Literature DB >> 25185616

Colpocleisis: a safe, minimally invasive option for pelvic organ prolapse.

Margaret G Mueller1, Chandy Ellimootil, Melinda G Abernethy, Elizabeth R Mueller, Samuel Hohmann, Kimberly Kenton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the morbidity and mortality associated with colpocleisis and factors associated with improved outcomes.
METHODS: We used University HealthSystem Consortium database, which included inpatient data from US hospitals. We included all women who underwent colpocleisis from 2002 to 2012. Centers were categorized geographically and by annual case volume. Cases were grouped by age and provider specialty. Outcome and readmission data from participating hospitals were compared between groups by analysis of variance and Tukey statistics. Average length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, complication rate, mortality rate, and readmission rate were calculated for each hospital and compared.
RESULTS: Colpocleisis procedures (4776) were performed at 145 US medical centers. Forty-three percent of procedures were done on women older than 80 years, 52% on women 60 to 79 years, 3% on women 40 to 59 years, and 0.9% on women 20 to 39 years. Overall, rates of complications, ICU admission, and mortality were low with average rates of 6.82%, 2.80%, and 0.15%, respectively. High-volume centers had lower ICU admission and complications rates as well as a shorter LOS. Younger women had higher ICU admission and complication rates as well longer LOS. Stratification by provider specialty demonstrated higher ICU admission rates among cases performed by urologists as compared to cases performed by urogynecologists and general obstetrician-gynecologists. Complication rates were also higher among obstetrician-gynecologists and urologists as compared to urogynecologists. Length of stay was significantly longer when colpocleisis was performed by urologists rather than a urogynecologists.
CONCLUSIONS: Colpocleisis is a safe minimally invasive procedure and outcomes are influenced by provider specialty and hospital volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25185616     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  11 in total

1.  Management of pyometra after LeFort colpocleisis resistant to drainage.

Authors:  Cenk Yasa; Funda Gungor Ugurlucan; Onay Yalcin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Alix Leader-Cramer; Margaret Mueller; Bhumy Davé; Alexandria Alverdy; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Hysterectomy at the time of colpocleisis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Keisha A Jones; Yueran Zhuo; Senay Solak; Oz Harmanli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Risk factors predicting the loss of functional independence after obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Logan Blankenship; Meadow M Good; Carmen Smotherman; Shiva Gautam; Ruchira Singh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair.

Authors:  Andrea Braga; Maurizio Serati; Stefano Salvatore; Marco Torella; Roberto Pasqualetti; Andrea Papadia; Giorgio Caccia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A case of pelvic organ prolapse in the setting of cirrhotic ascites.

Authors:  Nima M Shah; Natasha Ginzburg; Kristene Whitmore
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

9.  Obliterative Versus Reconstructive Prolapse Repair for Women Older than 70: Is There an Optimal Approach?

Authors:  Sybil G Dessie; Alex Shapiro; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Eman A Elkadry
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Razor-type dermatomes enable quick and thin vaginal dissection with less bleeding in colpocleisis.

Authors:  Kumiko Kato; Yuji Hayashi; Mami Adachi; Ryota Ando; Hideji Kawanishi; Hirotaka Matsui; Takashi Kato; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Shoji Suzuki; Ryohei Hattori
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.