Literature DB >> 25187534

Performance indicators for lung cancer surgery in the Netherlands.

Ronald A Damhuis1, Alex P Maat2, Peter W Plaisier3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the Netherlands, surgery for lung cancer is traditionally performed in low-volume hospitals. To assess the need for centralization, we examined early outcome measures and compared results between hospitals and with other European countries.
METHODS: Data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Results were tabulated for 30-day postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity rate (intrathoracic empyema, bronchopleural fistula or rethoracotomy) and pneumonectomy proportion. Hospital variation was projected using funnel graphs in which the results for individual hospitals are plotted against volume.
RESULTS: The study comprised a series of 9579 patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer, diagnosed from 2005 through 2010 and operated in 79 different hospitals. The POM was 2.7% on average and age, gender, period and type of surgery were determined as prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis did not reveal an association with hospital volume (P = 0.34). The POM was higher for operations on Fridays (4.0%) or during weekends (6.8%). Major morbidity was observed after 8.3% of operations and was more frequent after bilobectomy (11.6%) or right pneumonectomy (22%). The pneumonectomy proportion decreased from 18% in 2005 to 11% in 2010. Funnel plots revealed a limited number of significant outliers, despite combining data over a 6-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: Results for the Netherlands were similar to those from other European countries. Hospital volume was not associated with early outcome indicators. Quality assessment at the hospital level remains a major challenge given the low frequency of adverse events and the impediments of chance variation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital volume; Lung cancer; Pneumonectomy; Postoperative mortality; Quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25187534     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  Between-hospital variations in 3-year survival among patients with newly diagnosed gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer.

Authors:  Toshitaka Morishima; Sumiyo Okawa; Shihoko Koyama; Kayo Nakata; Takahiro Tabuchi; Isao Miyashiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Achieving Thoracic Oncology data collection in Europe: a precursor study in 35 Countries.

Authors:  Anna Rich; David Baldwin; Inmaculada Alfageme; Paul Beckett; Thierry Berghmans; Stephen Brincat; Otto Burghuber; Alexandru Corlateanu; Tanja Cufer; Ronald Damhuis; Edvardas Danila; Joanna Domagala-Kulawik; Stefano Elia; Mina Gaga; Tuncay Goksel; Bogdan Grigoriu; Gunnar Hillerdal; Rudolf Maria Huber; Erik Jakobsen; Steinn Jonsson; Dragana Jovanovic; Elena Kavcova; Assia Konsoulova; Tanel Laisaar; Riitta Makitaro; Bakir Mehic; Robert Milroy; Judit Moldvay; Ross Morgan; Milda Nanushi; Marianne Paesmans; Paul Martin Putora; Miroslav Samarzija; Arnaud Scherpereel; Marc Schlesser; Jean-Paul Sculier; Jana Skrickova; Renato Sotto-Mayor; Trond-Eirik Strand; Paul Van Schil; Torsten-Gerriet Blum
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Delayed surgery after histologic or radiologic-diagnosed clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chien-Sheng Huang; Po-Kuei Hsu; Chun-Ku Chen; Yi-Chen Yeh; Chun-Che Shih; Biing-Shiun Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.