OBJECTIVE: The current study investigates the extent to which a refundable tax credit could be used to increase low-income children's after-school physical activity levels. METHODS: An experimental study was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention offering a simulated refundable tax credit to parents of elementary-school-age children (n = 130) for enrollment in after-school physical activity programs. A randomized controlled design was used, with data collected at baseline, immediately following the 4-month intervention (postintervention), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up). Evaluation measures included (1) enrollment rate, time spent, weekly participation frequency, duration of enrollment, and long-term enrollment patterns in after-school physical activity programs and (2) moderate to vigorous physical activity. RESULTS: The simulated tax credits did not significantly influence low-income children's rates of enrollment in after-school physical activity programs, frequency of participation, time spent in after-school physical activity programs, and overall moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity at postintervention or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of refundable tax credits as incentives to increase participation in after-school physical activity programs in low-income families may have limited effectiveness. Lawmakers might consider other methods of fiscal policy to promote physical activity such as direct payment to after-school physical activity program providers for enrolling and serving a low-income child in a qualified program, or improvements to programming and infrastructure.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The current study investigates the extent to which a refundable tax credit could be used to increase low-income children's after-school physical activity levels. METHODS: An experimental study was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention offering a simulated refundable tax credit to parents of elementary-school-age children (n = 130) for enrollment in after-school physical activity programs. A randomized controlled design was used, with data collected at baseline, immediately following the 4-month intervention (postintervention), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up). Evaluation measures included (1) enrollment rate, time spent, weekly participation frequency, duration of enrollment, and long-term enrollment patterns in after-school physical activity programs and (2) moderate to vigorous physical activity. RESULTS: The simulated tax credits did not significantly influence low-income children's rates of enrollment in after-school physical activity programs, frequency of participation, time spent in after-school physical activity programs, and overall moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity at postintervention or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of refundable tax credits as incentives to increase participation in after-school physical activity programs in low-income families may have limited effectiveness. Lawmakers might consider other methods of fiscal policy to promote physical activity such as direct payment to after-school physical activity program providers for enrolling and serving a low-income child in a qualified program, or improvements to programming and infrastructure.
Authors: Victor R Vieweg; Christopher H Johnston; Jack O Lanier; Antony Fernandez; Anand K Pandurangi Journal: South Med J Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: John C Spence; Nicholas L Holt; Christopher J Sprysak; Nancy Spencer-Cavaliere; Timothy Caulfield Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2012 May-Jun
Authors: Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Bridget C Foley; Katherine B Owen; Adrian E Bauman; William Bellew; Lindsey J Reece Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295