| Literature DB >> 25183992 |
Toshio Doi1, Yoshihiro Matsumoto2, Osamu Tono1, Kiyoshi Tarukado1, Katsumi Harimaya2, Seiji Okada2, Kensuke Kubota2, Mitsumasa Hayashida2, Yukihide Iwamoto2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right thoracic curvature, rib cage deformities and aortic left shift are features of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis that are correlated with each other. We recently reported that disturbance of ribcage development results in progressive thoracic scoliosis in mice. Recently, it has been confirmed that the normal spine exhibits right thoracic curvature and rib cage deformities and that these deformities worsen during the adolescent period. The purpose of this study was to examine whether rib cage deformities correlate with thoracic side curvature in the normal spine, as observed in scoliosis, which is important basic knowledge needed to elucidate the causative factors of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Entities:
Keywords: Aorta; Rib cage deformity; Scoliosis; Shallow chest
Year: 2014 PMID: 25183992 PMCID: PMC4152277 DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scoliosis ISSN: 1748-7161
The background diseases in the patients
| Malignant disease | 59 |
| Collagen disease | 20 |
| Inflammatory disease | 17 |
| Infection | 13 |
| Benign tumor | 11 |
| Renal disease | 10 |
| Hepatitis | 6 |
| Gynecological disease | 2 |
| Pneumonia | 2 |
| Trauma | 2 |
| Meningitis | 1 |
| Hip necrosis | 1 |
| Labyrinthine syndrome | 1 |
| Headache | 1 |
| Spinocerebellar degeneration | 1 |
| Asthma | 1 |
| Total | 148 |
Figure 1CT image measurement. The anteroposterior chest dimension (d), aortic location, whether a positive value was found on the anterior-right side (a) and the ribcage rotation angle (∠θ) were measured on CT images. Rightward ribcage rotation was defined as positive.
Figure 2Right thoracic curvature in the normal spine. To evaluate the thoracic side curvature in the normal spine, Cobb’s angles were measured from T5 to T12 using standing chest radiographs. Right-sided curvature was given a positive value. The mean thoracic side curvature was 3.0 ± 3.0 (mean ± SD).
Figure 3Correlation between the anteroposterior chest dimension and aortic position. There was a statistically significant correlation between the anteroposterior chest dimension and aortic position (ρ = 0.527, p < 0.0001, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient).
Figure 4Correlation between the aortic position and ribcage rotation angle. There was a statistically significant correlation between the aortic position and ribcage rotation angle (ρ = -0.283, p = 0.0005, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient).
Figure 5Correlation between the ribcage rotation angle and the thoracic side curvature. There was a statistically significant correlation between the ribcage rotation angle and thoracic side curvature (ρ = 0.175, p = 0.033, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient).