| Literature DB >> 25180515 |
Uttam Babu Shrestha1, Kamaljit S Bawa2.
Abstract
Climate change has already impacted ecosystems and species and substantial impacts of climate change in the future are expected. Species distribution modeling is widely used to map the current potential distribution of species as well as to model the impact of future climate change on distribution of species. Mapping current distribution is useful for conservation planning and understanding the change in distribution impacted by climate change is important for mitigation of future biodiversity losses. However, the current distribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus, a flagship species of the Himalaya with very high economic value, is unknown. Nor do we know the potential changes in suitable habitat of Chinese caterpillar fungus caused by future climate change. We used MaxEnt modeling to predict current distribution and changes in the future distributions of Chinese caterpillar fungus in three future climate change trajectories based on representative concentration pathways (RCPs: RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 6.0) in three different time periods (2030, 2050, and 2070) using species occurrence points, bioclimatic variables, and altitude. About 6.02% (8,989 km2) area of the Nepal Himalaya is suitable for Chinese caterpillar fungus habitat. Our model showed that across all future climate change trajectories over three different time periods, the area of predicted suitable habitat of Chinese caterpillar fungus would expand, with 0.11-4.87% expansion over current suitable habitat. Depending upon the representative concentration pathways, we observed both increase and decrease in average elevation of the suitable habitat range of the species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25180515 PMCID: PMC4152242 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Predicted potential distribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus under current bioclimatic conditions and location of occurrence used for modeling.
Bioclimatic variables used for modeling habitat of Chinese caterpillar fungus.
| Variables Name | Code | Data Source | Resolution |
| Altitude | Alt | STRM | 90 m |
| Annual Mean Temperature | BIO 1 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Mean Diurnal Range [Mean of monthly (Max Temperature - Min Temperature)] | BIO 2 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Isothermality (BIO 2/BIO 7) (*100) | BIO 3 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Temperature Seasonality (Standard Deviation*100) | BIO 4 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Max Temperature of Warmest Month | BIO 5 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Min Temperature of Coldest Month | BIO 6 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Temperature Annual Range (BIO 5-BIO 6) | BIO 7 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter | BIO 8 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter | BIO 9 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter | BIO 10 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter | BIO 11 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Annual Precipitation | BIO 12 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Wettest Month | BIO 13 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Driest Month | BIO 14 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation) | BIO 15 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Wettest Quarter | BIO 16 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Driest Quarter | BIO 17 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Warmest Quarter | BIO 18 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
| Precipitation of Coldest Quarter | BIO 19 | Worldclim | ∼5 km (2.5 arc min) |
Correlation matrix of altitude and bioclimatic variables.
| Code | Alt | BIO1 | BIO2 | BIO3 | BIO4 | BIO5 | BIO6 | BIO7 | BIO8 | BIO9 | BIO10 | BIO11 | BIO12 | BIO13 | BIO14 | BIO15 | BIO16 | BIO17 | BIO18 | BIO19 | LULC |
| Alt | −1.00 | −0.06 | 0.13 | 0.10 | −0.99 | −0.99 | −0.14 | −1.00 | −0.99 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −0.76 | −0.81 | 0.00 | −0.74 | −0.79 | 0.31 | −0.58 | 0.46 | 0.12 | |
| BIO1 | 0.05 | −0.14 | −0.10 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.78 | −0.28 | 0.57 | −0.44 | −0.13 | ||
| BIO2 | 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.15 | −0.08 | 0.88 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.01 | −0.20 | −0.07 | −0.51 | 0.40 | −0.10 | −0.44 | −0.27 | −0.35 | 0.18 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| BIO 4 | 0.03 | −0.21 | 0.93 | −0.07 | −0.14 | −0.05 | −0.16 | −0.35 | −0.24 | −0.32 | 0.15 | −0.27 | 0.04 | −0.52 | 0.14 | 0.17 | |||||
| BIO5 | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.76 | −0.02 | 0.73 | 0.74 | −0.24 | 0.48 | −0.38 | −0.11 | ||||||
| BIO6 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 0.65 | 0.79 | −0.20 | 0.60 | −0.37 | −0.16 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| BIO8 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.78 | −0.29 | 0.57 | −0.45 | −0.12 | |||||||||
| BIO9 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 0.69 | 0.78 | −0.26 | 0.58 | −0.41 | −0.13 | ||||||||||
| BIO10 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.79 | −0.01 | 0.74 | 0.77 | −0.28 | 0.55 | −0.43 | −0.12 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| BIO12 | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.63 | 0.99 | −0.22 | 0.92 | −0.38 | −0.16 | |||||||||||||
| BIO13 | 0.06 | 0.74 | 0.99 | −0.32 | 0.88 | −0.47 | −0.13 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| BIO16 | −0.31 | 0.90 | −0.46 | −0.14 | |||||||||||||||||
| BIO17 | −0.32 | 0.96 | −0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Unrelated variables (Correlation ≤0.80) used for the study BIO3, BIO7, BIO 11, BIO 15, BIO 18, BIO 19, LULC.
Figure 2Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar fungus.
Figure 3Response curves for the predictors of the MaxEnt Model.
Figure 4Predicted future distribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus in future climate scenarios.
Figure 5The estimated areas of the predicted distribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus.
Figure 6Change in average elevation in distribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus in three future climate scenarios.
Independent sample T-test between average altitude of current predicted distribution and future predicted distributions.
| Climate trajectories | Year | Mean | SD | P value of independent sample T-test |
| RCP2.6 | 2030 | 3921.68 | 523.03 | 0.302 |
| RCP2.6 | 2050 | 3933.59 | 523.11 | 0.500 |
| RCP2.6 | 2070 | 3998.86 | 529.83 | 0.104 |
| RCP4.5 | 2030 | 3948.13 | 486.09 | 0.861 |
| RCP4.5 | 2050 | 3955.49 | 566.19 | 0.938 |
| RCP4.5 | 2070 | 3878.31 | 525.48 | 0.011 |
| RCP6.0 | 2030 | 3929.22 | 514.55 | 0.416 |
| RCP6.0 | 2050 | 3959.01 | 538.16 | 0.841 |
| RCP6.0 | 2070 | 3982.11 | 548.55 | 0.337 |