Literature DB >> 25182714

A controlled community-based trial to promote smoke-free policy in rural communities.

Ellen J Hahn1, Mary Kay Rayens, Sarah Adkins, Kathy Begley, Nancy York.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rural, tobacco-growing areas are disproportionately affected by tobacco use, secondhand smoke, and weak tobacco control policies. The purpose was to test the effects of a stage-specific, tailored policy-focused intervention on readiness for smoke-free policy, and policy outcomes in rural underserved communities.
METHODS: A controlled community-based trial including 37 rural counties. Data were collected annually with community advocates (n = 330) and elected officials (n = 158) in 19 intervention counties and 18 comparison counties over 5 years (average response rate = 68%). Intervention communities received policy development strategies from community advisors tailored to their stage of readiness and designed to build capacity, build demand, and translate and disseminate science. Policy outcomes were tracked over 5 years.
FINDINGS: Communities receiving the stage-specific, tailored intervention had higher overall community readiness scores and better policy outcomes than the comparison counties, controlling for county-level smoking rate, population size, and education. Nearly one-third of the intervention counties adopted smoke-free laws covering restaurants, bars, and all workplaces compared to none of the comparison counties.
CONCLUSIONS: The stage-specific, tailored policy-focused intervention acted as a value-added resource to local smoke-free campaigns by promoting readiness for policy, as well as actual policy change in rural communities. Although actual policy change and percent covered by the policies were modest, these areas need additional resources and efforts to build capacity, build demand, and translate and disseminate science in order to accelerate smoke-free policy change and reduce the enormous toll from tobacco in these high-risk communities.
© 2014 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health disparities; health promotion; policy; tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182714     DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

1.  Recall and Effectiveness of Messages Promoting Smoke-Free Policies in Rural Communities.

Authors:  Mary Kay Rayens; Karen M Butler; Amanda T Wiggins; Ganna Kostygina; Ronald E Langley; Ellen J Hahn
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Key Factors Inhibiting Legislative Progress Toward Smoke-Free Coverage in Appalachia.

Authors:  J Travis Donahoe; Andrea R Titus; Nancy L Fleischer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  PhenX: Environment measures for Tobacco Regulatory Research.

Authors:  Jennifer B Unger; Frank J Chaloupka; Donna Vallone; James F Thrasher; Destiney S Nettles; Tabitha P Hendershot; Gary E Swan
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  A Social-Ecological Review of Cancer Disparities in Kentucky.

Authors:  Sharon D Rodriguez; Nathan L Vanderford; Bin Huang; Robin C Vanderpool
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Rural-urban disparities in tobacco retail access in the southeastern United States: CVS vs. the dollar stores.

Authors:  Jaclyn Hall; Hee Deok Cho; Mildred Maldonado-Molina; Thomas J George; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Ramzi G Salloum
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-07-02

6.  Disparities in Rural Tobacco Use, Smoke-Free Policies, and Tobacco Taxes.

Authors:  Kelly Buettner-Schmidt; Donald R Miller; Brody Maack
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 1.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.