Literature DB >> 25182363

High-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of prostate cancer at 3 T.

X Wang1, Y Qian1, B Liu1, L Cao2, Y Fan3, J J Zhang1, Y Yu4.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare tumour visibility on diffusion-weighted (DW) images and the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps obtained using b-values of 1000, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were retrospectively included in the study. DWI was examined under different pairs of b-values (b = 0, 1000 s/mm(2); 0, 1500 s/mm(2); and 0, 2000 s/mm(2)) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated with a mono-exponential fitting. The tumour-to-normal tissue [in the peripheral gland and transitional gland, peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland] contrast ratio (CR) and prostate tumour signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between different b-value DWI images. ADC was measured and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were calculated.
RESULTS: The CR of the tumour-to-PZ/central gland was significantly higher in the b = 1500 s/mm(2) images than in images created using other b-values (both p < 0.01). The tumour SNR was statistically significantly higher in b = 1500 s/mm(2) images than in the other b-value images (p < 0.01), and was significantly higher in b = 1000 s/mm(2) images than in images created at b = 2000 s/mm(2) (p = 0.035). The Az for b = 1500 s/mm(2) was significantly higher than the Az for b = 2000 s/mm(2) in the PZ (p = 0.016) and central gland (p = 0.037), and higher than the Az for b = 1000 s/mm(2), but not reach statistical significance in the PZ (p = 0.16) and in the central gland (p = 0.23).
CONCLUSION: At 3 T MRI, DWI images and ADC maps using b = 1500 s/mm(2) should be considered more effective than those at b = 2000 s/mm(2) or b = 1000 s/mm(2) for detecting prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2014 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182363     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

1.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Biparametric MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Eugenio Martorana; Corrado Maria Malaspina; Maria Cristina Aisa; Maria Napoletano; Emanuele Orlandi; Valeria Rondoni; Pietro Scialpi; Diamante Pacchiarini; Diego Palladino; Michele Dragone; Giancarlo Di Renzo; Annalisa Simeone; Giampaolo Bianchi; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm-2.

Authors:  Mi-Ri Kwon; Chan Kyo Kim; Jae-Hun Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  ECR 2015 Book of Abstracts - D - Satellite Symposia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-03

6.  False positive and false negative diagnoses of prostate cancer at multi-parametric prostate MRI in active surveillance.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Quon; Bardia Moosavi; Maneesh Khanna; Trevor A Flood; Christopher S Lim; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-05-23

7.  A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Hakozaki; Hisashi Matsushima; Jimpei Kumagai; Taro Murata; Tomoko Masuda; Yoko Hirai; Mai Oda; Nobuo Kawauchi; Munehiro Yokoyama; Yukio Homma
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion- and T2-weighted imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom J Syer; Keith C Godley; Donnie Cameron; Paul N Malcolm
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-07

Review 9.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate-a basic tutorial.

Authors:  Miguel C Cabarrus; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.