Literature DB >> 25183583

Dilemmas in imaging for peri-acetabular osteotomy: the influence of patient position and imaging technique on the radiological features of hip dysplasia.

D Kosuge1, T Cordier1, L B Solomon1, D W Howie1.   

Abstract

Peri-acetabular osteotomy is an established surgical treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in young adults. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis is commonly used to assess the extent of dysplasia as well as to assess post-operative correction. Radiological prognostic factors include the lateral centre-edge angle, acetabular index, extrusion index and the acetabular version. Standing causes a change in the pelvis tilt which can alter certain radiological measurements relative to the supine position. This article discusses the radiological indices used to assess dysplasia and reviews the effects of patient positioning on these indices with a focus on assessment for a peri-acetabular osteotomy. Intra-operatively, fluoroscopy is commonly used and the implications of using fluoroscopy as a modality to assess the various radiological indices along with the effects of using an anteroposterior or posteroanterior fluoroscopic view are examined. Each of these techniques gives rise to a slightly different image of the pelvis as the final image is sensitive to the position of the pelvis and the projection of the x-ray beam. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peri-acetabular osteotomy; PAO; Imaging; Pelvis tilt; Fluoroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183583     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.34269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

1.  The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.

Authors:  Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  James D Wylie; Mariana G Ferrer; Michael P McClincy; Patricia E Miller; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Daud Tai Shan Chou; Lucian Bogdan Solomon; Kerry Costi; Susan Pannach; Oksana Tamara Holubowycz; Donald William Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Acetabular orientation in triple pelvic osteotomy: is intraoperative fluoroscopy reliable?

Authors:  Daniel Dornacher; Mirco Sgroi; Tobias Freitag; Heiko Reichel; Bernd Lutz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  The use of image analysis software increases the accuracy of the periacetabular osteotomy fragment placement.

Authors:  Alison J Dittmer Flemig; Anthony Essilfie; Brandon Schneider; Stacy Robustelli; Ernest L Sink
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Jeremy A Ross; Jill A Erickson; Mike B Anderson; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Can the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index Be Used to Distinguish Dysplasia from Impingement?

Authors:  Justin T Smith; Young Jee; Erika Daley; Denise M Koueiter; Martin Beck; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effects of degree of translation or rotation of acetabular fragment of periacetabular osteotomy procedure on pelvic X-ray parameters.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; Selahattin Aydemir; R Bugra Husemoglu; Berkay Yanik; Onur Gursan; Ali Balci; Hasan Havitcioglu
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-06-28

9.  Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Allows the Reliable Assessment of Deformity Correction during Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Johannes Christian Reichert; André Hofer; Georg Matziolis; Georgi Iwan Wassilew
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.