INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding can lead from mild to immediately life-threatening clinical conditions. Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is associated with a mortality of 6-10%. Spurting and oozing bleeding are associated with major risk of failure. Hemospray™ (TC-325), a new hemostatic powder, may be useful in these cases. Aim of this study is to review the efficacy of traditional endoscopic treatment in Forrest 1a-1b ulcers and to investigate the usefulness of Hemospray in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed and articles that evaluated hemostatic efficacy and rebleeding rate with traditional endoscopic techniques related to Forrest classification were reviewed. Patients with Forrest 1a-1b ulcers were treated with Hemospray, either as monotherapy or in association with other endoscopic techniques. Primary outcome was immediate hemostasis, secondary outcomes were recurrent bleeding and adverse events related to Hemospray use. RESULTS: Analysis of literature showed that mean initial hemostasis success rate in Forrest 1a-1b ulcers was of 92.8%, and mean rebleeding rate was of 13.3%. We enrolled 13 patients treated with Hemospray. Initial hemostasis was achieved in 100% and we reported three cases of rebleeding. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Forrest 1a-1b bleeding ulcer is very difficult to treat. Hemospray appears to be an effective hemostatic therapy for these ulcers. However, additional prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding can lead from mild to immediately life-threatening clinical conditions. Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is associated with a mortality of 6-10%. Spurting and oozing bleeding are associated with major risk of failure. Hemospray™ (TC-325), a new hemostatic powder, may be useful in these cases. Aim of this study is to review the efficacy of traditional endoscopic treatment in Forrest 1a-1b ulcers and to investigate the usefulness of Hemospray in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed and articles that evaluated hemostatic efficacy and rebleeding rate with traditional endoscopic techniques related to Forrest classification were reviewed. Patients with Forrest 1a-1b ulcers were treated with Hemospray, either as monotherapy or in association with other endoscopic techniques. Primary outcome was immediate hemostasis, secondary outcomes were recurrent bleeding and adverse events related to Hemospray use. RESULTS: Analysis of literature showed that mean initial hemostasis success rate in Forrest 1a-1b ulcers was of 92.8%, and mean rebleeding rate was of 13.3%. We enrolled 13 patients treated with Hemospray. Initial hemostasis was achieved in 100% and we reported three cases of rebleeding. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Forrest 1a-1b bleeding ulcer is very difficult to treat. Hemospray appears to be an effective hemostatic therapy for these ulcers. However, additional prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Authors: Alexander F Hagel; Heinz Albrecht; Andreas Nägel; Francesco Vitali; Marcel Vetter; Christine Dauth; Markus F Neurath; Martin Raithel Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Muhammad Aziz; Simcha Weissman; Tej I Mehta; Shafae Hassan; Zubair Khan; Rawish Fatima; Yuriy Tsirlin; Ammar Hassan; Michael Sciarra; Ali Nawras; Amit Rastogi Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2020-01-20
Authors: Joseph Jy Sung; Philip Wy Chiu; Francis K L Chan; James Yw Lau; Khean-Lee Goh; Lawrence Hy Ho; Hwoon-Young Jung; Jose D Sollano; Takuji Gotoda; Nageshwar Reddy; Rajvinder Singh; Kentaro Sugano; Kai-Chun Wu; Chun-Yin Wu; David J Bjorkman; Dennis M Jensen; Ernst J Kuipers; Angel Lanas Journal: Gut Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Federica Branchi; Rolf Klingenberg-Noftz; Kristina Friedrich; Nataly Bürgel; Severin Daum; Juliane Buchkremer; Elena Sonnenberg; Michael Schumann; Christoph Treese; Hanno Tröger; Donata Lissner; Hans-Jörg Epple; Britta Siegmund; Andrea Stroux; Andreas Adler; Winfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Daniel Autenrieth; Silke Leonhardt; Andreas Fischer; Christian Jürgensen; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Bertram Wiedenmann; Oliver Möschler; Maximilian Schreiner; Mathias Z Strowski; Volkmar Hempel; Yvonne Huber; Helmut Neumann; Christian Bojarski Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.584