Literature DB >> 25180757

Cross-cultural variations in big five relationships with religiosity: a sociocultural motives perspective.

Jochen E Gebauer1, Wiebke Bleidorn2, Samuel D Gosling3, Peter J Rentfrow4, Michael E Lamb4, Jeff Potter5.   

Abstract

A sociocultural motives perspective (SMP) on Big Five relationships is introduced. According to the SMP, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness elicit assimilation to sociocultural norms, Openness elicits contrast from these norms, and Extraversion and Neuroticism are independent of sociocultural assimilation and contrast. Due to sociocultural assimilation, then, relationships of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness with an outcome wax (become more positive or less negative) with that outcome's increasing sociocultural normativeness. Due to sociocultural contrast, relationships of Openness with an outcome wane (become less positive or more negative) with that outcome's increasing sociocultural normativeness. We tested the SMP using religiosity as our outcome. Study 1 included 4 cross-sectional self-report data sets across 66 countries (N = 1,129,334), 50 U.S. states (N = 1,057,342), 15 German federal states (N = 20,885), and 121 British urban areas (N = 386,315). Study 2 utilized informant-report data across 37 countries (N = 544,512). Study 3 used longitudinal data across 15 German federal states (N = 14,858). Results consistently supported the SMP. Relationships of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness with religiosity were more positive in religious sociocultural contexts than in secular contexts. Relationships of Openness with religiosity were more negative in religious sociocultural contexts than in secular contexts. At a more general level, the SMP offers theory-driven explanations for cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with their outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180757     DOI: 10.1037/a0037683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.

Authors:  Jana Uher; Irina Trofimova; William Sulis; Petra Netter; Luiz Pessoa; Michael I Posner; Mary K Rothbart; Vladimir Rusalov; Isaac T Peterson; Louis A Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Psychological entitlement predicts noncompliance with the health guidelines of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Emily M Zitek; Rachel J Schlund
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Individual Differences in Personality Moderate the Effects of Perceived Group Deprivation on Violent Extremism: Evidence From a United Kingdom Nationally Representative Survey.

Authors:  Bettina Rottweiler; Paul Gill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  The Well-Being Benefits of Person-Culture Match Are Contingent on Basic Personality Traits.

Authors:  Jochen E Gebauer; Jennifer Eck; Theresa M Entringer; Wiebke Bleidorn; Peter J Rentfrow; Jeff Potter; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.