Ayelet Talmi1, Maya Bunik2, Ryan Asherin3, Michael Rannie4, Tyler Watlington5, Brenda Beaty6, Stephen Berman5. 1. Departments of Psychiatry, and Pediatrics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Children's Outcomes Research, and ayelet.talmi@ucdenver.edu. 2. Pediatrics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Children's Outcomes Research, and. 3. Departments of Psychiatry, and. 4. Clinical Informatics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; and. 5. Pediatrics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; 6. Preventative Medicine and Biometrics, Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening, early identification, and referral improves outcomes for young children at risk for developmental delays. Effective developmental screening processes should include efforts to ensure referral completion and documentation of evaluation results and service eligibility in the child's medical record. Our objectives were to improve provider documentation of actions taken after an abnormal developmental screening result and increase Early Intervention (State Part C) referrals. METHODS: Various strategies including an electronic medical record template, monthly clinical informatics reporting, and a phone follow-up after an abnormal screening result were implemented to enhance provider documentation of screening results and improve referral actions and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the children eligible for screening (n = 3023), 2610 (86%) were screened, with 382 (15%) scoring in the abnormal range. With phone follow-up, 50% of the abnormal screenings were referred to community resources, including 43% to Early Intervention (EI), in contrast to 20% community referrals and 13% EI referrals with the screening template only (P < .0001). Provider documentation of EI outcomes increased when screening templates and follow-up calls were implemented together (31%) as compared with using the screening template alone (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced documentation of developmental screening efforts using screening templates and clinical informatics reporting in combination with phone follow-up after an abnormal screening result improved developmental screening outcomes, including referral rates, completed evaluations, and provider documentation of EI services. Such strategies can be effectively used in pediatric primary care settings to improve screening processes and ensure that young children access appropriate services.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening, early identification, and referral improves outcomes for young children at risk for developmental delays. Effective developmental screening processes should include efforts to ensure referral completion and documentation of evaluation results and service eligibility in the child's medical record. Our objectives were to improve provider documentation of actions taken after an abnormal developmental screening result and increase Early Intervention (State Part C) referrals. METHODS: Various strategies including an electronic medical record template, monthly clinical informatics reporting, and a phone follow-up after an abnormal screening result were implemented to enhance provider documentation of screening results and improve referral actions and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the children eligible for screening (n = 3023), 2610 (86%) were screened, with 382 (15%) scoring in the abnormal range. With phone follow-up, 50% of the abnormal screenings were referred to community resources, including 43% to Early Intervention (EI), in contrast to 20% community referrals and 13% EI referrals with the screening template only (P < .0001). Provider documentation of EI outcomes increased when screening templates and follow-up calls were implemented together (31%) as compared with using the screening template alone (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced documentation of developmental screening efforts using screening templates and clinical informatics reporting in combination with phone follow-up after an abnormal screening result improved developmental screening outcomes, including referral rates, completed evaluations, and provider documentation of EI services. Such strategies can be effectively used in pediatric primary care settings to improve screening processes and ensure that young children access appropriate services.
Authors: Paul S Carbone; Kathleen Campbell; Jacob Wilkes; Gregory J Stoddard; Kelly Huynh; Paul C Young; Terisa P Gabrielsen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kathleen Campbell; Kimberly L H Carpenter; Steven Espinosa; Jordan Hashemi; Qiang Qiu; Mariano Tepper; Robert Calderbank; Guillermo Sapiro; Helen L Egger; Jeffrey P Baker; Geraldine Dawson Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Nataliia Burakevych; Christopher Joel Dorman McKinlay; Jane Marie Alsweiler; Trecia Ann Wouldes; Jane Elizabeth Harding Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Vidhu V Thaker; Felix Lee; Clement J Bottino; Cassandra L Perry; Ingrid A Holm; Joel N Hirschhorn; Stavroula K Osganian Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 1.168