| Literature DB >> 25186162 |
Marc A L M Boone1, Gregor B E Jemec, V Del Marmol.
Abstract
Differentiation of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is important because of different management requirements. Various non-invasive tests have been used in an attempt to improve diagnosis. In irritant dermatitis, thickening of the epidermis has been a constant finding. High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography (HD-OCT) is a non-invasive real-time three-dimensional imaging technique with cellular resolution for which an adapted algorithmic method for pattern analysis discriminating inflammatory skin diseases has been proposed. The aim of this study was threefold. (1) To evaluate the correlation between HD-OCT features and clinical scores of allergic and irritant patch test reactions. (2) To explore the potential of HD-OCT in optimizing the visual patch test scoring. (3) To assess in vivo the cytological and 3-D micro-architectural differences in skin reaction types between doubtful positive ACD and ICD. Twenty-two volunteers were patch tested using potassium(VI)dichromate, cobalt(II)chloride, nickel(II) sulfate and palladium(II)chloride. Visual patch test scoring and HD-OCT assisted patch test scoring were performed at 48 and 96 h after patch test application according to ECDRG guidelines. Selected HD-OCT features correlated well with clinical severity scores. HD-OCT assessment improved the visual patch test scoring although not significantly. Increased epidermal thickness observed in ICD at first reading was a significant finding useful in differentiating doubtful (+?) ACD from irritant (IR) ICD reactions. In conclusion, HD-OCT might be a unique tool for in vivo non-invasive real-time three-dimensional epidermal thickness measurements helping to differentiate IR from doubtful (+?) reactions in patch testing. Selected HD-OCT features corresponded well with severity of visual scoring. These features might help to quantify the degree of inflammation in inflammatory skin conditions. HD-OCT might help in optimizing visual patch test scoring in some situations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25186162 PMCID: PMC4282878 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-014-1492-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dermatol Res ISSN: 0340-3696 Impact factor: 3.017
Recording of patch test reactions according to the international Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) [4]
| +? | Doubtful reaction; faint erythema only |
| + | Weak positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, possibly papules |
| ++ | Strong positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles |
| +++ | Extreme positive reaction; intense erythema and infiltration and coalescing vesicles |
| − | Negative reaction |
| IR | Irritant reaction of different types |
| NT | Not tested |
Visual (V) and HD-OCT assisted (H) patch test scoring
| # Subject | First reading after 48 H | Second reading After 96 H | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | Co | Ni | Pd | Cr | Co | Ni | Pd | |||||||||
| V | H | V | H | V | H | V | H | V | H | V | H | V | H | V | H | |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | +? | +? | +? | +? | – | – | – | – | +/++ | +/++ | + | + |
| 2 | +? | +? | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – |
| 3 | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – |
|
|
| 4 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | – | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | – | – |
| 5 | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + |
|
|
| 6 | + |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | IR | IR | IR | IR |
| 7 | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – |
| 8 | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| 9 | – | – | + | + | +++ | +++ | + | + | – | – | + | + | +++ | +++ | + | + |
| 10 | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – |
| 11 | IR | IR | IR | IR | +? | +? | + |
| IR | IR | IR | IR | + | + | IR | IR |
| 12 | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – |
| 13 | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | IR | IR |
| 14 | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| – | – |
| 15 | – | – | – | – | +? | +? | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | +? | +? |
| 16 | IR | IR | – | – | + | + | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| 17 | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – |
|
| – | – |
| 18 | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | – | – | IR | IR | – | – | – | – |
|
|
| 19 | IR | IR | – | – | +/++ | +/++ | +? | +? | – | – | – | – | ++ | ++ |
|
|
| 20 | – | – | IR | IR | + | + | + | + | – | – | + |
| ++ | ++ | + | + |
| 21 | – | – | – | – | + | + | IR | IR | – | – | – | – | +/++ | +/++ | IR | IR |
| 22 | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | IR | – | – |
| Irr/All ratio | 10/3 | 11/2 | 10/2 | 10/2 | 4/10 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/4 | 8/1 | 8/1 | 8/3 | 9/2 | 4/12 | 4/12 | 8/4 | 4/8 |
| First reading | Second reading | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of reactions | 46 | Total number of reactions | 48 | |||||||||||||
| Irritative reactions visual | 26 | Irritative reactions visual | 28 | |||||||||||||
| Irritative reactions HD-OCT | 28 | Irritative reaction HD-OCT | 25 | |||||||||||||
| Allergic reactions visual | 20 | Allergic reactions visual | 20 | |||||||||||||
| Allergic reactions HD-OCT | 18 | Allergic reactions HD-OCT | 23 | |||||||||||||
| Misclassification +? → IRa | 2 | Misclassification +? → IRa | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Misclassification IR → +?b | 0 | Misclassification IR → +?b | 5 | |||||||||||||
aItalic misclassified lesions: visual (+?) → HD-OCT (IR)
bBold misclassified lesions: visual (IR) → HD-OCT (+?)
Relevant RCM features for diagnosis of ACD and ICD respectively
| RCM feature | ACD | ICD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2d° | 4d° | 2d° | 4d° | |
| Superficial epidermal changes | ||||
| Stratum corneum disruption/detached corneocytes | (−/+) | (−/+) | (+++) | (++) |
| Parakeratosis | (+/−) | (+/−) | (+++) | (++) |
| Spongiosisa of SG | (++) | (+++) | (++) | (+) |
| Spongiosis of SS | (++) | (+++) | (++) | (+) |
| Exocytosis SG | (++) | (+++) | (++) | (+++) |
| Exocytosis SS | (++) | (+++) | (++) | (+++) |
| Vesicle formationb SG | (++) | (+++) | (+) | (+) |
| Vesicle formation SS | (++) | (+++) | (+) | (+) |
| Necrosis | (+) | (+) | (+++) | (+++) |
| Increased epidermal thickness | (−/+) | (+) | (++) | (+++) |
| Basal layer brightness | (−/+) | (−/+) | (++) | (+) |
| Blood vessel dilatation | (+) | (++) | (+) | (+) |
| Superficial dermal inflammatory infiltratec | (+) | (++) | (+) | (++) |
Parakeratotic changes are seen as highly reflective polygonal cells at the level of SC with a central dark or bright nucleus
Intradermal necrosis seen as circumscribed dark spaces with irregular borders with detached KC
d°days after patch test placing
aDepending on the severity of the clinical reaction: mild, moderate or marked spongiosis
bVesicle formation may be microfocal, diffuse or widespread
cInflammatory infiltrate either as aggregates or as single cells
Fig. 1Epidermal thickness (ET) measurement procedure by High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography 3-D imaging: (a) Cross-sectional (CS) mode and (b) En-face (EF) mode. Each voxel of the 3-D HD-OCT imaging is defined by a unique set of x, y, z coordinates. (1) First the basal cell layer at the suprapapillary plate will be searched for in the EF mode at the cross of green and red line (yellow arrow “1”). (2) The exact position of the basal cell layer in the CS mode can be determined at the cross of green and blue line (yellow arrow “2”). (3) Stratum corneum is defined as a hyporeflective “band” limited by two thin hyperreflective lines (red arrows). The upper one corresponds with the entrance signal and the lower one corresponds with an interference signal due to the difference in refraction indices between stratum corneum and stratum granulosum. If stratum corneum is thin both hyperreflective lines merge to become one thicker line (yellow arrow “3”). (4) Epidermal thickness is then measured between this thicker line and the blue line by using the measurement toolbar of the Skintell(R)program (yellow arrow “4” pointing to the yellow accolade)
Fig. 4Visual patch test scoring and corresponding cross-sectional and EF (at different Z-values) HD-OCT images of Ni (II) allergic reaction graded (+) 48 h after patch application. Spongiosis and dermal edema is more severe compared to +? reactions. Intraepidermal visicle formation is observed. Due to dermal edema the visualization of dilated blood vessels and superficial dermal inflammatory infiltrate is lesser. Z-values = depth in µm of the en-face image
Fig. 5Visual patch test scoring and corresponding CS and EF (at different Z-values) HD-OCT images of Cr(VI) allergic reaction graded (++) 48 h after patch application. The more severe the reaction the more intense the spongiosis (yellow circle), vesicle formation (yellow arrow) and exocytosis (red circle). The more severe the dermal edema the lesser the blood vessel dilatation and superficial dermal inflammatory infiltrate could be perceived. Z-values = depth in µm of the en-face image