Literature DB >> 25182777

Young but not relatively old retrotransposons are preferentially located in gene-rich euchromatic regions in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants.

Yingxiu Xu1, Jianchang Du.   

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are the major DNA components of flowering plants. They are generally enriched in pericentromeric heterochromatin regions of their host genomes, which could result from the preferential insertion of LTR retrotransposons and the low effectiveness of purifying selection in these regions. To estimate the relative importance of the actions of these two factors on their distribution pattern, the LTR retrotransposons in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) plants were characterized at the genome level, and then the distribution of young elements was compared with that of relatively old elements. The current data show that old elements are mainly located in recombination-suppressed heterochromatin regions, and that young elements are preferentially located in the gene-rich euchromatic regions. Further analysis showed a negative correlation between the insertion time of LTR retrotransposons and the recombination rate. The data also showed there to be more solo LTRs in genic regions than in intergenic regions or in regions close to genes. These observations indicate that, unlike in many other plant genomes, the current LTR retrotransposons in tomatoes have a tendency to be preferentially located into euchromatic regions, probably caused by their severe suppression of activities in heterochromatic regions. These elements are apt to be maintained in heterochromatin regions, probably as a consequence of the pericentromeric effect in tomatoes. These results also indicate that local recombination rates and intensities of purifying selection in different genomic regions are largely responsible for structural variation and non-random distribution of LTR retrotransposons in tomato plants.
© 2014 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  purifying selection; recombination; retrotransposon; targeting specificity; tomato

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182777     DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  15 in total

1.  Diversity, distribution and dynamics of full-length Copia and Gypsy LTR retroelements in Solanum lycopersicum.

Authors:  Rosalía Cristina Paz; Melisa Eliana Kozaczek; Hernán Guillermo Rosli; Natalia Pilar Andino; Maria Virginia Sanchez-Puerta
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Chromosomal distribution of soybean retrotransposon SORE-1 suggests its recent preferential insertion into euchromatic regions.

Authors:  Kenta Nakashima; Jun Abe; Akira Kanazawa
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  The population genetic structure approach adds new insights into the evolution of plant LTR retrotransposon lineages.

Authors:  Vanessa Fuentes Suguiyama; Luiz Augusto Baciega Vasconcelos; Maria Magdalena Rossi; Cibele Biondo; Nathalia de Setta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Profiling of Accessible Chromatin Regions across Multiple Plant Species and Cell Types Reveals Common Gene Regulatory Principles and New Control Modules.

Authors:  Kelsey A Maher; Marko Bajic; Kaisa Kajala; Mauricio Reynoso; Germain Pauluzzi; Donnelly A West; Kristina Zumstein; Margaret Woodhouse; Kerry Bubb; Michael W Dorrity; Christine Queitsch; Julia Bailey-Serres; Neelima Sinha; Siobhan M Brady; Roger B Deal
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Authors:  Paola Gaiero; Magdalena Vaio; Sander A Peters; M Eric Schranz; Hans de Jong; Pablo R Speranza
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Full-length LTR retroelements in Capsicum annuum revealed a few species-specific family bursts with insertional preferences.

Authors:  Anahí Mara Yañez-Santos; Rosalía Cristina Paz; Paula Beatriz Paz-Sepúlveda; Juan Domingo Urdampilleta
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Genome-wide characterization of non-reference transposable element insertion polymorphisms reveals genetic diversity in tropical and temperate maize.

Authors:  Xianjun Lai; James C Schnable; Zhengqiao Liao; Jie Xu; Gengyun Zhang; Chuan Li; Erliang Hu; Tingzhao Rong; Yunbi Xu; Yanli Lu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Characterization, Genomic Organization, Abundance, and Chromosomal Distribution of Ty1-copia Retrotransposons in Erianthus arundinaceus.

Authors:  Yongji Huang; Ling Luo; Xuguang Hu; Fan Yu; Yongqing Yang; Zuhu Deng; Jiayun Wu; Rukai Chen; Muqing Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Transcriptionally active LTR retrotransposons in Eucalyptus genus are differentially expressed and insertionally polymorphic.

Authors:  Helena Sanches Marcon; Douglas Silva Domingues; Juliana Costa Silva; Rafael Junqueira Borges; Fábio Filippi Matioli; Marcos Roberto de Mattos Fontes; Celso Luis Marino
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Genome-wide Annotation and Comparative Analysis of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons between Pear Species of P. bretschneideri and P. Communis.

Authors:  Hao Yin; Jianchang Du; Jun Wu; Shuwei Wei; Yingxiu Xu; Shutian Tao; Juyou Wu; Shaoling Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.