Literature DB >> 25187585

Consequences of oversizing: nerve-to-nerve tube diameter mismatch.

Jonathan Isaacs1, Satya Mallu1, Wo Yan2, Barrett Little1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although commercially available nerve conduits are an accepted tool for overcoming short gaps in peripheral nerve repair, unexplained inconsistencies in clinical outcomes are not uncommon. Although exceeding the critical gap size and nerve caliber are most frequently cited as the source of these failures, oversizing of the nerve conduit in relation to the nerve diameter may be a previously unrecognized factor as well.
METHODS: Sixty female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent excision of a 10-mm section midway between the sciatic notch and the sciatic nerve division of one hindlimb. The defect was immediately repaired by reversing the resected nerve section and suturing it back in place (reverse autograft) (group A, n = 13) or it was repaired with a 14-mm nerve tube of 3 mm in diameter (group B, n = 12), 2 mm in diameter (group C, n = 15), or 1.5 mm in diameter (group D, n = 15). At twelve weeks, the rodents underwent muscle strength testing before harvest of muscle and nerve (including the conduit) for histomorphologic assessment.
RESULTS: Most conduits from group B were collapsed at final inspection and demonstrated diminished nerve regenerate. Muscle atrophy was most pronounced in groups B and C (p < 0.05), although normalized muscle contraction force was weakest in group B (p < 0.05), indicating inferior reinnervation. The axon counts, axon diameter, and G-ratios at the midpart of the conduit or graft demonstrated more axons and lower G-ratios in the autologous graft group. Among the conduit groups, the axon counts were lowest in group B (p < 0.05) followed by group C (p < 0.05). The G-ratio was highest in group B (p < 0.05), although the axon diameter was highest in group B (p < 0.05) as well.
CONCLUSIONS: Repair of a 10-mm gap in a rodent nerve with an oversized, poorly fitted nerve conduit resulted in tube collapse, poor nerve regenerate, and decreased muscle reinnervation compared with the findings in the animals treated with more accurately fitted nerve conduits. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate sizing of nerve conduits to the nerve-stump diameter improves nerve recovery.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25187585     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Bridging the Gap: Engineered Porcine-derived Urinary Bladder Matrix Conduits as a Novel Scaffold for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Lyly Nguyen; Ashkan Afshari; Nathaniel D Kelm; Alonda C Pollins; R Bruce Shack; Mark D Does; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 2.  Biomechanical microenvironment in peripheral nerve regeneration: from pathophysiological understanding to tissue engineering development.

Authors:  Lingchi Kong; Xin Gao; Yun Qian; Wei Sun; Zhengwei You; Cunyi Fan
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.600

3.  Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Ricardo Ortiz; Ritsaart F Westenberg; Christopher G Langhammer; William J Knaus; Neal C Chen; Kyle R Eberlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-13

4.  Neuroskeletal Effects of Chronic Bioelectric Nerve Stimulation in Health and Diabetes.

Authors:  Alec T Beeve; Ivana Shen; Xiao Zhang; Kristann Magee; Ying Yan; Matthew R MacEwan; Erica L Scheller
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Self-curling electroconductive nerve dressing for enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration in diabetic rats.

Authors:  Can Liu; Lei Fan; Zhenming Tian; Huiquan Wen; Lei Zhou; Pengfei Guan; Yian Luo; Chuncheung Chan; Guoxin Tan; Chengyun Ning; Limin Rong; Bin Liu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 6.  Optimal Morphometric Characteristics of a Tubular Polymeric Scaffold to Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Josefa Alarcón Apablaza; María Florencia Lezcano; Karina Godoy Sánchez; Gonzalo H Oporto; Fernando José Dias
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 7.  Natural-Based Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair.

Authors:  Benedetta E Fornasari; Giacomo Carta; Giovanna Gambarotta; Stefania Raimondo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.