Literature DB >> 25185888

Increase in the pharmacological management of Type 2 diabetes with pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.

N Gallagher1, C Cardwell, C Hughes, D O'Reilly.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether the financial incentives for tight glycaemic control, introduced in the UK as part of a pay-for-performance scheme in 2004, increased the rate at which people with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes were started on anti-diabetic medication.
METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the General Practice Research Database for the years 1999-2008 was performed using an interrupted time series analysis of the treatment patterns for people newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes (n = 21 197).
RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of people with newly diagnosed diabetes managed without medication 12 months after diagnosis was 47% and after 24 months it was 40%. The annual rate of initiation of pharmacological treatment within 12 months of diagnosis was decreasing before the introduction of the pay-for-performance scheme by 1.2% per year (95% CI -2.0, -0.5%) and increased after the introduction of the scheme by 1.9% per year (95% CI 1.1, 2.7%). The equivalent figures for treatment within 24 months of diagnosis were -1.4% (95% CI -2.1, -0.8%) before the scheme was introduced and 1.6% (95% CI 0.8, 2.3%) after the scheme was introduced.
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the introduction of financial incentives in 2004 has effected a change in the management of people newly diagnosed with diabetes. We conclude that a greater proportion of people with newly diagnosed diabetes are being initiated on medication within 1 and 2 years of diagnosis as a result of the introduction of financial incentives for tight glycaemic control.
© 2014 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2014 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25185888     DOI: 10.1111/dme.12575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Nishchay Mehta; Anne Schilder; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.

Authors:  Liying Jia; Qingyue Meng; Anthony Scott; Beibei Yuan; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-20

3.  Basal-bolus Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the UK: Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and the Effect of Switching to Premixed Insulin.

Authors:  Kate van Brunt; Bradley Curtis; Tibor Ivanyi; Elemer Balogh; Corina Chalkiadaki; Sharon MacLachlan; David Neasham; Mireia Raluy-Callado
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 4.  The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay Jl Forbes; Catherine Marchand; Tim Doran; Stephen Peckham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  F P Vlaanderen; M A Tanke; B R Bloem; M J Faber; F Eijkenaar; F T Schut; P P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-05

6.  Pay-for-performance programmes reduce stroke risks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Chien-Wen Chou; Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Yu Chou; Wen-Chen Tsai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Celestin Hategeka; Hinda Ruton; Mohammad Karamouzian; Larry D Lynd; Michael R Law
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.