Literature DB >> 25183323

Gender and age related differences in foot morphology.

Daniele Tomassoni1, Enea Traini2, Francesco Amenta3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study has assessed age-related changes of foot morphology for developing appropriate footwear with particular reference to the elderly.
METHODS: Anatomical parameters such as foot length, circumference and height and ankle length, circumference and height were assessed in a sample of males (n=577) and females (n=528) divided into three age groups. The groups included young-adult, aged between 20 and 25 years; adult, aged between 35 and 55 years; and old, aged between 65 and 70 years individuals.
RESULTS: In terms of gender differences, in young-adult individuals the sex-related morphological differences observed, are just related to a significantly lower length of foot in females. In adult subjects morphological parameters investigated were significantly lower in females even after normalization for foot length. In old individuals, no differences of the parameters were found after normalization for foot length. Comparative analysis of morphometric data between young-adult and adult individuals revealed that the instep length was smaller in adults. The opposite was observed for the great toe and medial foot arch height. Length of ankle was higher in adult than in young-adult individuals, whereas ankle circumference and height were smaller. In old vs adult individuals foot circumference showed the most relevant age-related differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Feet anatomy presents specific characteristics in different ages of life. The ideal footwear should take into account these characteristics. This is true primarily for the elderly for minimizing the risk of falls or of other problems related to inappropriate footwear.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-dependent changes; Elderly; Foot anatomy; Footwear; Quantitative morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183323     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

1.  Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner.

Authors:  Mahshid Saghazadeh; Naruki Kitano; Tomohiro Okura
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Evaluation of the relationship between the static measurement of transverse arch flexibility of the forefoot and gait parameters in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Takashi Kondo; Takeshi Muneta; Tsutomu Fukui
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-03-22

3.  A data-driven classification of 3D foot types by archetypal shapes based on landmarks.

Authors:  Aleix Alcacer; Irene Epifanio; M Victoria Ibáñez; Amelia Simó; Alfredo Ballester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Paediatric flat foot and foot dimension in Central Anatolia.

Authors:  Serap Alsancak; Senem Guner; Enver Güven; Ali Koray Özgün; Yunis Akkaş; Neslihan Alkıs
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Determinants of footwear difficulties in people with plantar heel pain.

Authors:  Justin Sullivan; Evangelos Pappas; Roger Adams; Jack Crosbie; Joshua Burns
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Kristina Stanković; Brian G Booth; Femke Danckaers; Fien Burg; Philippe Vermaelen; Saartje Duerinck; Jan Sijbers; Toon Huysmans
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Foot Morphology in Chinese School Children Varies by Sex and Age.

Authors:  Miaomiao Xu; Youlian Hong; Jing Xian Li; Lin Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.