) | 1 (3.6) | 5 (17.9) | 0.254 |
| Palliative | 26 | 5 (19.2) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (19.2) | |
| Radical | 101 | 15 (14.9) | 13 (12.9) | 28 (27.7) | |
| Grading | |||||
| G1/G1–2 | 11 | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (18.2) | 0.755 |
| G2 | 79 | 10 (12.7) | 9 (11.4) | 19 (24.1) | |
| G3/G2–3 | 44 | 8 (18.2) | 3 (6.8) | 11 (25.0) | |
| Vessel emboli/nerve invasion (n=112) | |||||
| Yes | 35 | 8 (22.9) | 2 (5.7) | 10 (28.6) | 0.278 |
| No | 77 | 9 (11.7) | 9 (11.7) | 18 (23.4) | |
| Local infiltration (n=113) | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.052 |
| 2 | 9 | 3 (33.3) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (66.6) | |
| 3 | 10 | 2 (20.0) | 1 (10.0) | 3 (30.0) | |
| 4 | 93 | 13 (14.0) | 7 (7.5) | 20 (21.5) | |
| Lymph node status | |||||
| 0 | 21 | 4 (19.0) | 2 (9.5) | 6 (28.6) | 0.786 |
| 1 | 53 | 6 (11.3) | 4 (7.5) | 10 (18.9) | |
| 2 | 35 | 6 (17.1) | 4 (11.4) | 10 (28.6) | |
| Metastatic status | |||||
| 0 | 32 | 3 (9.4) | 3 (9.4) | 6 (18.7) | 0.585 |
| 1 | 44 | 8 (18.2) | 6 (13.6) | 14 (31.8) | |
| 2 | 41 | 9 (22.0) | 3 (7.3) | 12 (29.3) | |
| ≥3 | 36 | 4 (11.1) | 2 (5.6) | 6 (16.7) | |
| Stage (n=153) | |||||
| III | 32 | 3 (9.4) | 2 (6.3) | 5 (15.6) | 0.493 |
| IV | 121 | 21 (17.4) | 12 (9.9) | 33 (27.3) | |
| K-ras status (n=37) | |||||
| Wild type | 20 | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 2 (10) | 0.159 |
| Mutant type | 17 | 4 (23.5) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (23.5) |
Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test.
Grading was characterized according to criteria from the World Health Organization (G1, G2 and G3 for well, moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively).
Lymph node status was classified by the seventh edition of the CRC TNM classification.
Metastatic status was determined by the number of metastatic sites.
CRC, colorectal cancer.
Conversion of NY-ESO-1 serum antibodies in patients with a different clinical status (n=16).
| Condition of sera conversion | Cases, n |
|---|---|
| Positive→Negative | 6 |
| Negative→Positive | 2 |
| Positive→Negative and Negative→Positive | 2 |
| Strong/Weak positive→Weak/Strong Positive | 6 |
Figure 2Correlation between the initial expression of NY-ESO-1 serum antibodies and sera conversion in 59 patients whose serum samples were kinetically monitored.