Literature DB >> 25187763

Genetic determinations of variable responsiveness to clopidogrel and implications for neurointerventional procedures.

Ruth Colley1, Bernard Yan2.   

Abstract

Endovascular intervention is emerging as a substitute for open surgical procedures for the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. However, up to 9% of patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures develop thromboembolic complications. Strategies to reduce periprocedural thromboembolic events are dominated by the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) which has been validated based on studies of peripheral vascular and coronary intervention. Of note, DAT decreases adverse vascular outcomes by 75-80% in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It follows that similar treatment effects would be observed in neurointerventional populations. However, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that a subgroup of patients respond suboptimally to DAT, and in particular to clopidogrel (termed clopidogrel hyporesponders). These patients may be at an increased risk of thromboembolic complications such as in-stent thrombosis following neurointerventional procedures. Previous studies report 5-30% suboptimal response to clopidogrel in the cardiovascular population, while a higher prevalence is seen in populations undergoing neurointerventional procedures, i.e. as much as 66%. Knowledge of the mechanism leading to clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness is accumulating. A number of genetic polymorphisms, in particular CYP 2C19*2, have been associated with clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness and clinical outcomes. In addition, there are significant differences in the prevalence of CYP 2C19*2 across racial groups. Approximately 50% of Asians and 25% of Caucasians harbor the CYP 2C19*2 allele. While no prospective randomized trials currently exist to demonstrate improved clinical outcomes with genotype-based treatment for carriers of the CYP 2C19*2 polymorphism, a number of studies show that an increased dose of clopidogrel improves platelet inhibition in hyporesponders. The aim of the review is to examine the current understanding of the genetic basis of clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures and to explore current efforts using genotype and phenotype testing as well as alternative strategies to overcome the clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP2C19 polymorphism; Clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness; Neurointervention; Stent thrombosis

Year:  2012        PMID: 25187763      PMCID: PMC4031765          DOI: 10.1159/000338359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neurol        ISSN: 1664-5545


  30 in total

1.  Genetic variability in response to clopidogrel therapy: clinical implications.

Authors:  Kurt Huber
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Early but not late stent thrombosis is influenced by residual platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary interventions.

Authors:  Tobias Geisler; Christine Zürn; Rostislav Simonenko; Mathilde Rapin; Hassan Kraibooj; Antonios Kilias; Boris Bigalke; Konstantinos Stellos; Matthias Schwab; Andreas E May; Christian Herdeg; Meinrad Gawaz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Differential impacts of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticlopidine.

Authors:  A Maeda; H Ando; T Asai; H Ishiguro; N Umemoto; M Ohta; M Morishima; A Sumida; T Kobayashi; K Hosohata; K Ushijima; A Fujimura
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Anti-platelet drug resistance in the prediction of thromboembolic complications after neurointervention.

Authors:  Dal-Sung Ryu; Chang-Ki Hong; Yoo-Sik Sim; Chang-Hyun Kim; Jin-Young Jung; Jin-Yang Joo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

5.  Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study.

Authors:  Paul A Gurbel; Kevin P Bliden; Kathleen Butler; Mark J Antonino; Cheryl Wei; Renli Teng; Lars Rasmussen; Robert F Storey; Tonny Nielsen; John W Eikelboom; Georges Sabe-Affaki; Steen Husted; Dean J Kereiakes; David Henderson; Dharmendra V Patel; Udaya S Tantry
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity. An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Sofi; Rossella Marcucci; Anna Maria Gori; Betti Giusti; Rosanna Abbate; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators.

Authors:  M B Leon; D S Baim; J J Popma; P C Gordon; D E Cutlip; K K Ho; A Giambartolomei; D J Diver; D M Lasorda; D O Williams; S J Pocock; R E Kuntz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy.

Authors:  Alan R Shuldiner; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Kevin P Bliden; Amish Gandhi; Kathleen Ryan; Richard B Horenstein; Coleen M Damcott; Ruth Pakyz; Udaya S Tantry; Quince Gibson; Toni I Pollin; Wendy Post; Afshin Parsa; Braxton D Mitchell; Nauder Faraday; William Herzog; Paul A Gurbel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Dual antiplatelet therapy monitoring for neurointerventional procedures using a point-of-care platelet function test: a single-center experience.

Authors:  D H Lee; A Arat; H Morsi; H Shaltoni; J R Harris; M E Mawad
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The antiplatelet effect of higher loading and maintenance dose regimens of clopidogrel: the PRINC (Plavix Response in Coronary Intervention) trial.

Authors:  Patrick Gladding; Mark Webster; Irene Zeng; Helen Farrell; Jim Stewart; Peter Ruygrok; John Ormiston; Seif El-Jack; Guy Armstrong; Patrick Kay; Douglas Scott; Arzu Gunes; Marja-Liisa Dahl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.195

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The development of carotid stent material.

Authors:  Dongsheng He; Wenhua Liu; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Potential Usefulness of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cerebral Endovascular Procedures and Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Jorge Duconge; Dagmar F Hernandez-Suarez
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017

Review 3.  Bailout Strategies and Complications Associated with the Use of Flow-Diverting Stents for Treating Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Fawaz Al-Mufti; Eric R Cohen; Krishna Amuluru; Vikas Patel; Mohammad El-Ghanem; Rolla Nuoman; Neil Majmundar; Neha S Dangayach; Philip M Meyers
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Safety of Low Dose Intravenous Cangrelor in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Case Series.

Authors:  Hisham Salahuddin; Giana Dawod; Syed F Zaidi; Julie Shawver; Richard Burgess; Mouhammad A Jumaa
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  P2Y12 inhibitors for the neurointerventionalist.

Authors:  Robin J Borchert; Davide Simonato; Charlotte R Hickman; Maurizio Fuschi; Lucie Thibault; Hans Henkes; David Fiorella; Benjamin Yq Tan; Leonard Ll Yeo; Hegoda L D Makalanda; Ken Wong; Pervinder Bhogal
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 1.610

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.