Literature DB >> 25186755

Molecular dissection of the interaction between the AMPA receptor and cornichon homolog-3.

Natalie F Shanks1, Ondrej Cais2, Tomohiko Maruo3, Jeffrey N Savas4, Elena I Zaika5, Caleigh M Azumaya5, John R Yates4, Ingo Greger2, Terunaga Nakagawa6.   

Abstract

Cornichon homologs (CNIHs) are AMPA-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) auxiliary subunits that modulate AMPAR ion channel function and trafficking. Mechanisms underlying this interaction and functional modulation of the receptor complex are currently unclear. Here, using proteins expressed from mouse and rat cDNA, we show that CNIH-3 forms a stable complex with tetrameric AMPARs and contributes to the transmembrane density in single-particle electron microscopy structures. Peptide array-based screening and in vitro mutagenesis identified two clusters of conserved membrane-proximal residues in CNIHs that contribute to AMPAR binding. Because CNIH-1 binds to AMPARs but modulates gating at a significantly lower magnitude compared with CNIH-3, these conserved residues mediate a direct interaction between AMPARs and CNIHs. In addition, residues in the extracellular loop of CNIH-2/3 absent in CNIH-1/4 are critical for both AMPAR interaction and gating modulation. On the AMPAR extracellular domains, the ligand-binding domain and possibly a stretch of linker, connecting the ligand-binding domain to the fourth membrane-spanning segment, is the principal contact point with the CNIH-3 extracellular loop. In contrast, the membrane-distal N-terminal domain is less involved in AMPAR gating modulation by CNIH-3 and AMPAR binding to CNIH-3. Collectively, our results identify conserved residues in the membrane-proximal region of CNIHs that contribute to AMPAR binding and an additional unique segment in the CNIH-2/3 extracellular loop required for both physical interaction and gating modulation of the AMPAR. Consistent with the dissociable properties of binding and gating modulation, we identified a mutant CNIH-3 that preserves AMPAR binding capability but has attenuated activity of gating modulation.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3412104-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMPA receptor; complex; cornichon; gating modulation; molecular mechanism; single particle EM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186755      PMCID: PMC4152608          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0595-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  Regulation of AMPA receptor gating by ligand binding core dimers.

Authors:  Michelle S Horning; Mark L Mayer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Code developments to improve the efficiency of automated MS/MS spectra interpretation.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov; Jimmy Eng; Eberhard Durr; Anita Saraf; Hayes McDonald; Michael J MacCoss; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome.

Authors:  Junmin Peng; Joshua E Elias; Carson C Thoreen; Larry J Licklider; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Interaction of the N-terminal domain of the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit with the neuronal pentraxin NP1 mediates GluR4 synaptic recruitment.

Authors:  Gek-Ming Sia; Jean-Claude Béïque; Gavin Rumbaugh; Richard Cho; Paul F Worley; Richard L Huganir
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Simultaneous and combinatorial chemical synthesis techniques for the generation and screening of molecular diversity.

Authors:  R Frank
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1995-07-31       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Separation of domain contacts is required for heterotetrameric assembly of functional NMDA receptors.

Authors:  Anthony N Farina; Katherine Y Blain; Tomohiko Maruo; Witek Kwiatkowski; Senyon Choe; Terunaga Nakagawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Acute cytotoxicity of ten chemicals in human and rat cultured hepatocytes and in cell lines: Correlation between in vitro data and human lethal concentrations.

Authors:  R Jover; X Ponsoda; J V Castell; M J Gómez-Lechón
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  TARP auxiliary subunits switch AMPA receptor antagonists into partial agonists.

Authors:  Karen Menuz; Robert M Stroud; Roger A Nicoll; Franklin A Hays
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The SOL-2/Neto auxiliary protein modulates the function of AMPA-subtype ionotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Jerry E Mellem; Michael Jensen; Penelope J Brockie; Craig S Walker; Frédéric J Hoerndli; Linda Hauth; David M Madsen; Andres V Maricq
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Extracellular interactions between GluR2 and N-cadherin in spine regulation.

Authors:  Laura Saglietti; Caroline Dequidt; Kinga Kamieniarz; Marie-Claude Rousset; Pamela Valnegri; Olivier Thoumine; Francesca Beretta; Laurent Fagni; Daniel Choquet; Carlo Sala; Morgan Sheng; Maria Passafaro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of critical functional determinants of kainate receptor modulation by auxiliary protein Neto2.

Authors:  Theanne N Griffith; Geoffrey T Swanson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The auxiliary subunits Neto1 and Neto2 have distinct, subunit-dependent effects at recombinant GluK1- and GluK2-containing kainate receptors.

Authors:  Janet L Fisher
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Engineering defined membrane-embedded elements of AMPA receptor induces opposing gating modulation by cornichon 3 and stargazin.

Authors:  Natalie M Hawken; Elena I Zaika; Terunaga Nakagawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Sex Differences in the Role of CNIH3 on Spatial Memory and Synaptic Plasticity.

Authors:  Hannah E Frye; Yukitoshi Izumi; Alexis N Harris; Sidney B Williams; Christopher R Trousdale; Min-Yu Sun; Andrew D Sauerbeck; Terrance T Kummer; Steven Mennerick; Charles F Zorumski; Elliot C Nelson; Joseph D Dougherty; Jose A Morón
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.

Authors:  Kasper B Hansen; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Derek Bowie; Hiro Furukawa; Frank S Menniti; Alexander I Sobolevsky; Geoffrey T Swanson; Sharon A Swanger; Ingo H Greger; Terunaga Nakagawa; Chris J McBain; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Chian-Ming Low; Mark L Dell'Acqua; Jeffrey S Diamond; Chad R Camp; Riley E Perszyk; Hongjie Yuan; Stephen F Traynelis
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 18.923

6.  Cooperative Dynamics of Intact AMPA and NMDA Glutamate Receptors: Similarities and Subfamily-Specific Differences.

Authors:  Anindita Dutta; James Krieger; Ji Young Lee; Javier Garcia-Nafria; Ingo H Greger; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  The dynamic AMPA receptor extracellular region: a platform for synaptic protein interactions.

Authors:  J García-Nafría; B Herguedas; J F Watson; I H Greger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Neonatal White Matter Microstructure.

Authors:  J Zhang; K Xia; M Ahn; S C Jha; R Blanchett; J J Crowley; J P Szatkiewicz; F Zou; H Zhu; M Styner; J H Gilmore; R C Knickmeyer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Gating and modulation of a hetero-octameric AMPA glutamate receptor.

Authors:  Danyang Zhang; Jake F Watson; Peter M Matthews; Ondrej Cais; Ingo H Greger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  AMPA receptor structure and auxiliary subunits.

Authors:  Aichurok Kamalova; Terunaga Nakagawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.