Literature DB >> 2518654

Treatment of hypertension based on both systolic and diastolic pressure could influence the cost of therapy.

M Safar1.   

Abstract

The decision to start antihypertensive treatment is based on the statistical results of therapeutic trials done in large populations. The application of statistical estimations may extend the indications for antihypertensive therapy to individual subjects who might be marginally improved by antihypertensive treatment. This problem is due to the well-known heterogeneity of the hypertensive population. One of the most common factors reflecting the heterogeneity of this population is the level of systolic pressure versus that of diastolic pressure. Disproportionate increases in systolic pressure in patients over 50 years reflect principally the arterial changes associated with elevated blood pressure. Arterial changes, as evidenced by the decreased compliance of large arteries, may require a specific therapeutic approach, which could influence the choice and consequently the cost of antihypertensive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2518654     DOI: 10.1007/bf01869569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  19 in total

1.  The mild hypertension dilemma: results of the British MRC trial.

Authors:  W E Miall
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 2.  Therapeutic trials and large arteries in hypertension.

Authors:  M Safar
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Enalapril in moderate to severe hypertension: a comparison with atenolol.

Authors:  J Webster; J C Petrie; O J Robb; J Trafford; J Burgess; P J Richardson; C Davidson; G Fairhurst; M J Vandenburg; W D Cooper
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Mortality and morbidity results from the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial.

Authors:  A Amery; W Birkenhäger; P Brixko; C Bulpitt; D Clement; M Deruyttere; A De Schaepdryver; C Dollery; R Fagard; F Forette
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-06-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Benefits and potential harm of lowering high blood pressure.

Authors:  J M Cruickshank; J M Thorp; F J Zacharias
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Hypertension detection and follow-up program. Baseline physical examination characteristics of the hypertensive participants.

Authors:  B F Polk; G Cutter; R M Daugherty; F Gosch; S Heyden; N Shulman; H A Tyroler
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 7.  Antihypertensive drug treatment. Potential, expected, and observed effects on stroke and on coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S MacMahon; J A Cutler; J Stamler
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A comparative multicentre study in general practice in Norway.

Authors:  A Helgeland; R Strømmen; C H Hagelund; S Tretli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Arterial dynamics, cardiac hypertrophy, and antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  M E Safar; J J Toto-Moukouo; J A Bouthier; R E Asmar; J A Levenson; A C Simon; G M London
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Report by the Management Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-06-14       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chronic antihypertensive treatment with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide improves aortic distensibility in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Authors:  J M Chillon; C Capdeville-Atkinson; I Lartaud; J Guillou; P M Mertès; J Atkinson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.739

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.