Literature DB >> 25186462

Dermatan sulfate epimerase 1 deficient mice as a model for human abdominal wall defects.

Renata Gustafsson1, Xanthi Stachtea, Marco Maccarana, Emma Grottling, Erik Eklund, Anders Malmström, Ake Oldberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermatan sulfate (DS) is a highly sulfated polysaccharide with a variety of biological functions in extracellular matrix organization and processes such as tumorigenesis and wound healing. A distinct feature of DS is the presence of iduronic acid, produced by the two enzymes, DS-epimerase 1 and 2, which are encoded by Dse and Dsel, respectively.
METHODS: We have previously shown that Dse knockout (KO) mice in a mixed C57BL/6-129/SvJ background have an altered collagen matrix structure in skin. In the current work we studied Dse KO mice in a pure NFR genetic background.
RESULTS: Dse KO embryos and newborns had kinked tails and histological staining revealed significantly thicker epidermal layers in Dse KO mice when compared with heterozygote (Het) or wild-type (WT) littermates. Immunochemical analysis of the epidermal layers in newborn pups showed increased expression of keratin 5 in the basal layer and keratin 1 in the spinous layer. In addition, we observed an abdominal wall defect with herniated intestines in 16% of the Dse KO embryos. Other, less frequent, developmental defects were exencephaly and spina bifida.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of defective collagen structure in the dermis and imbalanced keratinocyte maturation could be responsible for the observed developmental defects in Dse KO mice. In addition, we propose that Dse KO mice could be used as a model in pathogenetic studies of human fetal abdominal wall defects.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal wall defect; dermatan sulfate epimerase 1; embryonic development; epidermis; neural tube defects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186462      PMCID: PMC4233991          DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


Introduction

Proteoglycans (PGs) consist of a core protein with covalently attached glycosaminoglycan chains (GAGs). The PGs form large, complex structures in the extracellular connective tissue and play role in a wide variety of biological processes, including embryonic development, wound healing, cell proliferation and migration, growth factor binding and extracellular matrix organization (Bulow and Hobert, 2006; Esko et al., 2009). One GAG family includes chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS), the latter distinguished by the presence of iduronic acid (IdoA) (Thelin et al., 2013). IdoA, which is the C-5 epimer of D-glucuronic acid, occurs in variable amounts in DS and makes the DS chains more flexible (Thelin et al., 2013). DS-PGs include the small leucin-rich PGs decorin, biglycan and members from the lectican family such as versican (Malmstrom et al., 2012). The formation of DS requires the enzymes dermatan sulfate epimerase 1 (DS-epi1, encoded by Dse), dermatan sulfate epimerase 2 (DS-epi2, encoded by Dsel) and DS-4-O-sulfotransferase 1 (encoded by D4st1). Several studies have been undertaken to elucidate the function of DS. We have shown that mice deficient in DS-epi1 were viable in a mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background, and their skin was more fragile due to altered collagen fibril morphology compared with their WT littermates (Maccarana et al., 2009), thus demonstrating the importance of IdoA in skin development. In addition, mutations in the human DSE and D4ST1 genes result in subtypes of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (Miyake et al., 2010; Muller et al., 2013). DS-epi1 is the major contributor of epimerase activity, and mice deficient in DS-epi2 do not display any significant defects (Bartolini et al., 2012), thus showing that DS-epi1 is able to compensate for the absence of DS-epi2 in most tissues except for the brain (Bartolini et al., 2012). Because earlier experiments during the generation of the DS-epi1 KO mice in pure C57BL/6 genetic background indicated a high frequency of perinatal lethality, mice from the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background were back-crossed into mice with pure NFR genetic background. The NFR strain is an albino Swiss mouse originating from an inbred NMRI mouse strain developed and maintained at the National Institute of Health (Bethesda, MD). We chose the NFR strain because the females are known to produce large litters (Liljander et al., 2009). The aim of the current study was to elucidate if DS-epi1 deficiency causes early embryonic developmental defects.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the ethical committee for animal experiments in Lund, Sweden (permit number: M164-10).

Mice

Mice deficient in DS-epi1 in the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background (Maccarana et al., 2009) were backcrossed with mice in pure C57BL/6 or NFR background (the later kindly provided by Prof. Ragnar Matsson, Lund University, Sweden) for more than 10 generations. Het and KO mice in NFR background were mated to obtain a high ratio of the Dse KO genotype. In addition, Dse Het/Het mice were mated to obtain WT, Dse Het and KO newborn pups (one litter). Time-mated pregnant Dse Het females were euthanized and embryos from embryonic day E13.5 to E18.5 and newborn pups were harvested and body weight was measured. Mice were genotyped by PCR on extracted DNA from tail (mothers) or yolk sac (embryos and newborn) with the following primers: forward primer for both alleles, 5′-AGCACATTGCAGCTCGGCTTAC-3′; reverse primer for the wild-type allele, 5′-GCTGCCATCCTCTCCATGTAGTC-3′; reverse primer for the neomycin cassette-mutated allele, 5′-TGGATGTGGAATGTGTGCGAGG-3′.

Morphological Analysis

Embryos at stages E13.5, E16.5, E18.5, and tails from newborn pups were washed in ice cold PBS and immersed in HistoChoice tissue fixative (Amresco Inc). Embryos and newborn tails were fixed for 2 days (E13.5, E16.5, and tails) or 5 days (E18.5). After fixation tissues were rinsed in PBS, dehydrated in a series of rising ethanol concentrations, two changes of xylene, paraffin overnight, then embedded in paraffin and serially sectioned (5 μm). For histological assessment, Masson's trichrome staining of whole embryonic sections was performed using the “Accustain trichrome stain (Masson)” (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Stained sections were scanned and digitalized using an Aperio ScanScope digital slide scanner (Scanscope Console v8.2.0.1263, Aperio Technologies, Inc., Vista, CA). For morphological measurements on Dse Het and KO embryonic epidermis, 2 to 5 consecutive sagittal sections from E13.5, E16.5, and E18.5 embryos were analyzed by measuring the epidermis from stratum basale to stratum corneum around the whole embryonic section with approximately 70-µm intervals (up to 130 measurements per section were performed). For morphological measurements on WT, Dse Het and KO tail epidermal thickness (n = 3 for each genotype), transverse sections from 3 different locations (at least 100 µm apart) were measured around the tail epidermis with approximately 70-µm intervals between measurement points and up to 70 measurements per tail section.

Immunofluorescence Staining

Paraffin sections from WT, Dse Het, and KO tails from 3 different locations (n = 3 for each genotype) were rehydrated in decreasing ethanol concentrations and rinsed in PBS. Sections were blocked in 1.5% goat serum and 0.05% Tween/PBS for 1 hr and incubated with primary antibodies (all from Abcam) produced in rabbit against keratin 1 (dilution 1:1000; ab24643), keratin 5 (dilution 1:1000; ab24647), loricrin (dilution 1:200; ab24722), and Ki67 (dilution 1:200; ab16667) overnight at +4°C. Next, sections were rinsed in PBS and incubated with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies produced in goat (dilution 1:200; Alexa Fluor® 488; A11008; Invitrogen), for 2 hr. After incubation, sections were rinsed, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol and dipped in xylene. Slides were mounted with Vectamount containing DAPI (Vector Labs), and staining was visualized using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Instruments, Japan). Ki67 immunolabeling for proliferation in the epidermal layers (n = 3 for each genotype) was analyzed by ImageJ software using the “Analyze Particles” function.

Western Blot

Whole body skin (dermis and epidermis) were harvested from newborn WT, Dse Het and KO pups (n = 3 per genotype). Samples (60–100 mg) were homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer on ice in 10 volumes of extraction buffer (Tris 50 mM, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% DOC, 1% NP-40, 1% SDS, 1 mM DTT, protease inhibitors from Roche, 1mM PMSF), and an equal amount of protein (6 µg per well) was loaded and run on 10% SDS-PAGE. The gels were transferred to PVDF membrane (Hybond™-P, Amersham) and probed first with the primary antibodies against keratin 1 or keratin 5 (dilution 1:3000, ab24643, and ab24647, respectively; Abcam) and Gapdh (dilution 1:2000, sc47724; Santa Cruz) and then with the secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (dilution 1:4000, goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, sc2004, Santa Cruz). Signals were detected using ECL Plus detection system (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's instructions and analyzed in ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis on embryonic epidermal thickness was analyzed using two-way ANOVA with time and genotype as factors. Analysis was performed in SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY). Statistical analysis on tail epidermal thickness and results from ImageJ analysis were performed on GraphPad Prism Version 6.0 using Student's t test or one-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Error bars are SEM if not stated otherwise in the figure text.

Results

Generation of Dse KO Mice in Pure C57BL/6 and NFR Genetic Backgrounds

Different genetic backgrounds may generate diverse phenotypes for the same genetic mutation (Montagutelli, 2000). This is also the case for DS-epi1-deficient mice. In mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background, the KO mice were viable and presented at the expected Mendelian frequency (Table 1) and could be characterized as adults (Maccarana et al., 2009). These mice were backcrossed with mice of either C57BL/6 or NFR genetic background for more than 10 generations. In the C57BL/6 genetic background, all Dse KO mice died perinatally (Table1), while at E14.5/E15.5 they were present at the expected Mendelian frequency. In the current study the major focus was on mice in the NFR genetic background in which 155 embryos in total were analyzed. We demonstrated that in the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background, Dse Het mice had approximately half the amount of the DS-epi1 enzyme compared with WT littermates. Despite this fact, the amount, the length and the structure of CS/DS chains were identical in Dse Het mice compared with WT littermates (Maccarana et al., 2009). Therefore, to achieve the highest numbers of Dse KO embryos for developmental studies, Dse Het mice were generally mated with Dse KO mice. The resulting offspring had a Mendelian distribution between Dse Het and Dse KO genotypes. Approximately 70% (12 of 17 newborn pups from 4 litters) of the Dse KO pups were dead or dying at birth (Table 1).
Table 1

Genotypes and Mendelian ratios

BackgroundGenotype/MatingAgeMice no.Dse WTDse HetDse KO
C57BL/6Het/HetE14.5 - E15.5468 (17%)23 (50%)15 (33%)
C57BL/6Het/HetNewborn5116 (31%)28 (55%)7 (14%)a
C57BL/6Het/HetWeaning7224 (33%)48 (67%)0
NFRHet/KOE13.5 - Newborn143b-69 (48%)74 (52%)
NFRHet/HetNewborn12c6 (50%)3 (25%)3 (25%)
C57BL/6–129/SvJHet/HetWeaning19819865 (33%)97 (49%)36 (18%)

Out of seven pups: 3 dead and 3 dying right after birth

Out of three litters of newborn pups: 2 Het and 9 KO dead or dying right after birth

Out of twelve pups: 2 WT, 1 Het and 3 KO dead or dying right after birth

Published in Maccarana et al., 2009

Genotypes and Mendelian ratios Out of seven pups: 3 dead and 3 dying right after birth Out of three litters of newborn pups: 2 Het and 9 KO dead or dying right after birth Out of twelve pups: 2 WT, 1 Het and 3 KO dead or dying right after birth Published in Maccarana et al., 2009

Developmental Defects in Dse KO Embryos in Pure NFR Genetic Background

Previously we reported a 20 to 30% reduction of body weight in Dse KO mice compared with their WT littermates in mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background (Maccarana et al., 2009). Analysis of Dse KO embryos and Dse Het littermates in the NFR genetic background showed similar body weights during embryonic development and a marginal decrease (6%) at birth (p = 0.27; Suppl. Fig. 1) (which is available online). All Dse KO embryos in pure NFR genetic background had kinked tails (Fig. 1A′, black arrow; Table 2), similar to Dse KO embryos in the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background. Twenty-one percent of the Dse KO embryos showed other severe developmental defects (Table 2). The dominating defect, seen in 16% of the Dse KO embryos, was an abdominal wall defect (AWD) with herniated intestines (Fig. 1A′, 1B′, and C, empty arrowheads; Table 2). During normal mouse development from approximately E12.5, loops of the midgut protrude through the abdominal wall at the umbilicus, a phenomenon denoted as physiological umbilical hernia. By E15.5, retraction of the intestines into the peritoneal cavity begins and by E16.5 the ventral body wall closes (Brewer and Williams, 2004a). In the Dse Het embryos the physiological umbilical hernia has been fully resolved by E16.5. In the Dse KO embryos, however, herniated intestines were seen outside of the ventral body wall together with remnants of a thin membrane (Fig. 1B′ and Suppl. Fig. 2, black arrows). There was no apparent difference in the size of the umbilical ring between Dse KO and Dse Het, and the appearance of the umbilical cord was similar. Other defects observed in 5% of the Dse KO mice were: exencephaly (Fig. 1D), spina bifida, and ringelschwanz (Kokubu et al., 2004) (Table 2). None of the Dse WT or Het embryos had detectable developmental defects.
Figure 1

Representative images on Dse KO embryos with embryological defects: kinked tail, AWD, and exencephaly. A: Dse Het and (A′) Dse KO embryo at E18.5 with kinked tail (black arrow) and AWD (empty arrowhead). B: Masson's trichrome staining of sagittal sections on E16.5 Dse Het embryo showing the closed ventral body wall with only the umbilical cord outside of the body, while (B′) Dse KO embryo shows AWD with part of the midgut (empty arrowhead) outside of the body, close to the umbilical cord and surrounded by remnants of a thin membrane (black arrow). C: Magnification of the abdominal area in an E18.5 Dse KO embryo showing intestinal herniation through the umbilical ring (empty arrowhead). D: Exencephaly was observed in one Dse KO embryo (E18.5). Abbreviations: Gt, genital tubercle; Hg, herniated gut; Li, liver; Mg, midgut; Uc, umbilical cord.

Table 2

Phenotypes in NFR genetic background

GenotypeKinked tailHerniated gutOther defects: Exencephaly; Spina bifida; Ringelschwanz
Dse WT000
Dse Het000
Dse KO77 (100%)12 (16%)a4 (5%)a

Percentage out of total seventy-seven KO embryos and pups

Representative images on Dse KO embryos with embryological defects: kinked tail, AWD, and exencephaly. A: Dse Het and (A′) Dse KO embryo at E18.5 with kinked tail (black arrow) and AWD (empty arrowhead). B: Masson's trichrome staining of sagittal sections on E16.5 Dse Het embryo showing the closed ventral body wall with only the umbilical cord outside of the body, while (B′) Dse KO embryo shows AWD with part of the midgut (empty arrowhead) outside of the body, close to the umbilical cord and surrounded by remnants of a thin membrane (black arrow). C: Magnification of the abdominal area in an E18.5 Dse KO embryo showing intestinal herniation through the umbilical ring (empty arrowhead). D: Exencephaly was observed in one Dse KO embryo (E18.5). Abbreviations: Gt, genital tubercle; Hg, herniated gut; Li, liver; Mg, midgut; Uc, umbilical cord. Phenotypes in NFR genetic background Percentage out of total seventy-seven KO embryos and pups

Thicker Epidermis in Dse KO Embryos and Newborn Mice

Embryos at E13.5, E16.5, and E18.5, and tails from newborn pups, were paraffin embedded and sectioned. The skin surface of Dse KO pups appeared similar to that of their Dse Het littermates. Upon histological examination, however, Dse KO skin revealed a thickening of the epidermis. The thickness of the epidermal layers from stratum basale to stratum corneum was measured around the whole body of the embryos and on the newborn tails. Morphometric measurements indicated that Dse KO embryos had approximately 27% thicker epidermal layer compared with Dse Het littermates over time from E13.5 to E18.5 (p = 0.019) (Fig. 2A). In addition, measurements of newborn tail epidermis indicated that Dse KO had 21% thicker epidermal layer compared with Dse WT and 17% thicker epidermal layer compared with Dse Het littermates (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2

Dse KO embryos and newborns have thicker epidermis. A: Representative images on latero-sagittal sectioned Dse Het and KO embryos at E16.5. Morphometric measurements on the epidermal layer from E13.5 to E18.5 indicated increased thickness over time with a significant difference between the genotypes (p = 0.019) with an average of 4.95 µm (27%) thicker layer (95% CI, 1.09–10.61) in Dse KO than in Dse Het littermates. B: Representative images on transversely sectioned tails from WT, Dse Het and KO newborn pups. Morphometric measurements indicated a significantly thicker epidermal layer in Dse KO mice than in WT (8.11 µm, 95% CI, 3.93–12.3) and in Dse Het littermates (6.9 µm, 95% CI, 2.71–11.1), respectively (Scale bars = 100 µm). Brackets in Dse KO images indicate the epidermal layer (from stratum basale to stratum corneum). Abbreviations: E, epidermis; D, dermis; H, hypodermis. Morphometric measurements were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (embryonic epidermis) or Student's t test and one-way ANOVA (newborn tail). **indicates p < 0.01. Error bars are SEM.

Dse KO embryos and newborns have thicker epidermis. A: Representative images on latero-sagittal sectioned Dse Het and KO embryos at E16.5. Morphometric measurements on the epidermal layer from E13.5 to E18.5 indicated increased thickness over time with a significant difference between the genotypes (p = 0.019) with an average of 4.95 µm (27%) thicker layer (95% CI, 1.09–10.61) in Dse KO than in Dse Het littermates. B: Representative images on transversely sectioned tails from WT, Dse Het and KO newborn pups. Morphometric measurements indicated a significantly thicker epidermal layer in Dse KO mice than in WT (8.11 µm, 95% CI, 3.93–12.3) and in Dse Het littermates (6.9 µm, 95% CI, 2.71–11.1), respectively (Scale bars = 100 µm). Brackets in Dse KO images indicate the epidermal layer (from stratum basale to stratum corneum). Abbreviations: E, epidermis; D, dermis; H, hypodermis. Morphometric measurements were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (embryonic epidermis) or Student's t test and one-way ANOVA (newborn tail). **indicates p < 0.01. Error bars are SEM.

Alterations in the Epidermal Layers in Dse KO Mice

One explanation for increased epidermal thickness in Dse KO mice could be defective differentiation of the keratinocytes in the epidermal layers (Byrne et al., 1994; Fuchs and Raghavan, 2002). To study this, we used keratin 5, a marker for immature keratinocytes in the epidermal basal layer (stratum basale), which showed stronger staining intensity in tail sections from newborn Dse KO than in WT and Dse Het pups at the basal layer (Fig. 3A). In addition, Western blot analysis of whole skin extracts from WT, Dse Het, and Dse KO newborn pups showed approximately a 1.6-fold increase in keratin 5 expression in Dse KO skin compared with WT skin (Fig. 3B). Thickening of the epidermal layer could also depend on expanding epidermal spinous layer (stratum spinosum). Indeed, staining for the spinous layer marker, keratin 1, showed more intense immunoreactivity in newborn tail sections from Dse KO pups than in WT and Dse Het pups (Fig. 3A). However, there were no significant differences in the expression of keratin 1 assessed by Western blot analysis from whole skin extracts between the genotypes (not shown). Staining for loricrin, which is a marker for the granule cell layer (stratum granulosum), did not indicate any increased expression in Dse KO compared with WT or Dse Het pups (Fig. 3A). In addition, immunolabeling for Ki67 showed slightly decreased proliferation in Dse Het and KO epidermal basal layer compared with WT littermates; however the difference between the genotypes was not significant (Suppl. Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Expression of the epidermal layer markers in WT, Dse Het, and KO epidermis. A: Immunohistochemical staining of transversally sectioned newborn tails from WT, Dse Het and Dse KO mice for loricrin, keratin1 and keratin 5 (green) and Dapi (blue). Note enhanced keratin 1 staining in the spinous layer and keratin 5 staining in the basal layer in Dse KO epidermis compared with WT and Dse Het epidermis (n=3 for each genotype). Dotted line denotes the dermo–epidermal border. Abbreviations: Gr, granular layer; Sp, spinous layer; B, basal layer; D, dermis. (Scale bars = 50 µm). B: Densitometric analysis and representative western blot images of keratin 5 on whole body skin extracts from newborn WT, Dse Het and Dse KO mice (n = 3 for each genotype). There was a 1.6-fold increase in keratin 5 expression in Dse KO skin compared with WT skin. Gapdh was used as internal loading control. Gel images were analyzed in ImageJ program, and statistical differences were calculated by one-way ANOVA. AU, arbitrary units. Error bars are SEM.

Expression of the epidermal layer markers in WT, Dse Het, and KO epidermis. A: Immunohistochemical staining of transversally sectioned newborn tails from WT, Dse Het and Dse KO mice for loricrin, keratin1 and keratin 5 (green) and Dapi (blue). Note enhanced keratin 1 staining in the spinous layer and keratin 5 staining in the basal layer in Dse KO epidermis compared with WT and Dse Het epidermis (n=3 for each genotype). Dotted line denotes the dermo–epidermal border. Abbreviations: Gr, granular layer; Sp, spinous layer; B, basal layer; D, dermis. (Scale bars = 50 µm). B: Densitometric analysis and representative western blot images of keratin 5 on whole body skin extracts from newborn WT, Dse Het and Dse KO mice (n = 3 for each genotype). There was a 1.6-fold increase in keratin 5 expression in Dse KO skin compared with WT skin. Gapdh was used as internal loading control. Gel images were analyzed in ImageJ program, and statistical differences were calculated by one-way ANOVA. AU, arbitrary units. Error bars are SEM.

Discussion

In the present work, we studied the embryonic and newborn phenotype of KO mice deficient in the enzyme DS-epi1 in pure NFR background. Beside the AWD and neural tube defects (NTDs), the cause of death in the rest of the pups was possibly due to respiratory or circulatory failure, because some of the live-born Dse KO pups that died turned cyanotic soon after birth. Similar observations were made in the few live-born pups in the pure C57BL/6 genetic background. Respiratory failure was probably also a cause of death in mice with targeted mutations for heparan sulfate (HS) biosynthetic enzymes such as Ndst1 (Ringvall and Kjellen, 2010) and the epimerase Glce (Li et al., 2003). It is a common finding that a more severe phenotype due to gene ablation is seen in mice with a pure genetic background, such as in both C57BL/6 and NFR mouse models, than in mice with a mixed genetic background.

Abdominal Wall Defect in Dse KO Mice

The dominating developmental defect in Dse KO mice in pure NFR background is an AWD with herniated intestines, noted in 16% of the embryos and newborn pups. Recent findings indicate herniation of the intestines in some of the Dse/Dsel double KO embryos from the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background (unpublished observations, X. Stachtea). In humans, the two major AWDs are omphalocele (OC) and gastroschisis (GS), with a combined incidence of approximately 6/10.000 live births (Prefumo and Izzi, 2014). Although similar in many aspects, they show important differences regarding appearance, etiology, co-morbidity and prognosis (Prefumo and Izzi, 2014). OC is the result of an enlarged umbilical ring, allowing parts of the abdominal contents to herniate to the outside of the abdominal cavity. The extra-abdominal organs are covered by peritoneum and by the amnion membrane continuous with the umbilical cord, while the protruded contents are located at the base of the cord. Being strongly associated with other congenital defects and syndromes, the etiology of OC is considered to be mainly genetic. In contrast, in GS, no hernial sac is present, and the defect is located outside of the umbilical ring, typically on the right side. The appearance of the umbilicus (ring and cord) is normal. Although generally thought to be a result of environmental factors, familial GS does occur, and the estimated familial recurrence risk of 2.4 to 4.7% (Torfs and Curry, 1993; Kohl et al., 2010), indicates that there is a genetic contribution in some cases. In a few KO mouse models, the AWDs have been classified and/or described as GS. However, it is hard to compare the different suggested models of GS because the described features are very diverse (Carnaghan et al., 2013). Phenotypically, most of the existing mouse models seem to be a mixture of OC and GS, including mice deficient in Scrib (Carnaghan et al., 2013; Murdoch et al., 2003), Aebp1 (Layne et al., 2001; Danzer et al., 2010), Bmp1 (Suzuki et al., 1996), and Tfap2a (Brewer and Williams, 2004b) (description summarized in Table 3). Our mouse model also showed features of both conditions, but the location of the defect was that of an OC. However, the defect seemed to be separated from the umbilical cord, which had a normal appearance, in concordance with GS. Similarly, the umbilical ring did not seem to be enlarged. On the contrary, although no intestines were seen to have a covering membrane, remnants of a thin membrane at the base of the extra-abdominal contents gave the impression that there had been a previous cover, thus resembling an OC.
Table 3

Comparison of mouse KO models with abdominal wall defects with human gastroschisis (GS) and omphalocele (OC).

Exact locationUmbilical Ring (UR)Umbilical Cord (UC)CoveringProtruded organsPenetranceGene analysis in human GS-patientsReferences
Human defect
GSTo the right of umbilicusNormalNormal appearance, separated from the defectNoBowel and occationally other organs
OCUREnlargedHernia in the base of UCYes (peritoneum and amnion membrane)Bowel and occationally other organs
Mouse model
Aebp1Adjacent to the umbilicusNA*NANoBowel, liver100%No disease-causing mutations in 40 patientsLayne et al, 2001; Danzer et al. 2010; Feldkamp et al, 2012
Tfap-2aUREnlargedNANoBowel, liverNABrewer and Williams, 2004
Bmp1NANANANoBowel78–84%No mutations in 11 patientsSuzuki et al. 1996; Komuro et al, 2001
Scrib (2 different types of AWDs)UR                 Enlarged Complete failure of ventral abdominal wall closureHernia in the base of UC Normal appearance, membrane in continuation with that of UCYes Yes (only thin, ruptured membrane)Bowel, liver Bowel, liver, stomach, spleen23% in total (both AWDs)Camaghan et al, 2013
DseURNormal appearanceNormal appearance, separated from the defectYes (only thin, ruptured membrane)Bowel16%(present study)

The table shows the comparison of six KO models of AWD with specific clinical and developmental features of the most common human AWDs, GS and OC respectively.

NA = non applicable

Comparison of mouse KO models with abdominal wall defects with human gastroschisis (GS) and omphalocele (OC). The table shows the comparison of six KO models of AWD with specific clinical and developmental features of the most common human AWDs, GS and OC respectively. NA = non applicable Although all these “GSmouse models, including ours, have several characteristics in common with human GS, it has yet to be established whether they suffice as model systems for the defect. In none of the models has the defect been described as located outside of the umbilical ring, which constitutes a major difference to that of the human phenotype. Information about the umbilical ring size and cord appearance is often incomplete in the reports. Also, in general, there are uncertainties regarding the comparability of the ventral abdominal wall development between the two species. It is known that the location of the yolk sac differs between mice and humans, and this structure could play an important role in the pathogenesis of GS (Feldkamp et al., 2007; Stevenson et al., 2009). The pathogenesis of the AWD in our model is uncertain, but given the collagen phenotype in the Dse KO skin (Maccarana et al., 2009), IdoA content could play an important role for proper collagen maturation and closure of the ventral body during embryogenesis. This is supported by the notion that mice deficient in BMP-1, a matrix metalloproteinase processing the C-terminal propeptide of fibrillar pro-collagens I, II and III, also develop an AWD (Suzuki et al., 1996). Furthermore, failure of ventral body closure could be ascribed to lack of FGFR1 and FGFR2 signaling, because conditionally mutated Fgfr1/Fgfr2 mice exhibit disruption in the secondary abdominal wall patterning closest to the skin and ventral midline, resulting in OC (Nichol et al., 2011). Further research is needed regarding normal development of the abdominal wall in mice and humans as well as the pathogenesis of different AWDs.

Neural Tube Defects in Dse KO Mice

In the present study, 5% of the Dse KO mice exhibited exencephaly or spina bifida, i.e., NTDs. The equivalent of exencephaly in humans is called anencephaly, in which the child is born without the major part of the brain (the exencephaly evolves into anencephaly because the brain is degenerated upon exposure to the amniotic fluid). The causes of NTDs are multifactorial and probably depend on both genetic and environmental factors (Copp et al., 2013). Exencephaly results from failure to close the cranial portion of the neural tube in early development during the primary neurulation (Wallingford et al., 2013), whereas spina bifida results from a more distal closure failure. Deficiencies in several genes have been shown to cause these malformations, and there are several mouse models (Harris and Juriloff, 2010). The penetrance is varying depending both on the gene and the mouse strain. For example in mice deficient in Splotch, the penetrance of the exencephaly phenotype was almost 80 % in one background and only 40% in another (Fleming and Copp, 2000). This can explain why no pups with exencephaly were seen in Dse KO mice from the mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background (Maccarana et al., 2009).

Thicker Epidermal Layers in Dse KO Mice

The present study demonstrates the importance of IdoA content in DS-PGs during epidermal morphogenesis, because histological staining indicates a thickening of the epidermis in Dse KO embryos and newborn pups. Both the epidermis and the neural tube derive from the ectoderm. The neural tube is formed from the neural plate that consists of a thickened ectoderm, separated from the epidermis at the neural plate borders. The neural plate borders serve as the adjoining points when the neural tube closes (Aybar et al., 2002). Given this joint origin, the thickened epidermis and the NTDs might have a common mechanism in our mouse model. One of the functions of CS/DS-PGs is to bind and store growth factors. During development of the neural plate border, a cascade of signaling events orchestrated by growth factors (e.g., FGFs, EGFs) and morphogens (e.g., WNTs) takes place (Groves and LaBonne, 2014). Highly sulfated GAGs such as HS and DS are crucial for these signaling pathways (Niehrs, 2012). Deletion of Ndst1 not only causes respiratory failure (Ringvall and Kjellen, 2010), but also NTDs (exencephaly and spina bifida) at a similar penetrance as ours (6%) in one model (Pallerla et al., 2007). It is possible that there is a partial redundancy between DS and HS in these signaling pathways, which could explain the relatively low penetrance of these phenotypes. Transcription factor AP-2α (Tfap2a) induces the expression of several epidermally related genes (Byrne et al., 1994). Mice deficient in Tfap2a exhibited severe ventral body wall defects (Brewer and Williams, 2004b) and had elevated expression levels of EGF receptor in the epidermis (Wang et al., 2006). However, these mice showed increased cell proliferation in the basal layer of the epidermis, which is opposite to the slightly decreased proliferation observed in Dse KO epidermal basal layer. The epidermal thickening in Dse KO mice correlated with an increased staining for the basal layer marker, keratin 5, and the spinous layer marker, keratin 1. Of interest, expression of dominant-negative FGFR in mice resulted in thickened epidermal layers and an increased expression of keratin 14 in the basal epidermal layer (Werner et al., 1993). Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF or FGF-7), FGF2 and FGF10 have been shown to preferentially bind to IdoA-containing motifs in CS/DS-PGs, promoting proliferative processes during wound healing (Taylor et al., 2005; Plichta and Radek, 2012). It is tempting to speculate that lower IdoA content in the dermal and epidermal interstitium may affect FGF-signaling leading to the different phenotypes observed in Dse KO mice. Paracrine signals from fibroblasts in the dermis toward the keratinocytes in the epidermis may be delayed as a result of lowered binding capacity for growth factors in Dse KO skin. Furthermore, decorin deficient mice have higher amounts of CS/DS in the skin, but with less charge, similar to the structure of DS produced in the Dse KO mice in mixed C57BL/6–129/SvJ genetic background (Maccarana et al., 2009; Nikolovska et al., 2014). Highly-sulfated GAGs from decorin deficient fibroblast and keratinocytes co-cultured in 3D-condition caused a delayed keratinocyte differentiation (Nikolovska et al. 2014), a finding that could be applied on the Dse KO epidermal phenotype, because proliferation in the epidermal basal layer, assessed by Ki67 staining, was somewhat lower in Dse KO compared with WT skin. In conclusion, DS-epi1 deficiency in pure NFR mice generated several developmental malformations, with AWD being the dominant defect. In addition, Dse KO mice had thicker epidermal layers and an increased expression of the epidermal basal and spinous layer markers. With regard to the increasing tendency of various AWDs in neonates worldwide, our Dse null mice could serve as a model for human AWDs. In addition, this model could be a useful tool in search for etiological and pathogenetical mechanisms causing AWDs.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis.

Authors:  Elaine Fuchs; Srikala Raghavan
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Extracellular signals, cell interactions and transcription factors involved in the induction of the neural crest cells.

Authors:  Manuel J Aybar; Alvaro Glavic; Roberto Mayor
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.612

3.  Impaired abdominal wall development and deficient wound healing in mice lacking aortic carboxypeptidase-like protein.

Authors:  M D Layne; S F Yet; K Maemura; C M Hsieh; M Bernfield; M A Perrella; M E Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Familial cases of gastroschisis in a population-based registry.

Authors:  C P Torfs; C J Curry
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1993-02-15

Review 5.  Effect of the genetic background on the phenotype of mouse mutations.

Authors:  X Montagutelli
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  A genetic risk factor for mouse neural tube defects: defining the embryonic basis.

Authors:  A Fleming; A J Copp
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Targeted disruption of a murine glucuronyl C5-epimerase gene results in heparan sulfate lacking L-iduronic acid and in neonatal lethality.

Authors:  Jin-Ping Li; Feng Gong; Asa Hagner-McWhirter; Erik Forsberg; Magnus Abrink; Robert Kisilevsky; Xiao Zhang; Ulf Lindahl
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Disruption of scribble (Scrb1) causes severe neural tube defects in the circletail mouse.

Authors:  Jennifer N Murdoch; Deborah J Henderson; Kit Doudney; Carles Gaston-Massuet; Helen M Phillips; Caroline Paternotte; Ruth Arkell; Philip Stanier; Andrew J Copp
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Skeletal defects in ringelschwanz mutant mice reveal that Lrp6 is required for proper somitogenesis and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chikara Kokubu; Ulrich Heinzmann; Tomoko Kokubu; Norio Sakai; Takuo Kubota; Masanobu Kawai; Matthias B Wahl; Juan Galceran; Rudolf Grosschedl; Keiichi Ozono; Kenji Imai
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Loss of AP-2alpha impacts multiple aspects of ventral body wall development and closure.

Authors:  Stephanie Brewer; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 3.582

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dermatan Sulfate-Free Mice Display Embryological Defects and Are Neonatal Lethal Despite Normal Lymphoid and Non-Lymphoid Organogenesis.

Authors:  Xanthi N Stachtea; Emil Tykesson; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Ricardo Feinstein; Anders Malmström; Rogier M Reijmers; Marco Maccarana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and neurocristopathies: dermatan sulfate is required for Xenopus neural crest cells to migrate and adhere to fibronectin.

Authors:  Nadège Gouignard; Marco Maccarana; Ina Strate; Kristoffer von Stedingk; Anders Malmström; Edgar M Pera
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 3.  Recent Advances in the Pathophysiology of Musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Authors:  Tomoki Kosho; Shuji Mizumoto; Takafumi Watanabe; Takahiro Yoshizawa; Noriko Miyake; Shuhei Yamada
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Animal Models of Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes: Phenotype, Pathogenesis, and Translational Potential.

Authors:  Robin Vroman; Anne-Marie Malfait; Rachel E Miller; Fransiska Malfait; Delfien Syx
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  An Overview of in vivo Functions of Chondroitin Sulfate and Dermatan Sulfate Revealed by Their Deficient Mice.

Authors:  Shuji Mizumoto; Shuhei Yamada
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 6.  Chondrodysplasias With Multiple Dislocations Caused by Defects in Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis.

Authors:  Johanne Dubail; Valérie Cormier-Daire
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Gene expression of the two developmentally regulated dermatan sulfate epimerases in the Xenopus embryo.

Authors:  Nadège Gouignard; Tanja Schön; Christian Holmgren; Ina Strate; Emirhan Taşöz; Franziska Wetzel; Marco Maccarana; Edgar M Pera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Systematic analysis of migration factors by MigExpress identifies essential cell migration control genes in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jagriti Pal; Andrea C Becker; Sonam Dhamija; Jeanette Seiler; Mahmoud Abdelkarim; Yogita Sharma; Jürgen Behr; Chen Meng; Christina Ludwig; Bernhard Kuster; Sven Diederichs
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.