Literature DB >> 25180481

Particulate metals and organic compounds from electronic and tobacco-containing cigarettes: comparison of emission rates and secondhand exposure.

Arian Saffari1, Nancy Daher, Ario Ruprecht, Cinzia De Marco, Paolo Pozzi, Roberto Boffi, Samera H Hamad, Martin M Shafer, James J Schauer, Dane Westerdahl, Constantinos Sioutas.   

Abstract

In recent years, electronic cigarettes have gained increasing popularity as alternatives to normal (tobacco-containing) cigarettes. In the present study, particles generated by e-cigarettes and normal cigarettes have been analyzed and the degree of exposure to different chemical agents and their emission rates were quantified. Despite the 10-fold decrease in the total exposure to particulate elements in e-cigarettes compared to normal cigarettes, specific metals (e.g. Ni and Ag) still displayed a higher emission rate from e-cigarettes. Further analysis indicated that the contribution of e-liquid to the emission of these metals is rather minimal, implying that they likely originate from other components of the e-cigarette device or other indoor sources. Organic species had lower emission rates during e-cigarette consumption compared to normal cigarettes. Of particular note was the non-detectable emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from e-cigarettes, while substantial emission of these species was observed from normal cigarettes. Overall, with the exception of Ni, Zn, and Ag, the consumption of e-cigarettes resulted in a remarkable decrease in secondhand exposure to all metals and organic compounds. Implementing quality control protocols on the manufacture of e-cigarettes would further minimize the emission of metals from these devices and improve their safety and associated health effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180481     DOI: 10.1039/c4em00415a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  30 in total

Review 1.  Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study.

Authors:  Esteve Fernández; Montse Ballbè; Xisca Sureda; Marcela Fu; Esteve Saltó; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  How close are we to definitively identifying the respiratory health effects of e-cigarettes?

Authors:  Alexsandra Ratajczak; Wojciech Feleszko; Danielle M Smith; Maciej Goniewicz
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Perceptions of Secondhand E-Cigarette Aerosol Among Twitter Users.

Authors:  Jennifer B Unger; Patricia Escobedo; Jon-Patrick Allem; Daniel W Soto; Kar-Hai Chu; Tess Cruz
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  Use of electronic cigarettes in smoke-free environments.

Authors:  Yuyan Shi; Sharon E Cummins; Shu-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Knowledge about Chemicals in e-Cigarette Secondhand Vapor and Perceived Harms of Exposure among a National Sample of U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Susan Mello; Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  A direct method for e-cigarette aerosol sample collection.

Authors:  Pablo Olmedo; Ana Navas-Acien; Catherine Hess; Stephanie Jarmul; Ana Rule
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 7.  Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do?

Authors:  Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Tobacco Attitudes and Behaviors of Vape Shop Retailers in Los Angeles.

Authors:  Jon-Patrick Allem; Jennifer B Unger; Robert Garcia; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Steve Sussman
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2015-11

9.  A custom-built low-cost chamber for exposing rodents to e-cigarette aerosol: practical considerations.

Authors:  Markus Hilpert; Vesna Ilievski; Maxine Coady; Maria Andrade-Gutierrez; Beizhan Yan; Steven N Chillrud; Ana Navas-Acien; Norman J Kleiman
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Assessment of reactive oxygen species generated by electronic cigarettes using acellular and cellular approaches.

Authors:  Jiayuan Zhao; Yipei Zhang; Jennifer D Sisler; Justine Shaffer; Stephen S Leonard; Anna M Morris; Yong Qian; Dhimiter Bello; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.