Literature DB >> 25180960

Peak inspiratory flow is a simple means of predicting decannulation success following head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective study of fifty-six patients.

Joanne Guerlain1, Jose A S Guerrero, Bertrand Baujat, Jean L St Guily, Sophie Périé.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Temporary tracheotomies are commonly performed in head and neck cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to propose a minimum peak inspiratory flow (PIF) as a standardized simple tool for successful decannulation after surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective review between January 2011 and June 2013 in a university teaching hospital.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients after head and neck cancer surgery requiring tracheotomies were included. Decannulation failure was defined as the need to recannulate patients within 24 hours. PIF values did not influence the decisions to decannulate or recannulate. Pre- and postdecannulation PIF values, measured with a handheld PIF meter (In-Check Dial), were registered until definitive decannulation.
RESULTS: A total of 67 decannulation attempts were performed, with 47 positive and nine negative decannulations at the first attempt. Of the latter, seven were positive at the second attempt and two at the third. All patients were decannulated (mean, 6.3 days). PIF values of 40 L/min appear to be the threshold with the best sensitivity (90%) and specificity (95%) for predicting decannulation success. There was a significant difference (P < .001) between mean PIF in the positive (86 L/min) and negative (20 L/min) decannulation groups and between mean PIF values with (77 L/min) and without cannula (100 L/min).
CONCLUSIONS: PIF ≥40 L/min with cannula (>60 L/min without) using the In-Check Dial oral method is a threshold associated with decannulation success. PIF is a simple quantitative parameter for evaluating the upper airway, aiding the decision to decannulate safely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Upper airway; decannulation; head and neck cancer; peak inspiratory flow; tracheotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180960     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Standardized Endoscopic Swallowing Evaluation for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients - a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Paul Muhle; Sonja Suntrup-Krueger; Karoline Burkardt; Sriramya Lapa; Mao Ogawa; Inga Claus; Bendix Labeit; Sigrid Ahring; Stephan Oelenberg; Tobias Warnecke; Rainer Dziewas
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-10

2.  Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in the management of acute inspiratory dyspnoea.

Authors:  Emeline Drapier; Esteban Brenet; Marie-Anne Louges; Jean-Claude Merol; Marc Labrousse; Xavier Dubernard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review.

Authors:  Ratender Kumar Singh; Sai Saran; Arvind K Baronia
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-06-20

4.  Feasibility of face mask spirometry during decannulation in head and neck surgery: Prospective cohort study.

Authors:  José Antonio Sánchez-Guerrero; Maria Àngels Cebrià I Iranzo; Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues; Sophie Périé
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.729

5.  Tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Jianjun Wang; Chenxi Zhang; Bin Zhang; Haiming Guo; Bo Yang; Qing Li; Jingyi Ge; Yi Li; Guangyu Niu; Hua Gao; Hongying Jiang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.