Literature DB >> 25183585

Evaluation of the magnitude and location of Cam deformity using three dimensional CT analysis.

O Khan1, J Witt1.   

Abstract

The cam-type deformity in femoroacetabular impingement is a 3D deformity. Single measurements using radiographs, CT or MRI may not provide a true estimate of the magnitude of the deformity. We performed an analysis of the size and location of measurements of the alpha angle (α°) using a CT technique which could be applied to the 3D reconstructions of the hip. Analysis was undertaken in 42 patients (57 hips; 24 men and 18 women; mean age 38 years (16 to 58)) who had symptoms of femoroacetabular impingement related to a cam-type abnormality. An α° of > 50° was considered a significant indicator of cam-type impingement. Measurements of the α° were made at different points around the femoral head/neck junction at intervals of 30°: starting at the nine o'clock (posterior), ten, eleven and twelve o'clock (superior), one, two and ending at three o'clock (anterior) position. The mean maximum increased α° was 64.6° (50.8° to 86°). The two o'clock position was the most common point to find an increased α° (53 hips; 93%), followed by one o'clock (48 hips; 84%). The largest α° for each hip was found most frequently at the two o'clock position (46%), followed by the one o'clock position (39%). Generally, raised α angles extend over three segments of the clock face. Single measurements of the α°, whether pre- or post-operative, should be viewed with caution as they may not be representative of the true size of the deformity and not define whether adequate correction has been achieved following surgery. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha angle; CT; Femoroacetabular impingement; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183585     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.33555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights: Subject-specific patterns of femur-labrum contact are complex and vary in asymptomatic hips and hips with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Jonathan H Rylander
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Low-Dose Computed Tomography Reduces Radiation Exposure by 90% Compared With Traditional Computed Tomography Among Patients Undergoing Hip-Preservation Surgery.

Authors:  Alvin W Su; Travis J Hillen; Eric P Eutsler; Asheesh Bedi; James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Derrick M Knapik; Martina Guidetti; Alejandro Espinoza; Jorge Chahla; Shane J Nho; Philip Malloy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  3D CT segmentation of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement-reliability and relationship of CAM lesion with anthropomorphic features.

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Joel E Wells; Riham Dessouky; Adam Gleason; Rajiv Chopra; Yonatan Chatzinoff; Nicholas P Fey; Yin Xi; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.