Literature DB >> 25183385

A new paper and pencil task reveals adult false belief reasoning bias.

Patricia I Coburn1, Daniel M Bernstein, Sander Begeer.   

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) is the ability to take other people's perspective by inferring their mental state. Most 6-year olds pass the change-of-location false belief task that is commonly used to assess ToM. However, the change-of-location task is not suitable for individuals over 5 years of age, due to its discrete response options. In two experiments, we used a paper and pencil version of a modified change-of-location task (the Real Object Sandbox task) to assess false belief reasoning continuously rather than discretely in adults. Participants heard nine change-of-location scenarios and answered a critical question after each. The memory control questions only required the participant to remember the object's original location, whereas the false belief questions required participants to take the perspective of the protagonist. Participants were more accurate on memory trials than trials requiring perspective taking, and performance on paper and pencil trials correlated with corresponding trials on the Real Object Sandbox task. The Paper and Pencil Sandbox task is a convenient continuous measure of ToM that could be administered to a wide range of age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183385     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0606-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  26 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross; J Watson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks.

Authors:  Ella Brent; Patricia Rios; Francesca Happé; Tony Charman
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2004-09

3.  The decline of theory of mind in old age is (partly) mediated by developmental changes in domain-general abilities.

Authors:  Hannes Rakoczy; Antje Harder-Kasten; Lioba Sturm
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-05-20

Review 4.  A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind.

Authors:  Julie D Henry; Louise H Phillips; Ted Ruffman; Phoebe E Bailey
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

5.  Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Edgar Erdfelder; Andrew N Meltzoff; William Peria; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs.

Authors:  Susan A J Birch; Paul Bloom
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-05

7.  Rethinking theory of mind in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Anke M Scheeren; Marc de Rosnay; Hans M Koot; Sander Begeer
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults.

Authors:  F G Happé
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1994-04

9.  A second look at second-order belief attribution in autism.

Authors:  H Tager-Flusberg; K Sullivan
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1994-10

10.  Beliefs about thought probability: evidence for persistent errors in mindreading and links to executive control.

Authors:  Kristin Hansen Lagattuta; Liat Sayfan; Christina Harvey
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.