Literature DB >> 25183603

An anatomical study of the entry point in the greater trochanter for intramedullary nailing.

K Farhang1, R Desai1, J H Wilber1, D R Cooperman2, R W Liu3.   

Abstract

Malpositioning of the trochanteric entry point during the introduction of an intramedullary nail may cause iatrogenic fracture or malreduction. Although the optimal point of insertion in the coronal plane has been well described, positioning in the sagittal plane is poorly defined. The paired femora from 374 cadavers were placed both in the anatomical position and in internal rotation to neutralise femoral anteversion. A marker was placed at the apparent apex of the greater trochanter, and the lateral and anterior offsets from the axis of the femoral shaft were measured on anteroposterior and lateral photographs. Greater trochanteric morphology and trochanteric overhang were graded. The mean anterior offset of the apex of the trochanter relative to the axis of the femoral shaft was 5.1 mm (sd 4.0) and 4.6 mm (sd 4.2) for the anatomical and neutralised positions, respectively. The mean lateral offset of the apex was 7.1 mm (sd 4.6) and 6.4 mm (sd 4.6), respectively. Placement of the entry position at the apex of the greater trochanter in the anteroposterior view does not reliably centre an intramedullary nail in the sagittal plane. Based on our findings, the site of insertion should be about 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter to allow for its anterior offset. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femur iatrogenic fracture; Femur malunion; Greater trochanter; Greater trochanter anatomy; Intramedullary nailing; Trochanteric nail stating point

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183603     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.34314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang.

Authors:  John V Horberg; David C Tapscott; Brian P Kurcz; Ryan J O'Rourke; Timothy A Mikesell; Trevor M Owen; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-22

2.  Is clinical measurement of anatomic axis of the femur adequate?

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Influence of different great trochanteric entry points on the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shuo Pan; Xiao-Hui Liu; Tao Feng; Hui-Jun Kang; Zhi-Guang Tian; Chun-Guang Lou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Kwang-Soon Song; Chang-Jin Yon; Yu-Ran Heo; Jae-Ho Lee; Seung-Bo Lee; Yeon-Kyoung Ko; Kyung-Jae Lee; Si-Wook Lee
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  Correlation between lag screw route and the ideal insertion point of the intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Junya Yoshitani; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Takaaki Ohmori; Ken Ueoka; Yuki Yamamuro; Atsushi Taninaka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points.

Authors:  Sharan Mallya; Surendra U Kamath; Rajendra Annappa; Nithin Elliot Nazareth; Krithika Kamath; Pragya Tyagi
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.