Literature DB >> 25181570

The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.

Dean F Sittig1, Joan S Ash, Hardeep Singh.   

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have potential to improve quality and safety of healthcare. However, EHR users have experienced safety concerns from EHR design and usability features that are not optimally adapted for the complex work flow of real-world practice. Few strategies exist to address unintended consequences from implementation of EHRs and other health information technologies. We propose that organizations equipped with EHRs should consider the strategy of "proactive risk assessment" of their EHR-enabled healthcare system to identify and address EHR-related safety concerns. In this paper, we describe the conceptual underpinning of an EHR-related self-assessment strategy to provide institutions a foundation upon which they could build their safety efforts. With support from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), we used a rigorous, iterative process to develop a set of 9 self-assessment tools to optimize the safety and safe use of EHRs. These tools, referred to as the Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) guides, could be used to self-assess safety and effectiveness of EHR implementations, identify specific areas of vulnerability, and create solutions and culture change to mitigate risks. A variety of audiences could conduct these assessments, including frontline clinicians or care teams in different practices, or clinical, quality, or administrative leaders within larger institutions. The guides use a multifaceted systems-based approach to assess risk and empower organizations to work with internal or external stakeholders (eg, EHR developers) on optimizing EHR functionality and using EHRs to drive improvements in the quality and safety of healthcare.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25181570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  28 in total

1.  Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerful strategies for design and implementation.

Authors:  Jessica M Ray; Raj M Ratwani; Christine A Sinsky; Richard M Frankel; Mark W Friedberg; Seth M Powsner; David I Rosenthal; Robert M Wachter; Edward R Melnick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  National trends in safety performance of electronic health record systems in children's hospitals.

Authors:  Juan D Chaparro; David C Classen; Melissa Danforth; David C Stockwell; Christopher A Longhurst
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Cross-vendor evaluation of key user-defined clinical decision support capabilities: a scenario-based assessment of certified electronic health records with guidelines for future development.

Authors:  Allison B McCoy; Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  D F Sittig; A Wright; J Ash; H Singh
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 5.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.

Authors:  Pritma Dhillon-Chattha; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth Borycki
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Continuing Patient Care during Electronic Health Record Downtime.

Authors:  Ethan Larsen; Daniel Hoffman; Carlos Rivera; Brian M Kleiner; Christian Wernz; Raj M Ratwani
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients.

Authors:  Matthew E Nolan; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Pablo Moreno-Franco; Brian Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Testing electronic health records in the "production" environment: an essential step in the journey to a safe and effective health care system.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Skye Aaron; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Assigning responsibility to close the loop on radiology test results.

Authors:  Janice L Kwan; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.