Literature DB >> 25183209

Efficacy and safety of early parenteral anticoagulation as a bridge to warfarin after mechanical valve replacement.

J G Mathew, A C Spyropoulos, A Yusuf, J Vincent, J Eikelboom, O Shestakovska, S Fremes, J Noora, L Guo, M Peterson, M Pai, R Whitlock1.   

Abstract

Limited evidence exists to guide the use of early parenteral anticoagulation following mechanical heart valve replacement (MVR). The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day rates of thrombotic and bleeding complications for MVR patients receiving therapeutic versus prophylactic dose bridging regimens. In this retrospective cohort study we reviewed anticoagulation management and outcomes of all patients undergoing MVR at five Canadian hospitals between 2003 and 2010. The primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolism (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, systemic embolism or valve thrombosis) and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding at 30-days. Outcomes were compared using a logistic regression model adjusting for propensity score and in a 1:1 propensity matched sample. A total of 1777 patients underwent mechanical valve replacement, of whom 923 received therapeutic dose bridging anticoagulation and 764 received prophylactic dose bridging postoperatively. Sixteen patients (1.8 %) who received therapeutic dose bridging and fifteen patients (2.1 %) who received prophylactic dose bridging experienced the primary efficacy outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 2.18, p=0.81). Forty-eight patients (5.4 %) in the therapeutic dosing group and 14 patients (1.9 %) in the prophylactic dosing group experienced the primary safety outcome of major bleeding (OR 3.23; 95 % CI, 1.58 to 6.62; p=0.001). The direction of the effects, their magnitude and significance were maintained in the propensity matched analysis. In conclusion, we found that early after mechanical valve replacement, therapeutic dose bridging was associated with a similar risk of thromboembolic complications, but a 2.5 to 3-fold increased risk of major bleeding compared with prophylactic dose bridging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; anticoagulants; heparin; thromboembolism; valvular heart diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183209     DOI: 10.1160/TH14-03-0284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  5 in total

1.  Perioperative consultative hematology: can you clear my patient for a procedure?

Authors:  Allison Elaine Burnett; Bishoy Ragheb; Scott Kaatz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Low molecular weight heparin in surgical valve procedures: When and how much for an optimal prophylaxis?

Authors:  Katarzyna Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz; Marek Cisowski; Andrzej Bochenek; Piotr Buszman; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Kunik; Magdalena Mularska; Krzysztof Kocot; Piotr Politowski; Jakub Brączkowski; Agata Trznadel; Michael S Aboodi; Paweł Buszman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Promotion of adhesion and proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells on decellularized valves by covalent incorporation of RGD peptide and VEGF.

Authors:  Jianliang Zhou; Jingli Ding; Bin'en Nie; Shidong Hu; Zhigang Zhu; Jia Chen; Jianjun Xu; Jiawei Shi; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapies Using Enoxaparin.

Authors:  Hun Gyu Hwang; So My Koo; Soo Taek Uh; Yang Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  A meta-analysis of bridging anticoagulation between low molecular weight heparin and heparin.

Authors:  Ende Tao; Yun Long Luo; Zhe Tao; Li Wan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.