Literature DB >> 25186807

Field Worker Evaluation of Dengue Vector Surveillance Methods: Factors That Determine Perceived Ease, Difficulty, Value, and Time Effectiveness in Australia and Malaysia.

Aishah H Azil1, Scott A Ritchie2, Craig R Williams3.   

Abstract

This qualitative study aimed to describe field worker perceptions, evaluations of worth, and time costs of routine dengue vector surveillance methods in Cairns (Australia), Kuala Lumpur and Petaling District (Malaysia). In Cairns, the BG-Sentinel trap is a favored method for field workers because of its user-friendliness, but is not as cost-efficient as the sticky ovitrap. In Kuala Lumpur, the Mosquito Larvae Trapping Device is perceived as a solution for the inaccessibility of premises to larval surveys. Nonetheless, the larval survey method is retained in Malaysia for prompt detection of dengue vectors. For dengue vector surveillance to be successful, there needs to be not only technical, quantitative evaluations of method performance but also an appreciation of how amenable field workers are to using particular methods. Here, we report novel field worker perceptions of dengue vector surveillance methods in addition to time analysis for each method.
© 2014 APJPH.

Keywords:  Aedes; BG-Sentinel trap; Mosquito Larvae Trapping Device; autocidal ovitraps; dengue vector surveillance; larval survey; sticky ovitrap

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186807     DOI: 10.1177/1010539514548760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health        ISSN: 1010-5395            Impact factor:   1.399


  6 in total

1.  Operational Aspects of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap.

Authors:  Verónica Acevedo; Manuel Amador; Gilberto Félix; Roberto Barrera
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.917

2.  Mosquito and Virus Surveillance as a Predictor of Human Ross River Virus Infection in South-West Western Australia: How Useful Is It?

Authors:  Liz J Walker; Linda A Selvey; Andrew Jardine; Cheryl A Johansen; Michael D A Lindsay
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Designing Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquito Traps: The Evolution of the Male Aedes Sound Trap by Iterative Evaluation.

Authors:  Kyran M Staunton; Jianyi Liu; Michael Townsend; Mark Desnoyer; Paul Howell; Jacob E Crawford; Wei Xiang; Nigel Snoad; Thomas R Burkot; Scott A Ritchie
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 4.  Effective surveillance systems for vector-borne diseases in urban settings and translation of the data into action: a scoping review.

Authors:  Florence Fournet; Frédéric Jourdain; Emmanuel Bonnet; Stéphanie Degroote; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.520

5.  Outcomes from international field trials with Male Aedes Sound Traps: Frequency-dependent effectiveness in capturing target species in relation to bycatch abundance.

Authors:  Kyran M Staunton; Donovan Leiva; Alvaro Cruz; Joelyn Goi; Carlos Arisqueta; Jianyi Liu; Mark Desnoyer; Paul Howell; Francia Espinosa; Azael Che Mendoza; Stephan Karl; Jacob E Crawford; Wei Xiang; Pablo Manrique-Saide; Nicole L Achee; John P Grieco; Scott A Ritchie; Thomas R Burkot; Nigel Snoad
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  Effect of BG-Lures on the Male Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) Sound Trap Capture Rates.

Authors:  Kyran M Staunton; Joelyn Goi; Michael Townsend; Scott A Ritchie; Jacob E Crawford; Nigel Snoad; Stephan Karl; Thomas R Burkot
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.278

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.